Relating to certain deposits, fees, or charges required to be provided by a tenant or prospective tenant in...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1299 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1299.
You're tracking HB 1299
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1299 — Relating to certain deposits, fees, or charges required to be provided by a tenant or prospective tenant in connection with a residential lease.
Last action — Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development: Mar 10 2025 2:24PM
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
Died in session
This bill died with 89th Legislature, Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to certain deposits, fees, or charges required to be provided by a tenant or prospective tenant in connection with a residential lease.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1299 on the official Texas source →Compared against the Texas statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends 2 section(s) of the Texas statutes: Section 92.001, Property Code, Section 92.102, Property Code.
-
Section 92.001, Property Code
(5-a) "Security deposit" means a security deposit described by Section 92.102.
amended
-
Section 92.102, Property Code
(a) or to secure payment for damage to the leased premises (b) Any deposit that a landlord requires a prospective tenant to provide to the landlord to lease a dwelling or that the lease requires a tenant to provide to the landlord or maintain in effect for all or part of the lease term is presumed to be a security deposit. Any refundable or nonrefundable fee or charge required by a landlord for damages, no matter how designated, is presumed to be a security deposit.
amended
Action History
-
Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
-
Read first time
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Hubert Vo · Primary
- Diego Bernal · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1299 do?
- Relating to certain deposits, fees, or charges required to be provided by a tenant or prospective tenant in connection with a residential lease.
- Who sponsors HB 1299?
- HB 1299 is sponsored by Hubert Vo and Diego Bernal.
- What is the current status of HB 1299?
- This bill died with 89th Legislature, Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1299?
- Track HB 1299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1299
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1299
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →