Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the b...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HRES 1782 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HRES 1782.
You're tracking HRES 1782
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HRES 1782 — Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.B. 3082) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.
Last action — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
Died in session
This bill died with 111th Congress. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.B. 3082) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HRES 1782 on the official United States source →Action History
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8901)
-
The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H8905)
-
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1782.
-
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H8901-8905)
-
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 259.
-
The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 3082. It provides one hour of debate on the motion. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the motion. The Senate amendment shall be considered as read.
-
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-694, by Mr. Polis (CO).
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 547 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (547)
547 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 547 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HRES 1782 do?
- Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.B. 3082) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
- What is the current status of HRES 1782?
- This bill died with 111th Congress. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HRES 1782?
- Track HRES 1782 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HRES 1782
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HRES 1782
Last checked for changes about 18 hours ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →