AB 880 — Relating to: nuisance actions against racing facilities.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 16, 2026. It awaits signature.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on April 08, 2026.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
29 added · 70 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill AB 880 introduces new rules regarding nuisance claims against racing facilities in Wisconsin. It specifies that only property owners living within a five-mile radius of a racing facility can file such claims, and they cannot claim the facility is a nuisance if it was already operating before they bought their property or made improvements. This change aims to limit the number of nuisance lawsuits that racing facilities might face, which could help protect their operations and promote continuity in competitive motorsports.
-Date 2026of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-5526/1 JK:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 880 January 16, 2026 - Introduced by Representatives M URSAU , BRILL, KREIBICH , D UCHOW and K URTZ , cosponsored by Senators T OMCZYK and C ABRAL - G UEVARA .
ReferredAssembly toBill Committee880 onDate Localof Government.publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Currentrepresented law,in providessen- that(a) anyThe person, county, city, village, or town may commence an action toalleging abatethat a public nuisance to the extentracing necessaryfacility tois protecta theate complainant’s rights and toassembly, obtaindo anenact injunctionas tofollows: prevent injuries to the complainant.
However,public currentor lawprivate providesnuisance ais numbercommenced ofby restrictionsa toperson commencingSECTION such1. an action.
For66.0443 example,of an agricultural use or practice may not be found to be a nuisance if, generally, the usestatutes or practice is conductedcreated onto land that hasowns beenreal usedproperty withoutthat substantialis interruptionwithin as agricultural land and the agricultural use or practice does not present a substantial5-mile threatradius toof publicread: health or safety.
Underthe thisperimeter bill,of nothe racingproperty facilityon maywhich bethe foundracing tofacil- be66.0443 aRacing publicfacilities. nuisance if all of the following apply:
1.No political subdivision ity is located.
(b) The action alleging that the racing facility iswas aconstructed publicor nuisancein isopera- commencedmay bycreate a personprivate thatcause ownsof realaction property that is withininconsistent ation five-milebefore radiusthe ofperson commencing the perimeteraction ofpur- with the racinglimitations facility.under s.
2.
The racing facility was constructed before the person commencing the nuisance action purchased, or made improvements to, the real property described above.
The bill defines “racing facility” as a racetrack, regardless of whether the racetrack is permanent or seasonal, and includes any spectator areas, garages, and - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-5526/1 JK:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 880 SECTION 1 associated grounds, buildings, or appurtenances used to conduct competitive motorsports races.
The bill also prohibits a political subdivision from regulating the operation of a racing facility in a manner that is inconsistent with the other provisions under the bill.
Under current law, “political subdivision” means a city, village, town, or county.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
66.0443 of the statutes is created to read:
66.0443 Racing facilities.
(1) In this section, “racing facility” has the meaning given in s.
823.086 (1).
(2) No political subdivision may regulate the operation of a racing facility in a manner that is inconsistent with s.
Schased, ECTIONor made improvements to, the real property de- SECTION 2.
823.086 of the statutes is created to read:scribed under par.
823.086 Actions against racing facilities.
(1) In this section, “racing facility” means a racetrack, regardless of whether the racetrack is permanent or seasonal, and includes any spectator areas, garages, and associated grounds, buildings, or appurtenances used to conduct competitive motorsports races.
(2) No racing facility may be found to be a public nuisance if all of the following apply:
(a) The action alleging that the racing facility is a public nuisance is commenced by a person that owns real property that is within a 5-mile radius of the perimeter of the property on which the racing facility is located.
(b) The racing facility was constructed or in operation before the person commencing the action purchased, or made improvements to, the real property described under par.
-read: 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-5526/1 JK:ajk&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 880 SECTION 2 (3) The prohibition under sub.
(2)823.086 appliesActions toagainst a racing facilityfacilities. regardless of changes to the size of the racing facility or to the scope, configuration, technology, or type of racing conducted at the racing facility made after the person commencing the action purchased, or made improvements to, the real property described under par.
(a)(1) ifIn the(3) changesThe madeprohibition tounder thesub. racing facility were not made in violation of any legal restriction.
S(2) ECTIONdoes 3.not apply if the racing facility makes a substantial and material ex- this section:
pansion of operations that results in a significant in- (a) “Person” does not include a county, city, village crease in the overall intensity of use of the facility, in- or town.
cluding a demonstrable increase in the number of racing (b) “Racing facility” means a racetrack, regardless event days beyond historical patterns of operation exist- of whether the racetrack is permanent or seasonal, and ing at the time the person commencing an action ac- includes any spectator areas, garages, and associated quired or improved the person’s property.
grounds, buildings, or appurtenances used to conduct SECTION 3.
competitive motorsports races.
823.086 first applies to actionsac- (2) No racing facility may be found to be a public or tions commenced on the effective date of this subsection.private nuisance if all of the following apply:
(END)subsection.
* Section 991.11, ISCONSINSTATUTES:
Effective date of acts.
Show all 41 changed lines (1 more)
“Every act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the gov- ernor's partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 2 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2026
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-19-2026
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Local Government
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Made a special order of business at 11:41 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Mursau
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 2
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau
-
Representative Gundrum added as a coauthor
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government
-
Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Brill, Kreibich, Duchow and Kurtz; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk and Cabral-Guevara
Sponsors
- Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- Cabral-Guevara · Cosponsor
- Tony Kurtz · Cosponsor
- Cindi Duchow · Cosponsor
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Lindee Brill · Cosponsor
- Jeffrey Mursau · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
Co-sponsors (6)
- Tomczyk
- Cabral-Guevara
- Kurtz, Tony Republican
- Duchow, Cindi Republican
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Brill, Lindee Republican
Not signed on (125)
125 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 125 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 880 do?
- An Act to create 66.0443 and 823.086 of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 880?
- AB 880 is sponsored by Tomczyk, Cabral-Guevara, Kurtz, Tony (Republican), Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Brill, Lindee (Republican), and Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 880?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 16, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track AB 880?
- Track AB 880 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 880
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 880
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →