Fraudulent Joinder Prevention Act of 2016
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 3624 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 3624.
You're tracking HR 3624
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 3624 — Fraudulent Joinder Prevention Act of 2016
Last action — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
Died in session
This bill died with 114th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Fraudulent Joinder Prevention Act of 2016 (Sec. 2) This bill amends procedures under which federal courts determine whether a case that was removed from a state court to a federal court on the basis of a diversity of citizenship among the parties may be remanded back to state court upon a motion opposed on fraudulent joinder grounds that: (1) one or more defendants are citizens of the same state as one or more plaintiffs, or (2) one or more defendants properly joined and served are citizens of the state in which the action was brought. Joinder of such a defendant is fraudulent if the court finds: actual fraud in the pleading of jurisdictional facts with respect to that defendant, state law would not plausibly impose liability on that defendant, state or federal law bars all claims in the complaint against that defendant, or no good faith intention to prosecute the action against that defendant or to seek a joint judgment including that defendant. In determining whether to grant or deny such a motion for remand, the court: (1) may permit pleadings to be amended; and (2) must consider the pleadings, affidavits, and other evidence submitted by the parties. A federal court finding that all such defendants have been fraudulently joined must: (1) dismiss without prejudice the claims against those defendants, and (2) deny the motion for remand.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HR 3624 on the official United States source →Action History
-
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 229 - 189 (Roll no. 89).
-
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 180 - 239 (Roll no. 88).
-
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H917)
-
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Watson Coleman motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add an exemption to the underlying bill for cases in which the plaintiff seeks relief in connection with the sexual abuse or exploitation of a minor.
-
Mrs. Watson Coleman moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on the Judiciary. (consideration: CR H916; text: CR H916)
-
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H913)
-
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H916)
-
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3624.
-
H.Amdt.945 On agreeing to the Cartwright amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 178 - 237 (Roll no. 87).
-
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
-
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
-
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H915-918)
-
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 3624 as unfinished business.
-
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
-
Mr. Buck moved that the Committee rise.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cartwright amendement No. 2 the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote annouced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cartwright demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res 618, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cartwright (PA) amendment No. 2.
-
H.Amdt.945 Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Cartwright. (consideration: CR H913-915, H915-916; text: CR H913)
-
H.Amdt.944 On agreeing to the Buck amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 618, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Buck (CO) amendment No. 1.
-
H.Amdt.944 Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Buck. (consideration: CR H913; text: CR H913)
-
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3624.
-
The Speaker designated the Honorable Garret Graves to act as Chairman of the Committee.
-
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 618 and Rule XVIII.
-
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3624 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.
-
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 618. (consideration: CR H907-915)
-
Rule H. Res. 618 passed House.
-
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 618 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3624 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 321.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 114-422.
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 10.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
-
Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice Discharged.
-
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
-
Introduced in House
Sponsors
- Ken Buck · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ken Buck R
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 3624 do?
- Fraudulent Joinder Prevention Act of 2016 (Sec. 2) This bill amends procedures under which federal courts determine whether a case that was removed from a state court to a federal court on the basis of a diversity of citizenship among the parties may be remanded back to state court upon a motion opposed on fraudulent joinder grounds that: (1) one or more defendants are citizens of the same state as one or more plaintiffs, or (2) one or more defendants properly joined and served are citizens of the state in which the action was brought. Joinder of such a defendant is fraudulent if the court finds: actual fraud in the pleading of jurisdictional facts with respect to that defendant, state law would not plausibly impose liability on that defendant, state or federal law bars all claims in the complaint against that defendant, or no good faith intention to prosecute the action against that defendant or to seek a joint judgment including that defendant. In determining whether to grant or deny such a motion for remand, the court: (1) may permit pleadings to be amended; and (2) must consider the pleadings, affidavits, and other evidence submitted by the parties. A federal court finding that all such defendants have been fraudulently joined must: (1) dismiss without prejudice the claims against those defendants, and (2) deny the motion for remand.
- Who sponsors HR 3624?
- HR 3624 is sponsored by Ken Buck (R).
- What is the current status of HR 3624?
- This bill died with 114th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 3624?
- Track HR 3624 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 3624
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 3624
Last checked for changes about 11 hours ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →