Relating to: recommendation to revoke extended supervision, parole, or probation if a person is charged wit...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 93 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 93.
You're tracking SB 93
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 93 — Relating to: recommendation to revoke extended supervision, parole, or probation if a person is charged with a crime. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced March 07, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
15 sponsors
1 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill mandates the Department of Corrections to recommend revocation of extended supervision, parole, or probation if a person is charged with a crime while on release.
-
302.113 (8m) (a)
If the person is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s extended supervision be revoked.
Requires the DOC to recommend revocation of extended supervision upon a new criminal charge.
-
302.114 (8m) (a)
If the person is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s extended supervision be revoked.
Requires the DOC to recommend revocation of extended supervision upon a new criminal charge.
-
304.06 (3)
If the prisoner is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the prisoner’s parole be revoked.
Requires the DOC to recommend revocation of parole upon a new criminal charge.
-
973.10 (2) (intro.)
If the probationer is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s probation be revoked.
Requires the DOC to recommend revocation of probation upon a new criminal charge.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Hutton, Bradley, Jacque, Nass, Tomczyk, James and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives B. Jacobson, Donovan, Duchow, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Penterman and Wichgers
Sponsors
- B. Jacobson · Cosponsor
- Donovan · Cosponsor
- Duchow · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Maxey · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Penterman · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Rob Hutton · Primary
- Julian Bradley · Cosponsor
- André Jacque · Cosponsor
- Steve Nass · Cosponsor
- Cory Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- Jesse James · Cosponsor
- Van Wanggaard · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hutton, Rob Republican
Co-sponsors (14)
- B. Jacobson
- Donovan
- Duchow
- Knodl
- Maxey
- Murphy
- Penterman
- Wichgers
- Bradley, Julian Republican
- Jacque, André Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Tomczyk, Cory Republican
- James, Jesse Republican
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 93 do?
- An Act to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 93?
- SB 93 is sponsored by B. Jacobson, Donovan, Duchow, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Penterman, Wichgers, Hutton, Rob (Republican), Bradley, Julian (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), Tomczyk, Cory (Republican), James, Jesse (Republican), and Wanggaard, Van (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 93?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced March 07, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 93?
- Track SB 93 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 93
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 93
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →