Relating to: interpreter action by telephone or live audiovisual means in civil or criminal proceedings.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 147 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 147.
You're tracking SB 147
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 147 — Relating to: interpreter action by telephone or live audiovisual means in civil or criminal proceedings.
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 21, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Assembly.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
25 sponsors
1 primary, 24 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to amend 807.14 and 967.09 of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
32 added · 16 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Senate Bill 147 allows interpreters to participate in civil and criminal trials via telephone or live audiovisual means, whereas the previous version excluded trials from this option. This change is significant because it enhances accessibility for individuals who require interpretation services during court proceedings, ensuring they can fully engage in the judicial process. Now, both parties involved in a trial can request this mode of interpretation with the agreement of all involved, making the courts more accommodating for non-English speakers.
CORRECTED COPY - 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0114/1LRB-2380/1 MJW:wljMJW:cdc SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 147 MayMarch 6,21, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatoANGGAARDSenators .WANGGAARD , CABRAL-GUEVARA and TOMCZYK , cosponsored by Representatives UCHOW , ALLEN , ARMSTRONG , B RIL, DITTRICH, ONOVAN , GUNDRUM , KITCHENS, KNODL, MAXEY, MURPHY , M URSAU , NEYLON , NOVAK , O'CONNOR , O RTI-VELEZ, P ENTERMAN , PIWOWARCZYK , RODRIGUEZ , ORTWELL , TEFFEN and W ICHGERS.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendJudiciary theand billPublic asSafety. follows:
1.A N A CT to amend 807.14 and 967.09 of the statutes;
Pagerelating 1,to: line 5:
deleteinterpreter Xotheraction thanby trialYtelephone andor substitutelive Xotheraudiovisual thanmeans trialY.in civil or criminal proceedings.
2.Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, in any civil or criminal proceeding other than a trial, a court may permit an interpreter to act by telephone or live audiovisual means.
PageThis 1,bill lineremoves 6:the exclusion for trials, so that an interpreter may act by telephone or live audiovisual means in any civil or criminal proceeding.
afterThe Xmeans.Ypeople insert XOn request of any party, with the consentstate of allWisconsin, otherrepresented parties, the court may permit an interpreter to act in asenate civiland trialassembly, bydo telephoneenact oras livefollows: audiovisual means.Y.
3.SECTION 1.
Page807.14 2,of linethe 1:statutes is amended to read:
delete807.14 theInterpreters. material beginning with X, otherY and ending with Xtrial,Y on line 2 and substitute X, other than trial,Y.
4.On request of any party, the court may permit an interpreter to act in any civil proceeding other than trial by telephone or live audiovisual means.
PageSECTION 2,2. line 2:
after967.09 Xmeans.Y insert XOn request of any party, with the consentstatutes ofis allamended other parties, the court may permit an interpreter to actread: in a criminal trial by telephone or live audiovisual means.Y.
(END)967.09 Interpreters may serve by telephone or video.
On request of any - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2380/1 MJW:cdc SENATE BILL 147 S ECTION 2 party, the court may permit an interpreter to act in any criminal proceeding, other than trial, by telephone or live audiovisual means.
END )
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 5-15-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 6, Noes 2
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Cabral-Guevara and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Duchow, Allen, Armstrong, Brill, Dittrich, Donovan, Gundrum, Kitchens, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Ortiz-Velez, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Rodriguez, Sortwell, Steffen and Wichgers
Sponsors
- Duchow · Cosponsor
- Allen · Cosponsor
- Armstrong · Cosponsor
- Brill · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Donovan · Cosponsor
- Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Kitchens · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Maxey · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- Neylon · Cosponsor
- Novak · Cosponsor
- O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Ortiz-Velez · Cosponsor
- Penterman · Cosponsor
- Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- Sortwell · Cosponsor
- Steffen · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Cosponsor
- Cory Tomczyk · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 24 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
Co-sponsors (24)
- Duchow
- Allen
- Armstrong
- Brill
- Dittrich
- Donovan
- Gundrum
- Kitchens
- Knodl
- Maxey
- Murphy
- Mursau
- Neylon
- Novak
- O'Connor
- Ortiz-Velez
- Penterman
- Piwowarczyk
- Rodriguez
- Sortwell
- Steffen
- Wichgers
- Cabral-Guevara, Rachael Republican
- Tomczyk, Cory Republican
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 147 do?
- An Act to amend 807.14 and 967.09 of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 147?
- SB 147 is sponsored by Duchow, Allen, Armstrong, Brill, Dittrich, Donovan, Gundrum, Kitchens, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Ortiz-Velez, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Rodriguez, Sortwell, Steffen, Wichgers, Wanggaard, Van (Republican), Cabral-Guevara, Rachael (Republican), and Tomczyk, Cory (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 147?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 21, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 147?
- Track SB 147 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 147
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 147
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →