An Act to improve transparency in alleged police misconduct
The bill focuses on making information related to police misconduct allegations more accessible to the public. By improving transparency, it seeks to increase accountability within law enforcement agencies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H1872 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H1872.
You're tracking H1872
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H1872 — An Act to improve transparency in alleged police misconduct
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
This bill aims to enhance transparency regarding allegations of police misconduct.
The bill focuses on making information related to police misconduct allegations more accessible to the public. By improving transparency, it seeks to increase accountability within law enforcement agencies.
Summary
An Act to improve transparency in alleged police misconduct
Bill Text
- Full text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill substantially rewrites the procedures and authorities related to inquests following certain deaths, establishing new criteria and participants for inquest requests.
-
Section 8 of Chapter 38
Section 8.→ Section 8. The chief medical examiner or his designee may request the attorney general or the district attorney to direct that an inquest be held. The attorney general or district attorney may, regardless of whether or not action has been taken by the office of the chief medical examiner, require an inquest to be held in case of any death. The district court which has jurisdiction over the matter shall thereupon hold an inquest. The attorney general, district attorney, police chief, executive of a city, or select board of a town may request an inquest, which is to be conducted by the attorney general or the district attorney, to be held in any case in which there is reasonable suspicion that a law enforcement officer, within their respective jurisdiction, while acting within the scope as a law enforcement officer, engaged in conduct which violated any laws or regulations of the of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or the city or town, and result of such violation, caused serious bodily injury to another, as defined under chapter two hundred and sixty-five. The district court which has jurisdiction over the matter shall thereupon hold an inquest. The court shall give seasonable notice of the time and place of the inquest to the department of telecommunications and energy, in any case of death by accident upon a public conveyance regulated by said department, and to the registry of motor vehicles in any case of death in which any motor vehicle is involved. Such notice shall also be given to any parent, spouse, or other member of the deceased's immediate family or to the deceased's legal representative or legal guardian. Any person who has been identified by the attorney general, the district attorney, as the case may be, as the target of an investigation in connection with the death of the deceased or serious bodily injury of another, may be present during the holding of such inquest and be represented by counsel, and may request leave of the court to present or examine witnesses, and shall at the completion of the court's report of said inquest have the right to examine said report; provided, however, that no indictment shall be dismissed nor shall any evidence be suppressed for violation of the provisions of this paragraph. All other persons not required by law to attend may be excluded from the inquest; provided, however, the complainant, the parents, guardian or next of kin of the person whose death or serious bodily injury is the subject of the inquest shall be deemed to be interested persons who may be present during the holding of such inquest. The court may order, as it deems appropriate, that witnesses to be examined during the inquest be sequestered.This change replaces the existing text with a comprehensive framework for inquests, expanding the list of individuals who can request an inquest and detailing the circumstances under which it must be held.
Sponsors
- Christopher M. Markey · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 203 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Christopher M. Markey Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (203)
203 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 203 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H1872 do?
- An Act to improve transparency in alleged police misconduct
- Who sponsors H1872?
- H1872 is sponsored by Christopher M. Markey (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H1872?
- This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H1872?
- Track H1872 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H1872
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H1872
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →