United States 114th Congress Status: Died 1 R cosponsors

HR 1734 — Improving Coal Combustion Residuals Regulation Act of 2015

Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. Died in session

This bill died with 114th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Improving Coal Combustion Residuals Regulation Act of 2015 (Sec. 2) This bill amends subtitle D (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act to establish a permit program for coal combustion residuals (coal ash) that states may elect to administer. The program outlines the criteria that a state must use if it chooses to adopt and enforce a permit program regulating the management and disposal of coal ash generated by electric utilities and independent power producers. The program applies to the disposal of coal ash into landfills or surface impoundments, sand or gravel pits, quarries, or lateral expansions of the structures. The structural criteria concern: (1) design, location, and integrity; (2) financial assurance; (3) groundwater and surface water protections; (4) closure procedures; and (5) air quality with respect to fugitive dust. In order to adopt or implement a permit program, the lead state implementing agency must maintain a program for control of hazardous waste disposal in open dumps or an authorized state hazardous waste program under the Solid Waste Disposal Act. The implementing agency must ensure that certain information concerning the program is publicly available. A state that chooses to adopt a coal ash program is given sole enforcement authority. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must implement a program for a state if: (1) a state's program fails to meet those criteria, or (2) a state does not implement a program. A coal ash permit program implemented by the EPA shall not apply to the utilization, placement, and storage of coal ash at surface or underground coal mining and reclamation operations. Certain uses of coal ash are not considered as receipt of such material for purposes of this bill. These include uses for engineered structural fill, storage in a manner consistent with the management of raw materials, and such beneficial uses as substitution for virgin material (in which case the use must be shown to not result in environmental releases greater than those from a material or product that would be used instead of the coal ash or exceed relevant benchmarks for human and ecological receptors). The bill revises implementation of the EPA rule governing the disposal of coal ash, entitled "Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System; Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities." The rule may be implemented only through the permit program established by the bill.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read HR 1734 on the official United States source →

Action History

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  2. Received in the Senate.

  3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  4. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 258 - 166 (Roll no. 458).

  5. On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 184 - 240 (Roll no. 457). (consideration: CR H5379-5380)

  6. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H5379)

  7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Foster motion to recommit with instructions pending a reservation of a point of order. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to require an agency implementing any coal ash permit ensure that all disposal sites meet criteria for design, construction, operation, and maintenance sufficient to prevent contamination of groundwater and sources of drinking water, including the Great Lakes. Subsequently, the reservation was removed.

  8. Mr. Foster moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (consideration: H5378-5380; text: CR H5378)

  9. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H5378)

  10. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1734.

  11. H.Amdt.677 On agreeing to the Butterfield amendment (A006) Failed by recorded vote: 180 - 240 (Roll no. 456).

  12. H.Amdt.676 On agreeing to the Adams amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 192 - 231 (Roll no. 455).

  13. H.Amdt.675 On agreeing to the Connolly amendment (A004) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 245 (Roll no. 454).

  14. H.Amdt.673 On agreeing to the Pallone amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 244 (Roll no. 453).

  15. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Butterfield amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Butterfield demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.

  16. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Butterfield amendment No. 6.

  17. H.Amdt.677 Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Butterfield. (consideration: CR H5374-5375; H5377-5378; text: CR H5374)

  18. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Adams amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Adams demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.

  19. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Adams amendment No. 5.

  20. H.Amdt.676 Amendment (A005) offered by Ms. Adams. (consideration: CR H5373-5374, H5377; text: CR H5373)

  21. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.

  22. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly amendment No. 4.

  23. H.Amdt.675 Amendment (A004) offered by Mr. Connolly. (consideration: CR H5371-5372, H5376-5377; text: CR H5372)

  24. H.Amdt.674 On agreeing to the Castor (FL) amendment (A003) Agreed to by voice vote.

  25. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Castor (FL) amendment No. 3.

  26. H.Amdt.674 Amendment (A003) offered by Ms. Castor (FL). (consideration: CR H5371; text: CR H5371)

  27. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Pallone amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.

  28. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Pallone amendment No. 2.

  29. H.Amdt.673 Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Pallone. (consideration: CR H5370-5371, H5375-5376; text: CR H5370)

  30. H.Amdt.672 On agreeing to the Shimkus amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote.

  31. DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 369, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Shimkus amendment No. 1.

  32. H.Amdt.672 Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Shimkus. (consideration: CR H5370; text: CR H5370)

  33. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1734.

  34. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 369 and Rule XVIII.

  35. The Speaker designated the Honorable Randy Hultgren to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  36. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1599 and H.R. 1734.

  37. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 369. (consideration: H5358-5380; text as reported CR H5365-5370)

  38. Rule H. Res. 369 passed House.

  39. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 369 Reported to House. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1599 and H.R. 1734.

  40. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 103.

  41. Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 114-143.

  42. Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy.

  43. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 19.

  44. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  45. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  46. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  47. Introduced in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (546)

546 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 546 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HR 1734 do?
Improving Coal Combustion Residuals Regulation Act of 2015 (Sec. 2) This bill amends subtitle D (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act to establish a permit program for coal combustion residuals (coal ash) that states may elect to administer. The program outlines the criteria that a state must use if it chooses to adopt and enforce a permit program regulating the management and disposal of coal ash generated by electric utilities and independent power producers. The program applies to the disposal of coal ash into landfills or surface impoundments, sand or gravel pits, quarries, or lateral expansions of the structures. The structural criteria concern: (1) design, location, and integrity; (2) financial assurance; (3) groundwater and surface water protections; (4) closure procedures; and (5) air quality with respect to fugitive dust. In order to adopt or implement a permit program, the lead state implementing agency must maintain a program for control of hazardous waste disposal in open dumps or an authorized state hazardous waste program under the Solid Waste Disposal Act. The implementing agency must ensure that certain information concerning the program is publicly available. A state that chooses to adopt a coal ash program is given sole enforcement authority. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must implement a program for a state if: (1) a state's program fails to meet those criteria, or (2) a state does not implement a program. A coal ash permit program implemented by the EPA shall not apply to the utilization, placement, and storage of coal ash at surface or underground coal mining and reclamation operations. Certain uses of coal ash are not considered as receipt of such material for purposes of this bill. These include uses for engineered structural fill, storage in a manner consistent with the management of raw materials, and such beneficial uses as substitution for virgin material (in which case the use must be shown to not result in environmental releases greater than those from a material or product that would be used instead of the coal ash or exceed relevant benchmarks for human and ecological receptors). The bill revises implementation of the EPA rule governing the disposal of coal ash, entitled "Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System; Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities." The rule may be implemented only through the permit program established by the bill.
Who sponsors HR 1734?
HR 1734 is sponsored by David McKinley (R).
What is the current status of HR 1734?
This bill died with 114th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HR 1734?
Track HR 1734 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 1734

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HR 1734

Last checked for changes about 17 hours ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →