Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: To Executive 5 R cosponsors

AB 880 — Relating to: nuisance actions against racing facilities.

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 16, 2026. It awaits signature.

Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on April 08, 2026.

Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence
  • To Executive

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

An Act to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

29 added · 70 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended bill AB 880 introduces new rules regarding nuisance claims against racing facilities in Wisconsin. It specifies that only property owners living within a five-mile radius of a racing facility can file such claims, and they cannot claim the facility is a nuisance if it was already operating before they bought their property or made improvements. This change aims to limit the number of nuisance lawsuits that racing facilities might face, which could help protect their operations and promote continuity in competitive motorsports.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-5526/1 JK:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 880 January 16, 2026 - Introduced by Representatives M URSAU , BRILL, KREIBICH , D UCHOW and K URTZ , cosponsored by Senators T OMCZYK and C ABRAL - G UEVARA .
Date of enactment:
Referred to Committee on Local Government.
Assembly Bill 880 Date of publication*:
A N A CT to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Current law, provides that any person, county, city, village, or town may commence an action to abate a public nuisance to the extent necessary to protect the complainant’s rights and to obtain an injunction to prevent injuries to the complainant.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in sen- (a) The action alleging that the racing facility is a ate and assembly, do enact as follows:
However, current law provides a number of restrictions to commencing such an action.
public or private nuisance is commenced by a person SECTION 1.
For example, an agricultural use or practice may not be found to be a nuisance if, generally, the use or practice is conducted on land that has been used without substantial interruption as agricultural land and the agricultural use or practice does not present a substantial threat to public health or safety.
66.0443 of the statutes is created to that owns real property that is within a 5-mile radius of read:
Under this bill, no racing facility may be found to be a public nuisance if all of the following apply:
the perimeter of the property on which the racing facil- 66.0443 Racing facilities.
1.
No political subdivision ity is located.
The action alleging that the racing facility is a public nuisance is commenced by a person that owns real property that is within a five-mile radius of the perimeter of the racing facility.
(b) The racing facility was constructed or in opera- may create a private cause of action that is inconsistent tion before the person commencing the action pur- with the limitations under s.
2.
The racing facility was constructed before the person commencing the nuisance action purchased, or made improvements to, the real property described above.
The bill defines “racing facility” as a racetrack, regardless of whether the racetrack is permanent or seasonal, and includes any spectator areas, garages, and - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5526/1 JK:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 880 SECTION 1 associated grounds, buildings, or appurtenances used to conduct competitive motorsports races.
The bill also prohibits a political subdivision from regulating the operation of a racing facility in a manner that is inconsistent with the other provisions under the bill.
Under current law, “political subdivision” means a city, village, town, or county.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
66.0443 of the statutes is created to read:
66.0443 Racing facilities.
(1) In this section, “racing facility” has the meaning given in s.
823.086 (1).
(2) No political subdivision may regulate the operation of a racing facility in a manner that is inconsistent with s.
S ECTION 2.
chased, or made improvements to, the real property de- SECTION 2.
823.086 of the statutes is created to read:
823.086 of the statutes is created to scribed under par.
823.086 Actions against racing facilities.
(1) In this section, “racing facility” means a racetrack, regardless of whether the racetrack is permanent or seasonal, and includes any spectator areas, garages, and associated grounds, buildings, or appurtenances used to conduct competitive motorsports races.
(2) No racing facility may be found to be a public nuisance if all of the following apply:
(a) The action alleging that the racing facility is a public nuisance is commenced by a person that owns real property that is within a 5-mile radius of the perimeter of the property on which the racing facility is located.
(b) The racing facility was constructed or in operation before the person commencing the action purchased, or made improvements to, the real property described under par.
- 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-5526/1 JK:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 880 SECTION 2 (3) The prohibition under sub.
read:
(2) applies to a racing facility regardless of changes to the size of the racing facility or to the scope, configuration, technology, or type of racing conducted at the racing facility made after the person commencing the action purchased, or made improvements to, the real property described under par.
823.086 Actions against racing facilities.
(a) if the changes made to the racing facility were not made in violation of any legal restriction.
(1) In (3) The prohibition under sub.
S ECTION 3.
(2) does not apply if the racing facility makes a substantial and material ex- this section:
pansion of operations that results in a significant in- (a) “Person” does not include a county, city, village crease in the overall intensity of use of the facility, in- or town.
cluding a demonstrable increase in the number of racing (b) “Racing facility” means a racetrack, regardless event days beyond historical patterns of operation exist- of whether the racetrack is permanent or seasonal, and ing at the time the person commencing an action ac- includes any spectator areas, garages, and associated quired or improved the person’s property.
grounds, buildings, or appurtenances used to conduct SECTION 3.
competitive motorsports races.
823.086 first applies to actions commenced on the effective date of this subsection.
823.086 first applies to ac- (2) No racing facility may be found to be a public or tions commenced on the effective date of this private nuisance if all of the following apply:
(END)
subsection.
* Section 991.11, ISCONSINSTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
Previous
Latest
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the gov- ernor's partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2026

  4. Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026

  5. Report correctly enrolled on 3-19-2026

  6. Received from Senate concurred in

  7. Ordered immediately messaged

  8. Read a third time and concurred in

  9. Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  10. Ordered to a third reading

  11. Read a second time

  12. Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Available for scheduling

  14. Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  15. Executive action taken

  16. Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Local Government

  17. Received from Assembly

  18. Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Read a third time and passed

  20. Rules suspended

  21. Ordered to a third reading

  22. Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  23. Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  24. Read a second time

  25. Made a special order of business at 11:41 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  26. Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Mursau

  27. Referred to committee on Rules

  28. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  29. Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  30. Executive action taken

  31. Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau

  32. Representative Gundrum added as a coauthor

  33. Public hearing held

  34. Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government

  35. Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Brill, Kreibich, Duchow and Kurtz; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk and Cabral-Guevara

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (125)

125 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 125 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 880 do?
An Act to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;
Who sponsors AB 880?
AB 880 is sponsored by Tomczyk, Cabral-Guevara, Kurtz, Tony (Republican), Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Brill, Lindee (Republican), and Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 880?
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 16, 2026. It awaits signature.
Where can I track AB 880?
Track AB 880 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 880

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 880

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →