Relating to: referendum questions for certain referenda that affect property taxes. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 58 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 58.
You're tracking SB 58
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 58 — Relating to: referendum questions for certain referenda that affect property taxes. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to renumber and amend 67.05 (3) (d); to amend 38.16 (3) (br) 3., 66.0602 (4) (c) and 121.91 (3) (c); to create 67.05 (3) (d) 3., 4. and 5. of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill requires additional information on referendum ballots related to property tax levies, including estimates of the impact on median-valued homes.
-
67.05 (3) (d)
The estimated interest rate and total amount of interest accruing on the maximum amount of bonds issued for the longest period authorized under the referendum. If the interest rate is a variable rate, the statement shall specify the amount of the interest accruing calculated by using the lowest rate during the term for which the rate is applicable and the amount of the interest accruing calculated by using the highest rate during the term for which the rate is applicable.
Increases transparency regarding bond costs by requiring estimated interest rates and amounts on referendum ballots.
-
67.05 (3) (d)
Any fees that will be incurred if the bonds are defeased.
Ensures that voters are informed about potential fees associated with bond defeasance.
-
67.05 (3) (d)
A good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the municipality if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
Mandates that ballot questions include estimates of the tax impact on median homes, enhancing voter understanding of financial consequences.
-
38.16 (3) (br) 3.
The question shall also provide a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference, as defined in s. 67.05 (3) (d) 5., that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the district if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
Adds a requirement for tax impact estimates on ballot questions for school district referenda.
-
66.0602 (4) (c)
The question shall also provide a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference, as defined in s. 67.05 (3) (d) 5., that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the district if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
Requires political subdivisions to include property tax impact estimates on property tax levy referendum ballots.
-
121.91 (3) (c)
The question shall also provide a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference, as defined in s. 67.05 (3) (d) 5., that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the district if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
Ensures school district referendum ballots include estimates of tax impacts on median homes.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
-
Introduced by Senators Cabral-Guevara, Jacque, Kapenga and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Allen, Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Murphy, O'Connor and Wichgers
Sponsors
- Allen · Cosponsor
- Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Brill · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Goeben · Cosponsor
- Green · Cosponsor
- Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Maxey · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Primary
- André Jacque · Cosponsor
- Chris Kapenga · Cosponsor
- Steve Nass · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cabral-Guevara, Rachael Republican
Co-sponsors (17)
- Allen
- Piwowarczyk
- Behnke
- Brill
- Dittrich
- Goeben
- Green
- Gundrum
- Knodl
- Kreibich
- Maxey
- Murphy
- O'Connor
- Wichgers
- Jacque, André Republican
- Kapenga, Chris Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 58 do?
- An Act to renumber and amend 67.05 (3) (d); to amend 38.16 (3) (br) 3., 66.0602 (4) (c) and 121.91 (3) (c); to create 67.05 (3) (d) 3., 4. and 5. of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 58?
- SB 58 is sponsored by Allen, Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Murphy, O'Connor, Wichgers, Cabral-Guevara, Rachael (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Kapenga, Chris (Republican), and Nass, Steve (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 58?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 21, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 58?
- Track SB 58 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 58
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 58
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →