SB 76 — Relating to: dismissing or amending certain criminal charges and deferred prosecution agreements for certain crimes.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 26, 2025. It awaits signature.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on November 03, 2025.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
17 sponsors
1 primary, 16 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to repeal 971.37; to amend 20.410 (1) (gL), 20.437 (1) (hh), 814.75 (8), 814.75 (8m), 814.76 (6), 814.80 (6), 814.81 (6), 971.38 (1) and 971.39 (1) (intro.); to create 967.056 and 968.075 (7) (c) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
62 added · 151 removedPlain-language change summary
The proposed changes in Senate Bill 76 require prosecutors to obtain court approval before they can dismiss or amend certain criminal charges, particularly those related to domestic abuse, theft of automobiles, and various violent crimes. This shift aims to ensure that serious offenses are handled more transparently and with judicial oversight, which could help protect victims and hold offenders accountable. By limiting prosecutor discretion in these cases, the bill seeks to strengthen the justice system's response to crimes that significantly impact community safety.
-Date 2026of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-2036/1 CMH:emw SENATE BILL 76 February 26, 2025 - Introduced by Senators H UTTON , NASS and T OMCZYK , cosponsored by Representatives B.
JACOBSONSenate ,Bill BEHNKE76 ,Date BRILL,of DITTRICH,publication*: DONOVAN , DUCHOW , GUNDRUM , KNODL, KREIBICH , KRUG, MOSES , MURPHY , M URSAU and W ICHGERS .
ReferredWISCONSIN toACT CommitteeA onN JudiciaryA andCT Publicto Safety.repeal 971.37;
Ato Namend A814.75 CT(8), to814.75 repeal(8m), 971.37;814.76 (6), 814.80 (6), 814.81 (6), 971.38 (1) and 971.39 (1) (intro.);
to amend 20.410 (1) (gL), 20.437 (1) (hh), 814.75 (8), 814.75 (8m), 814.76 (6), 814.80 (6), 814.81 (6), 971.38 (1) and 971.39 (1) (intro.);
dismissing or amending certaincer- tain criminal charges and deferred prosecution agreements for certain crimes.
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Underrepresented currentin law,sen- aprosecution prosecutorof maypersons dismisswho orcommit amendoffenses athat criminalare chargeate withoutand approvalassembly, fromdo theenact court.as follows:
Undercovered thiscrimes. bill, a prosecutor must get the court’s approval to dismiss or amend a charge if the charge is for any of the following:
1)SECTION a3. crime of domestic abuse or a violation of a domestic violence temporary restraining order or injunction;
2)814.75 theft(8) of anthe automobile;statutes is amended to (2) D EFINITION .
3)In athis crimesection, ofXcovered abusecrimeY ofread: an individual at risk or a violation of an individual-at-risk TRO or injunction;
4)means first-degree,any second-degree,of orthe third-degreefollowing: sexual assault;
5)(a) aAn crimeact againstof adomestic child;abuse, as defined in s.
6) illegal possession of a firearm if the person has been convicted of, adjudicated delinquent for, or found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect of, committing, soliciting, conspiring, or attempting to commit a violent felony, as defined under current law;
or 7) reckless driving that results in great bodily harm.
The court may approve the dismissal or amendment of such a charge only if the court finds the - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2036/1 CMH:emw SENATE BILL 76 SECTION 1 action is consistent with the public’s interest in deterring the commission of these crimes and with the legislature’s intent, expressed in this bill, to vigorously prosecute individuals who commit these crimes.
If the court approves any dismissal or amendment in a year, the court must submit an annual report to the legislature detailing each approval.
Current law allows a prosecutor to enter into a deferred prosecution agreement with a defendant who is charged or may be charged with a crime.
Generally, under a deferred prosecution agreement, the prosecutor agrees to dismiss a charge or not file a charge if the defendant complies with specified conditions.
In addition, current law provides specific criteria for a deferred prosecution agreement if the defendant is or may be charged with child sexual abuse if the defendant is the parent of, the guardian of, a close relative of, or residing with the child;
with a crime of domestic violence;
or with a violation of a domestic violence TRO or injunction.
Current law also prohibits a prosecutor from entering into a deferred prosecution agreement with a defendant who is charged or may be charged with operating a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or a controlled substance, causing injury to another while operating a vehicle while under the influence, or homicide by intoxicated use of a vehicle.
The bill prohibits a prosecutor from entering into a deferred prosecution agreement with a defendant if a complaint or information is filed that alleges the person committed any of the same crimes listed in items 1 to 7 above.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
20.410 (1) (gL) of the statutes is amended to read:
20.410 (1) (gL) Global positioning system tracking devices for certain violators of restraining orders.
All moneys received under s.
301.49 (5) and all moneys received from the global positioning system tracking surcharge on court fines, as authorized under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.057, for expenditures related to the global positioning system tracking program under s.
301.49.
If the unencumbered balance in this appropriation account exceeds $100,000 immediately before the end of any fiscal year, the department of corrections shall transfer the excess to the appropriation account under s.
20.437 (1) (hh) at the end of that fiscal year.
SECTION 2.
20.437 (1) (hh) of the statutes is amended to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2036/1 CMH:emw SENATE BILL 76 SECTION 2 20.437 (1) (hh) Domestic abuse surcharge grants.
All moneys received from the domestic abuse surcharge on court fines, as authorized under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
Show all 136 changed lines (96 more)
or 973.055, to provide grants to domestic abuse services organizations under s.
49.165.
S ECTION 3.
814.75 (8) of the statutes is amended to read:
S968.075 ECTION(1) (a), that constitutes the commission of a SECTION 4.
814.75 (8m) of the statutes is amended crime or a violation of a temporary restraining order or to read:
814.75injunction (8m)issued The global positioning system tracking surcharge under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.057.
S ECTION 5.
814.76 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:
814.76 (6) The domestic abuse surcharge under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.055.
S ECTION 6.
814.80 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:
814.80 (6) The domestic abuse surcharge under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.055.
S ECTION 7.
814.81 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:
814.81 (6) The domestic abuse surcharge under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.055.
S ECTION 8.
967.056 of the statutes is created to read:
967.056 Prosecution of certain crimes.
(1) I NTENT .
The legislature intends to encourage the vigorous prosecution of persons who commit offenses that are covered crimes.
- 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2036/1 CMH:emw SENATE BILL 76 SECTION 8 (2) DEFINITION.
In this section, “covered crime” means any of the following:
(a) An act of domestic abuse, as defined in s.
968.075 (1) (a), that constitutes the commission of a crime or a violation of a temporary restraining order or injunction issued under s.
814.75 (8m) The global positioning system tracking (b) A violation of s.
940.198 or 940.285 or a violationviola- ofsurcharge a temporary restraining order or injunction issued under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.057.
SECTION 5.
814.76 (6) of the statutes is amended to tion of a temporary restraining order or injunction is- read:
sued under s.
814.76 (6) The domestic abuse surcharge under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.055.
948, including a crime specifiedSECTION in6. s.
814.80 (6) of the statutes is amended to specified in s.
read:
941.29 (1m) if the individual has814.80 been(6) convictedThe of,domestic adjudicatedabuse delinquentsurcharge for,under or found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect of, committing, soliciting, conspiring, or attempting to commit a violent felony, as defined in s.
has been convicted of, adjudicated delinquent for, or 971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.055.
found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect of, SECTION 7.
814.81 (6) of the statutes is amended to committing, soliciting, conspiring, or attempting to read:
commit a violent felony, as defined in s.
814.81 (6) The domestic abuse surcharge under s.
971.37 (1m) (c) 1.
or 973.055.
NotwithstandingNotwith- s.SECTION 8.
971.29,967.056 ifof anthe individualstatutes is chargedcreated withto astanding covereds. crime, a prosecutor may not dismiss or amend the charge without the approval of the court.
In971.29, theif applicationan toindividual theis court,charged thewith prosecutora shallread: state the reasons for the proposed amendment or dismissal.
Thecovered courtcrime, maya approveprosecutor themay applicationnot onlydismiss if the court finds that the proposed amendment or dismissalamend is967.056 consistentProsecution with the public’s interest in deterring the commission of coveredcertain crimescrimes. and consistent with the legislature’s intent expressed in sub.
(1) I N- the charge without the approval of the court.
In the ap- TENT .
The legislature intends to encourage the vigorous plication to the court, the prosecutor shall state the rea- * Section 991.11, ISCONSINSTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
XEvery act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the gov- ernor's partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.Y Wisconsin Act - 2 - 2025 Senate Bill 76 sons for the proposed amendment or dismissal.
The 971.38 (1) Except as provided in s.
967.055 (3) or court may approve the application only if the court finds 967.056 (4), the district attorney may require as a condi- that the proposed amendment or dismissal is consistent tion of any deferred prosecution program for any crime with the public[s interest in deterring the commission of that the defendant perform community service work for covered crimes and consistent with the legislature[s in- a public agency or a nonprofit charitable organization.
tent expressed in sub.
IfIf, during the course of a year, The number of hours of work required may not exceed a court approves at least one application inunder athis year,sub- thewhat courtwould shallbe submitreasonable toconsidering the appropriateseriousness standingsection committeesto dismiss or amend a charge of thea legislaturecovered undercrime, s.of the alleged offense.
13.172An (3)order -may 2026only Legislatureapply -if 5the -court LRB-2036/1shall CMH:emwsubmit SENATEto BILLthe 76appropriate SECTIONstanding 8com- anagreed annualto reportby detailing each application the courtdefendant approved that year and howthe eachorganization approvalor ismittees consistentof with the public’slegislature interestunder ands. the legislature’s intent.
13.172 (3) an annual agency.
The district attorney shall ensure that the defen- report detailing each application the court approved that dant is provided a written statement of the terms of the year and how each approval is consistent with the pub- community service order and that the community ser- lic[s interest and the legislature[s intent.
vice order is monitored.
A prosecutor may notS placeECTION a12. person in a deferred prosecution program if a complaint or information is filed that alleges the person committed a covered crime or if the person is charged with a covered crime.
S971.39 ECTION(1) 9.(intro.) of the statutes is not place a person in a deferred prosecution program if a amended to read:
968.075complaint (7)or (c)information ofis filed that alleges the statutesperson is971.39 created(1) to(intro.) read:Except as provided in s.
968.075967.055 (7)committed (c)a Acovered policycrime indicatingor howif the officeperson mayis bestcharged execute(3) theor intent967.056 (4), in counties having a population of s.with a covered crime.
less than 100,000, if a defendant is charged with a crime, SECTION 9.
968.075 (7) (c) of the statutes is created the district attorney, the department and a defendant to read:
may all enter into a deferred prosecution agreement 968.075 (7) (c) A policy indicating how the office which includes, but is not limited to, the following may best execute the intent of s.
Sconditions: ECTION 10.
SECTION 10.
S ECTION 11.13.
971.38 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:
971.38 (1) Except as provided in s.
967.055 (3) or 967.056 (4), the district attorney may require as a condition of any deferred prosecution program for any crime that the defendant perform community service work for a public agency or a nonprofit charitable organization.
The number of hours of work required may not exceed what would be reasonable considering the seriousness of the alleged offense.
An order may only apply if agreed to by the defendant and the organization or agency.
The district attorney shall ensure that the defendant is provided a written statement of the terms of the community service order and that the community service order is monitored.
S ECTION 12.
971.39 (1) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
971.39 (1) (intro.) Except as provided in s.
967.055 (3) or 967.056 (4), in counties having a population of less than 100,000, if a defendant is charged with a crime, the district attorney, the department and a defendant may all enter into a - 2026 Legislature - 6 - LRB-2036/1 CMH:emw SENATE BILL 76 S ECTION 12 deferred prosecution agreement which includes, but is not limited to, the following conditions:
SECTION 13.
(1)SECTION This11. act first applies to a complaint, information, or charge filed on the effective date of this subsection.
END971.38 )(1) of the statutes is amended (1) This act first applies to a complaint, information, to read:
or charge filed on the effective date of this subsection.
Show all 136 changed rows (96 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 10-31-2025
-
Presented to the Governor on 10-30-2025
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 43, Paired 2
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 43
-
Decision of the Chair appealed
-
Point of order that Assembly Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Udell
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Placed on calendar 10-14-2025 by Committee on Rules
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
-
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 4-22-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Hutton and Wimberger
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Hutton
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Hutton, Nass and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives B. Jacobson, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Krug, Moses, Murphy, Mursau and Wichgers
Sponsors
- B. Jacobson · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Brill · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Donovan · Cosponsor
- Duchow · Cosponsor
- Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Steve Nass · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Krug · Cosponsor
- Moses · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Cory Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- Rob Hutton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 52 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hutton, Rob Republican
Co-sponsors (16)
- B. Jacobson
- Behnke
- Brill
- Dittrich
- Donovan
- Duchow
- Gundrum
- Knodl
- Nass, Steve Republican
- Kreibich
- Krug
- Moses
- Murphy
- Mursau
- Wichgers
- Tomczyk, Cory Republican
Not signed on (115)
115 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 115 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 52 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 40 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 53 | 43 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 43% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Nay |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| DASSLER-ALFHEI | — | Nay |
| HABUSH SINYKIN | — | Nay |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Keyeski, Sarah | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Ratcliff, Melissa | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Wall, Jamie | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Cabral-Guevara, Rachael | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Tomczyk, Cory | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 76 do?
- An Act to repeal 971.37; to amend 20.410 (1) (gL), 20.437 (1) (hh), 814.75 (8), 814.75 (8m), 814.76 (6), 814.80 (6), 814.81 (6), 971.38 (1) and 971.39 (1) (intro.); to create 967.056 and 968.075 (7) (c) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 76?
- SB 76 is sponsored by B. Jacobson, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Gundrum, Knodl, Nass, Steve (Republican), Kreibich, Krug, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Wichgers, Tomczyk, Cory (Republican), and Hutton, Rob (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 76?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 26, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track SB 76?
- Track SB 76 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 76
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 76
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →