Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2014
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 1874 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 1874.
You're tracking HR 1874
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 1874 — Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2014
Last action — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
Died in session
This bill died with 113th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2014 - Amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (CBA) to require the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to prepare for each major bill or resolution reported by any congressional committee (except the congressional appropriations committees), as a supplement to CBO cost estimates, a macroeconomic impact analysis of the budgetary effects of such legislation for the 10-fiscal year period beginning with the first fiscal year for which such estimate was prepared and each of the next three 10-fiscal year periods. Defines "major bill or resolution" as any bill or resolution whose budgetary effects, for any fiscal year in the period for which a CBO cost estimate is prepared, is estimated to be greater than .25% of the current projected U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) for that fiscal year. Requires the analysis to describe: (1) the potential economic impact of the bill or resolution on major economic variables, including real GDP, business investment, the capital stock, employment, interest rates, and labor supply; and (2) the potential fiscal effects of the measure, including any estimates of revenue increases or decreases resulting from changes in GDP. Requires the analysis (or a technical appendix to it) to specify the economic and econometric models used, sources of data, relevant data transformations, as well as any explanation necessary to make the models comprehensible to academic and public policy analysts. Requires the CBO, five fiscal years after the enactment of any major bill or joint resolution for which it prepared a macroeconomic impact analysis, to report to the congressional budget committees on the accuracy of the original analysis.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HR 1874 on the official United States source →Action History
-
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 224 - 182 (Roll no. 164).
-
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 187 - 218 (Roll no. 163).
-
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2944)
-
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kuster motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to require any dynamic score under the bill to include impacts on job creation and economic growth of any investment in education, transportation and infrastructure. It also allows appropriations bills to benefit from dynamic scoring under the bill.
-
Ms. Kuster moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on the Budget. (consideration: CR H2943-2944; text: CR H2943)
-
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of committee amendment: CR H2935-2936)
-
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H2943)
-
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1874.
-
H.AMDT.609 On agreeing to the Jackson Lee amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 185 - 222 (Roll no. 162).
-
H.AMDT.607 On agreeing to the Cicilline amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 186 - 219 (Roll no. 161).
-
H.AMDT.606 On agreeing to the Israel amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 189 - 211 (Roll no. 160).
-
H.AMDT.605 On agreeing to the Connolly amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 182 - 214 (Roll no. 159).
-
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment No. 5, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 539, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) Part B amendment No. 5.
-
H.AMDT.609 Amendment (A005) offered by Ms. Jackson Lee. (consideration: CR H2939-2940, H2942-2943; text: CR H2939)Amendment sought to require CBO to include as part of their macroeconomic analysis, estimates of the potential impact on HUB ZONE areas as defined by the Small Business Act.
-
H.AMDT.608 On agreeing to the Bishop (NY) amendment (A004) Agreed to by voice vote.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 539, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bishop (NY) Part B amendment No. 4.
-
H.AMDT.608 Amendment (A004) offered by Mr. Bishop (NY). (consideration: CR H2938-2939; text: CR H2983)Amendment requires the Congressional Budget Office to review and report on the accuracy of dynamic scoring estimates 5 fiscal years after any dynamically scored bill is enacted.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cicilline amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cicilline demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 539, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cicilline Part B amendment No. 3.
-
H.AMDT.607 Amendment (A003) offered by Mr. Cicilline. (consideration: CR H2937-2938, H2942; text: CR H2937)Amendment sought to require CBO to include jobs impact statements (estimates of the number of jobs which would be created, sustained, or lost in carrying out applicable bills or resolutions) using the CBO's existing analytical principles and procedures.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Israel amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Israel demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 539, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Israel Part B amendment No. 2.
-
H.AMDT.606 Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Israel. (consideration: CR H2937, H2941-2942; text: CR H2937)Amendment sought to add impact on State and local governments to the parameters that CBO must analyze in a supplemental analysis under the bill.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 539, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly Part B amendment No. 1.
-
H.AMDT.605 Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Connolly. (consideration: CR H2936-2937, H2940-2941; text: CR H2936)Amendment sought to subject Congressional appropriations bills to dynamic scoring and to change the threshold to trigger such scoring to $1 billion.
-
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1874.
-
The Speaker designated the Honorable Doug Collins to act as Chairman of the Committee.
-
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 539 and Rule XVIII.
-
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1874, H.R. 1871, and H.R. 1872. The resolution provides for 1 hour of general debate for each bill. Specified amendments printed in Part B of House Report 113-400 are in order for H.R. 1874. The resolution allows for one motion to recommit with instructions for each bill.
-
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 539. (consideration: CR H2927-2945)
-
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 539 Reported to House. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1874, H.R. 1871, and H.R. 1872. The resolution provides for 1 hour of general debate for each bill. Specified amendments printed in Part B of House Report 113-400 are in order for H.R. 1874. The resolution allows for one motion to recommit with instructions for each bill.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 116.
-
Committee on Rules discharged.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Budget. H. Rept. 113-161, Part I.
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 11.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
-
Referred to House Rules
-
Referred to House Budget
-
Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsors
- Tom Price · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on · 402 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Tom Price R Voted No
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 154 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| Democrat | 24 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Whig | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| R | 2 | 191 | 0 | 8 |
| Jackson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Federalist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 185 | 222 | 0 | 24 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 52% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (431)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 156 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Democrat | 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Whig | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| R | 0 | 192 | 0 | 9 |
| Jackson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Federalist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 187 | 218 | 0 | 26 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 51% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (431)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 24 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 1 | 155 | 0 | 12 |
| Democrat | 4 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Whig | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| R | 193 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Jackson | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federalist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 224 | 182 | 0 | 25 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 42% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (431)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 1874 do?
- Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2014 - Amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (CBA) to require the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to prepare for each major bill or resolution reported by any congressional committee (except the congressional appropriations committees), as a supplement to CBO cost estimates, a macroeconomic impact analysis of the budgetary effects of such legislation for the 10-fiscal year period beginning with the first fiscal year for which such estimate was prepared and each of the next three 10-fiscal year periods. Defines "major bill or resolution" as any bill or resolution whose budgetary effects, for any fiscal year in the period for which a CBO cost estimate is prepared, is estimated to be greater than .25% of the current projected U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) for that fiscal year. Requires the analysis to describe: (1) the potential economic impact of the bill or resolution on major economic variables, including real GDP, business investment, the capital stock, employment, interest rates, and labor supply; and (2) the potential fiscal effects of the measure, including any estimates of revenue increases or decreases resulting from changes in GDP. Requires the analysis (or a technical appendix to it) to specify the economic and econometric models used, sources of data, relevant data transformations, as well as any explanation necessary to make the models comprehensible to academic and public policy analysts. Requires the CBO, five fiscal years after the enactment of any major bill or joint resolution for which it prepared a macroeconomic impact analysis, to report to the congressional budget committees on the accuracy of the original analysis.
- Who sponsors HR 1874?
- HR 1874 is sponsored by Tom Price (R).
- What is the current status of HR 1874?
- This bill died with 113th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 1874?
- Track HR 1874 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 1874
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 1874
Last checked for changes about 18 hours ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →