Relating to: representations depicting nudity and providing a penalty.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 33 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 33.
You're tracking SB 33
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 33 — Relating to: representations depicting nudity and providing a penalty.
Last action — Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 12, 2025. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
21 sponsors
1 primary, 20 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to create 942.09 (1) (e), 942.09 (2) (am) 4. and 942.09 (3m) (a) 3. of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
54 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Senate Bill 33 clarified that it is a Class I felony to distribute deep fakes—synthetic images that depict nudity—if the person responsible is aware that the representation could harm or intimidate the person shown. This change ensures that individuals are held accountable based on their knowledge of the impact their actions may have. By including this requirement, the bill aims to provide clearer guidelines on intent, thereby better protecting victims from malicious use of technology in creating deep fakes.
CORRECTED COPY - 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0073/1LRB-0058/1 MJW:cdcMJW:cjs SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 33 MarchFebruary 12, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatACQUE.Senators J ACQUE , TOMCZYK and H ABUSH SINYKIN , cosponsored by Representatives B.
AtJACOBSON the, locationsW indicated,ICHGERS amend, theALLEN, billA asNDERSON follows:, BEHNKE , RILL , ROOKS , DITTRICH, GUNDRUM , REIBICH , MAXEY, M OSES, M URPHY, M URSAU , INICKI, UBECK , USLER and UDELL .
1.Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
PageA 2,N lineA 12:CT to create 942.09 (1) (e), 942.09 (2) (am) 4.
afterand XifY942.09 insert(3m) Xthe(a) actor3. knows thatY.
ENDof )the statutes;
relating to:
representations depicting nudity and providing a penalty.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, it is generally a Class I felony to capture or distribute representations depicting nudity without the consent of the person depicted.
This bill expands the prohibition to include what are known as “deep fakes.” The bill provides that it is a Class I felony to post, publish, distribute, or exhibit a synthetic intimate representation (commonly known as a “deep fake”) of an identifiable person with intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate that person.
Under the bill, a synthetic intimate representation is defined as a representation generated using technological means that uses an identifiable person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic to depict an intimate representation of that person, regardless of whether the representation includes components that are artificial, legally generated, or generally accessible.
Under current law, it is a Class A misdemeanor to publish or post a private representation, which is a sexually explicit representation that is intended by the person depicted in the representation to be possessed or viewed only by the persons with whom it was directly shared, without consent of the person depicted.
This bill - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-0058/1 MJW:cjs SENATE BILL 33 SECTION 1 provides that it is also a Class A misdemeanor to reproduce such representations without that person’s consent.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
942.09 (1) (e) of the statutes is created to read:
942.09 (1) (e) “Synthetic intimate representation” means a representation generated using technological means that uses an identifiable person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic to depict an intimate representation of that person, regardless of whether the representation includes components that are artificial, legally generated, or generally accessible.
SECTION 2.
942.09 (2) (am) 4.
of the statutes is created to read:
942.09 (2) (am) 4.
Posts, publishes, distributes, or exhibits a synthetic intimate representation of an identifiable person with intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate that person.
SECTION 3.
942.09 (3m) (a) 3.
of the statutes is created to read:
942.09 (3m) (a) 3.
Makes a reproduction of a private representation, if the person depicted in the reproduction did not consent to the making of the reproduction.
(END)
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor
-
Published 10-3-2025
-
Report approved by the Governor on 10-2-2025. 2025 Wisconsin Act 34
-
Presented to the Governor on 10-2-2025
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Representative Stubbs added as a cosponsor
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Withdrawn from Committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 9-11-2025
-
Representative O'Connor added as a cosponsor
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
-
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Senator Ratcliff added as a coauthor
-
Placed on calendar 5-15-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Jacque
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 1
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jacque
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators Jacque, Tomczyk and Habush Sinykin; cosponsored by Representatives B. Jacobson, Wichgers, Allen, Anderson, Behnke, Brill, Brooks, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kreibich, Maxey, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Sinicki, Subeck, Tusler and Udell
Sponsors
- Habush Sinykin · Cosponsor
- B. Jacobson · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Allen · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Brill · Cosponsor
- Brooks · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Maxey · Cosponsor
- Moses · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- Sinicki · Cosponsor
- Subeck · Cosponsor
- Tusler · Cosponsor
- Udell · Cosponsor
- André Jacque · Primary
- Cory Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- J ANDERSON · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 20 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jacque, André Republican
Co-sponsors (20)
- Habush Sinykin
- B. Jacobson
- Wichgers
- Allen
- Behnke
- Brill
- Brooks
- Dittrich
- Gundrum
- Kreibich
- Maxey
- Moses
- Murphy
- Mursau
- Sinicki
- Subeck
- Tusler
- Udell
- Tomczyk, Cory Republican
- ANDERSON, J
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| DASSLER-ALFHEI | — | Yea |
| HABUSH SINYKIN | — | Yea |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Yea |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Yea |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Yea |
| Keyeski, Sarah | Democrat | Yea |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Yea |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Yea |
| Ratcliff, Melissa | Democrat | Yea |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Yea |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Yea |
| Wall, Jamie | Democrat | Yea |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Yea |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Cabral-Guevara, Rachael | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Tomczyk, Cory | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 33 do?
- An Act to create 942.09 (1) (e), 942.09 (2) (am) 4. and 942.09 (3m) (a) 3. of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 33?
- SB 33 is sponsored by Habush Sinykin, B. Jacobson, Wichgers, Allen, Behnke, Brill, Brooks, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kreibich, Maxey, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Sinicki, Subeck, Tusler, Udell, Jacque, André (Republican), Tomczyk, Cory (Republican), and ANDERSON, J.
- What is the current status of SB 33?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 12, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track SB 33?
- Track SB 33 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 33
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 33
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →