Relating to: a presumption that equalizing physical placement to the highest degree is in the child’s best ...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 161 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 161.
You're tracking SB 161
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 161 — Relating to: a presumption that equalizing physical placement to the highest degree is in the child’s best interest.
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced March 27, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to amend 767.41 (4) (a) 2.; to create 767.41 (5) (am) 5m. of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill establishes a presumption that equal physical placement with both parents is in the child's best interest, modifying the current law's standard.
-
Wis. Stat. § 767.41 (4) (a) 2.
the court shall set a placement schedule that allows the child to have regularly occurring, meaningful periods of physical placement with each parent and that maximizes the amount of time the child may spend with each parent→ the court shall presume that a placement schedule that allows the child to have regularly occurring, meaningful periods of physical placement with each parent and that maximizes equalizes to the highest degree the amount of time the child may spend with each parentThis change shifts the emphasis from a flexible placement schedule to a presumption of equal physical placement time with both parents.
-
Wis. Stat. § 767.41 (4) (a) 2.
The presumption under this subdivision is rebutted if→ The presumption under this subdivision is rebutted if a court finds by a preponderance of the evidence, after considering all of the factors in sub. (5) (am),This provides a clear standard for rebutting the presumption of equal placement.
-
Wis. Stat. § 767.41 (5) (am) 5m.
The geographic separation of the parties.
This adds a new factor for the court to consider when determining the best interests of the child regarding physical placement.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families
-
Introduced by Senator Wimberger; cosponsored by Representatives Mursau, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Dallman, Knodl, Kreibich, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk and Steffen
Sponsors
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- Armstrong · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Brooks · Cosponsor
- Dallman · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Steffen · Cosponsor
- Eric Wimberger · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wimberger, Eric Republican
Co-sponsors (10)
- Mursau
- Armstrong
- Behnke
- Brooks
- Dallman
- Knodl
- Kreibich
- O'Connor
- Piwowarczyk
- Steffen
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 161 do?
- An Act to amend 767.41 (4) (a) 2.; to create 767.41 (5) (am) 5m. of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 161?
- SB 161 is sponsored by Mursau, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Dallman, Knodl, Kreibich, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk, Steffen, and Wimberger, Eric (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 161?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced March 27, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 161?
- Track SB 161 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 161
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 161
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →