Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HRES 667 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HRES 667.
You're tracking HRES 667
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HRES 667 — Raising a question of the privileges of the House.
Last action — On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 189, 14 Present (Roll no. 605).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
Died in session
This bill died with 111th Congress. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Requires the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to immediately establish an investigative subcommittee and begin an investigation into the relationship between: (1) the source and timing of past campaign contributions to Members of the House related to the raided prominent defense-lobbying firm; and (2) earmark requests made by Members on behalf of the firm's clients.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HRES 667 on the official United States source →Action History
-
On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 189, 14 Present (Roll no. 605).
-
Mr. Andrews moved to table the measure.
-
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H8509-8510; text of measure as introduced: CR H8509)
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 547 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (547)
547 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 547 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HRES 667 do?
- Requires the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to immediately establish an investigative subcommittee and begin an investigation into the relationship between: (1) the source and timing of past campaign contributions to Members of the House related to the raided prominent defense-lobbying firm; and (2) earmark requests made by Members on behalf of the firm's clients.
- What is the current status of HRES 667?
- This bill died with 111th Congress. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HRES 667?
- Track HRES 667 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HRES 667
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HRES 667
Last checked for changes about 15 hours ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →