Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 7 D cosponsors

AB 1083 — Relating to: eliminating recovery by the state for birth expenses paid through the Medical Assistance program. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Not enough signal yet

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to amend 49.45 (19) (a), 49.45 (19) (c), 767.804 (3) (d) 1., 767.805 (4) (d) 1. and 767.89 (3) (e) 1.; to create 49.22 (9m) of the statutes;

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill prohibits the state from seeking recovery of birth expenses from fathers for children born to mothers who were recipients of Medical Assistance at the time of birth.

  • 49.22 (9m)

    Neither the department nor its designee may seek recovery from an alleged father of pregnancy or birth expenses paid by the state under the Medical Assistance program on behalf of an unmarried person who gave birth and who was a recipient of Medical Assistance at the time of the birth.

    This creates a new provision preventing recovery of birth expenses from fathers.

  • 49.45 (19) (a)

    a person shall, notwithstanding other provisions of the statutes, be deemed to have assigned to the state, by applying for or receiving medical assistance, any rights to medical support or other payment of medical expenses from any other person, including rights to unpaid amounts accrued at the time of application for medical assistance as well as any rights to support accruing during the time for which medical assistance is paid. → a person shall, except as provided in par. (c), be deemed to have assigned to the state, by applying for or receiving medical assistance, any rights to medical support or other payment of medical expenses from any other person, including rights to unpaid amounts accrued at the time of application for medical assistance as well as any rights to support accruing during the time for which medical assistance is paid.

    This change clarifies that the assignment of medical support rights does not apply in circumstances covered under the new provision.

  • 49.45 (19) (c)

    The state may seek recovery of birth expenses that may be recovered by the state under this subsection are the birth expenses incurred by the health maintenance organization or other prepaid health care plan. → The state may not seek recovery of birth expenses incurred by the health maintenance organization or other prepaid health care plan.

    This change prevents the state from seeking recovery of birth expenses associated with mothers who received Medical Assistance.

  • 767.804 (3) (d) 1.

    An order establishing the amount of the father’s obligation to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother’s pregnancy and the child’s birth. → An order establishing the amount of the father’s obligation to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother’s pregnancy and the child’s birth, except that the court may not order a father to pay expenses under this subsection for the recovery of expenses paid by the state under the Medical Assistance program on behalf of an unmarried person who gave birth and who was a recipient of Medical Assistance at the time of the birth.

    This change prohibits courts from ordering fathers to pay recovery of expenses paid by the state for birth.

  • 767.805 (4) (d) 1.

    An order establishing the amount of the father’s obligation to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother’s pregnancy and the child’s birth. → An order establishing the amount of the father’s obligation to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother’s pregnancy and the child’s birth, except that the court may not order a father to pay expenses under this subsection for the recovery of expenses paid by the state under the Medical Assistance program on behalf of an unmarried person who gave birth and who was a recipient of Medical Assistance at the time of the birth.

    This change adds a prohibition against requiring fathers to pay certain state-paid expenses.

  • 767.89 (3) (e) 1.

    An order establishing the amount of the father’s obligation to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother’s pregnancy and the child’s birth. → An order establishing the amount of the father’s obligation to pay or contribute to the reasonable expenses of the mother’s pregnancy and the child’s birth, except that the court may not order a father to pay expenses under this subsection for the recovery of expenses paid by the state under the Medical Assistance program on behalf of an unmarried person who gave birth and who was a recipient of Medical Assistance at the time of the birth.

    This amendment ensures consistency across relevant statutes by prohibiting orders for recovery of specified costs.

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Representative Mayadev added as a coauthor

  3. Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  4. Read first time and referred to Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care

  5. Introduced by Representatives Stubbs, Moore Omokunde, Arney, Goodwin, Hong, Sinicki and Palmeri; cosponsored by Senators L. Johnson, Roys, Ratcliff, Hesselbein and Larson

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (11)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1083 do?
An Act to amend 49.45 (19) (a), 49.45 (19) (c), 767.804 (3) (d) 1., 767.805 (4) (d) 1. and 767.89 (3) (e) 1.; to create 49.22 (9m) of the statutes;
Who sponsors AB 1083?
AB 1083 is sponsored by Moore Omokunde, Roys, Ratcliff, Hesselbein, Larson, Stubbs, Shelia (Democrat), Arney, Margaret (Democrat), Goodwin, Russell (Democrat), Hong, Francesca (Democrat), Sinicki, Christine (Democrat), Palmeri, Lori (Democrat), and Johnson, Tara (Democrat).
What is the current status of AB 1083?
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track AB 1083?
Track AB 1083 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1083

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1083

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →