Relating to: impoundment of vehicles used in certain reckless driving offenses. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 65 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 65.
You're tracking SB 65
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 65 — Relating to: impoundment of vehicles used in certain reckless driving offenses. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
23 sponsors
1 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to amend 349.115 (1) and 349.115 (3); to create 349.115 (1m) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
67 added · 9 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to SB 65 expand the authority of local governments to impound vehicles involved in reckless driving incidents. Previously, only vehicles owned by individuals with prior reckless driving convictions and unpaid fines could be impounded, but now any vehicle used in such offenses can be impounded, regardless of ownership or the driver's history. Additionally, law enforcement must check if an impounded vehicle has been reported stolen. This change aims to enhance public safety by making it easier for authorities to address reckless driving.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0083/1LRB-2000/1 EVM:cdcEVM:emw&skw SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 65 MarchFebruary 13,21, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatANGGAARDSenators W ANGGAARD and T OMCZYK , cosponsored by Representatives D ONOVAN , RODRIGUEZ , ALLEN , DITTRICH, D UCHOW , GOODWIN , GUNDRUM , KNODL, M AXEY, MELOTIK, M URPHY, M URSAU, N OVAK, O'CONNOR , ORTI-VELEZ , ENTERMAN , IWOWARCZYK , TEFFEN , TITT, TUSLER and W ICHGERS .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendJudiciary theand billPublic asSafety. follows:
1.A N A CT to amend 349.115 (1) and 349.115 (3);
Pageto 2,create line349.115 5:(1m) of the statutes;
afterrelating XcitationYto: insert Xor making an arrestY.
2.impoundment of vehicles used in certain reckless driving offenses.
PageAnalysis 3,by linethe 8:Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a political subdivision may enact an ordinance authorizing law enforcement officers to impound vehicles used in reckless driving offenses if the person cited for reckless driving is the owner of the vehicle and the person has a prior reckless driving conviction for which a forfeiture was imposed that has not been fully paid.
deleteUnder XcitationYthis andbill, substitutesuch Xcitationan chargeY.ordinance may authorize the impoundment of any vehicle used in a reckless driving offense regardless of ownership of the vehicle or prior record of the operator.
The bill also provides that a local ordinance may authorize impounding such a vehicle until outstanding fines and forfeitures owed by the vehicle’s owner are fully paid.
Also under the bill, upon impounding a vehicle under such an ordinance, the law enforcement officer must attempt to determine if the vehicle has been reported as stolen, and if so, the officer or the impounding political subdivision must attempt to contact the owner.
If the vehicle is reported as stolen, the vehicle must be released to the owner without the payment of a fee or charge.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2000/1 EVM:emw&skw SENATE BILL 65 SECTION 1 For further information see the local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
349.115 (1) of the statutes is amended to read:
349.115 (1) A political subdivision may, by ordinance, authorize a law enforcement officer to impound any vehicle used in the commission of a violation of s.
346.62 or a local ordinance in strict conformity with s.
346.62 at the time of issuing a citation for the offense if the person cited is the owner of the vehicle and the person has a prior conviction for a violation of s.
346.62 or a local ordinance in strict conformity with s.
346.62 for which a forfeiture was imposed that has not been fully paid.
The ordinance may provide for impoundment of the vehicle until the person fully pays the prior forfeiture amount and reasonable costs of impounding the vehicle, including towing or other transportation costs and storage costs, and any outstanding fine or forfeiture owed by the owner of the vehicle are fully paid.
S ECTION 2.
349.115 (1m) of the statutes is created to read:
349.115 (1m) Upon impounding a vehicle under sub.
(1), a law enforcement officer shall make a reasonable effort to determine if the vehicle has been reported as stolen.
If the officer determines that the vehicle has been reported as stolen, the officer or political subdivision shall make a reasonable attempt to contact the owner.
Notwithstanding sub.
(2), the political subdivision shall return to its owner a vehicle reported as stolen and impounded under sub.
(1) without the payment of a fee or charge.
If a vehicle reported as stolen remains unclaimed for more than 60 days after impoundment, the political subdivision may dispose of the vehicle - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2000/1 EVM:emw&skw SENATE BILL 65 S ECTION 2 following the same procedure as provided for disposing of an abandoned vehicle under s.
342.40.
SECTION 3.
349.115 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
349.115 (3) A Subject to sub.
(1m), a political subdivision that has impounded a vehicle under sub.
(1) may dispose of the vehicle by following the same procedure as provided for disposing of an abandoned vehicle under s.
342.40 if the impounded vehicle remains unclaimed for more than 90 days after the disposition of the citation for which the vehicle was impounded.
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor
-
Representative Billings added as a cosponsor
-
Representative Brown added as a cosponsor
-
Representative Doyle added as a cosponsor
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 1
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 1
-
Executive action taken
-
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Donovan, Rodriguez, Allen, Dittrich, Duchow, Goodwin, Gundrum, Knodl, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Ortiz-Velez, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Steffen, Tittl, Tusler and Wichgers
Sponsors
- Donovan · Cosponsor
- Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- Allen · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Duchow · Cosponsor
- Goodwin · Cosponsor
- Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Maxey · Cosponsor
- Melotik · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- Novak · Cosponsor
- O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Ortiz-Velez · Cosponsor
- Penterman · Cosponsor
- Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Steffen · Cosponsor
- Tittl · Cosponsor
- Tusler · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Cory Tomczyk · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
Co-sponsors (22)
- Donovan
- Rodriguez
- Allen
- Dittrich
- Duchow
- Goodwin
- Gundrum
- Knodl
- Maxey
- Melotik
- Murphy
- Mursau
- Novak
- O'Connor
- Ortiz-Velez
- Penterman
- Piwowarczyk
- Steffen
- Tittl
- Tusler
- Wichgers
- Tomczyk, Cory Republican
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 65 do?
- An Act to amend 349.115 (1) and 349.115 (3); to create 349.115 (1m) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 65?
- SB 65 is sponsored by Donovan, Rodriguez, Allen, Dittrich, Duchow, Goodwin, Gundrum, Knodl, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Ortiz-Velez, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Steffen, Tittl, Tusler, Wichgers, Wanggaard, Van (Republican), and Tomczyk, Cory (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 65?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 65?
- Track SB 65 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 65
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 65
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →