Cut the Perks Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 6295 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 6295.
You're tracking HR 6295
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 6295 — Cut the Perks Act
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
Died in session
This bill died with 115th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Cut the Perks Act This bill requires a political appointee who personally requests the obligation or expenditure of federal funds in willful violation of a federal law, rule, or regulation to reimburse the government for the amount of such obligation or expenditure.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HR 6295 on the official United States source →Action History
-
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
-
Introduced in House
Sponsors
- Krysten Sinema · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 6295 do?
- Cut the Perks Act This bill requires a political appointee who personally requests the obligation or expenditure of federal funds in willful violation of a federal law, rule, or regulation to reimburse the government for the amount of such obligation or expenditure.
- Who sponsors HR 6295?
- HR 6295 is sponsored by Krysten Sinema (D).
- What is the current status of HR 6295?
- This bill died with 115th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 6295?
- Track HR 6295 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 6295
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 6295
Last checked for changes about 14 hours ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →