Relating to: prohibiting state contracting with certain business entities and providing a penalty. (FE)
This bill aims to prevent the state from entering into contracts with specific foreign adversaries, including China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. It contains definitions and exclusions related to what constitutes a foreign adversary.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 662 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 662.
You're tracking AB 662
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 662 — Relating to: prohibiting state contracting with certain business entities and providing a penalty. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced November 19, 2025. It awaits signature.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on April 03, 2026.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
19 sponsors
1 primary, 18 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (14 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
Prohibits state contracts with certain foreign entities listed as adversaries.
This bill aims to prevent the state from entering into contracts with specific foreign adversaries, including China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. It contains definitions and exclusions related to what constitutes a foreign adversary.
Summary
An Act to create 20.933 of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
69 added · 140 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Assembly Bill 662 introduce provisions that prevent the state of Wisconsin from entering into contracts with certain businesses linked to foreign adversaries, particularly the People's Republic of China. Specifically, the bill now clarifies what constitutes a "prohibited business entity" based on its location and ownership, expanding the definition to include organizations that are controlled or majority-owned by foreign governmental entities. This change is significant as it aims to protect state interests by ensuring that taxpayer dollars are not used to fund businesses that may pose security risks.
-Date 2026of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-1392/1 MPG:cdc&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 662 November 19, 2025 - Introduced by RepresentativesALLMAN , EHNKE , CALLAHAN , DITTRICH, G REEN, K NODL , KREIBICH, KURTZ , M OSES, M URPHY, M URSAU , O'CONNOR , PIWOWARCZYK and W ICHGERS, cosponsored by Senators TESTIN, JACQUE , MARKLEIN , NASS and T OMCZYK .
ReferredAssembly toBill Committee662 onDate Stateof Affairs.publication*:
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to create 20.933 of the statutes;
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill prohibits any state agencyof orWisconsin, otherrepresented body in Wisconsinsen- stateincluded government,in including the legislaturelist andof theforeign courtsadversaries (stateunder agency),15 fromCFR contractingate withand certainassembly, prohibiteddo businessenact entities.as follows:
Specifically,791.4, theas billamended prohibits state agencies from contractingtime withto anytime. organization or enterprise whether or not operated for profit that satisfies any of the following:
(e) “Prohibited business entity” means a business SECTION 1.
Is primarily domiciled, incorporated, issued, or listed in a foreign country of concern.
2.
Is headquartered in a foreign country of concern.
3.
Has its principal place of business in a foreign country of concern.
4.
Is controlled or is majority-owned by the government of the People’s Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese military, or an instrumentality of any of the foregoing, including the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China and the National Council for Social Security Fund of the People’s Republic of China.
5.
Is a subsidiary of any of the business entities described above.
6.
Sells the final products of a business entity described above to a state agency.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1392/1 MPG:cdc&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 662 SECTION 1 The bill defines “foreign country of concern” as a country designated by the U.S.
Department of Commerce as a foreign adversary of the United States.
Those countries currently include China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela under the regime of Nicolás Maduro.
Additionally, the bill provides that no contract between any person and a state agency shall be valid, binding, and enforceable unless the person provides prior written certification to the state agency that the person is not a prohibited business entity and that the person has made every effort to ensure that the goods or services provided under the contract did not originate with a prohibited business entity.
Moreover, if any person contracting with a state agency becomes a prohibited business entity, the person is for that reason considered to be in breach of contract, and the person must provide written notification of the breach to the state agency.
The state agency may then terminate the contract and may pursue all appropriate legal remedies for the breach.
The bill charges the Department of Administration with receiving and investigating complaints of alleged violations of the bill’s contracting requirements.
If DOA determines that a person has violated the bill’s requirements, all of the following apply:
1.
The person is liable for a forfeiture equal to the greater of $250,000, an amount equal to twice the amount of the value of the relevant contract, or an amount equal to the total amount of all pecuniary losses suffered by any state as a result of the violation.
2.
The person is ineligible to contract with a state agency for five years following the date of DOA’s determination of a violation.
Finally, the bill authorizes the Attorney General to enforce the bill’s requirements in court.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
entity that satisfies any of the following:
(a) “Business entity” means any organization or enterprise engaged in commerce, whether or not operated for profit.
(b) “Contract” means to become a party to any agreement for the acquisition - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-1392/1 MPG:cdc&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 662 SECTION 1 by purchase, lease, or barter of property, goods, or services for the direct benefit or use of any of the parties.
(c) “Department” means the department of administration.
(d) “Foreign country of concern” means a foreign adversary designated under 15 CFR 791.4.
(e) “Prohibited business entity” means a business entity that satisfies any of the following:
Is primarily domiciled, incorporated, issued, or (a) “Business entity” means any organization or en- listed inwithin athe foreignboundaries of a country ofor concern.other terri- terprise engaged in commerce, whether or not operated tory controlled by a foreign adversary.
Show all 99 changed lines (59 more)
for profit.
Is headquartered inwithin the boundaries of a foreigncoun- countrytry ofor concern.other territory controlled by a foreign adversary.
(b) “Contract” means to become a party to any agreement for the acquisition by purchase, lease, or 3.
Has its principal place of business inwithin athe foreignbarter of property, goods, or services for the direct bene- boundaries of a country or other territory controlled by fit or use of concern.any of the parties.
4.a foreign adversary.
Is(c) controlled“Department” ormeans is majority-owned by the governmentdepartment of the4. People’s Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese military, or an instrumentality of any of the foregoing, including the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China and the National Council for Social Security Fund of the People’s Republic of China.
Is controlled or is majority-owned by the govern- administration.
ment of the People’s Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese military, or an instru- (d) 1.
Except as provided under subd.
2., “foreign adversary” means any of the following:
mentality of any of the foregoing, including the State- a.
The People’s Republic of China, including the owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commis- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the sion of the State Council of the People’s Republic of Macau Special Administrative Region.
China and the National Council for Social Security b.
The Republic of Cuba.
Fund of the People’s Republic of China.
c.
The Islamic Republic of Iran.
Is a subsidiary of a business entity that satisfies subd.d.
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
subd.
e.
The Russian Federation.
Sells the final products of a business entity describedde- inf. subd.
The Venezuelan regime of Nicolás Maduro.
scribed in subd.
(f)2. “State agency” means an association, authority, board, department, commission, independent agency, institution, office, society, system, or other body - 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-1392/1 MPG:cdc&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 662 SECTION 1 in state government created or authorized to be created by the constitution or any law, including the legislature and the courts.
(g)“Foreign “Subsidiary”adversary” meansdoes anot businessinclude entityany thatcoun- is(f) majority“State owned,agency” controlled,means oran operatedassociation, byauthority, anothertry, businessgovernment, entity.regime, or person specified under subd.
(2)board, PROHIBITEDdepartment, CONTRACTScommission, .independent agency, 1.
(a)if Nothe country, government, regime, or person is not institution, office, society, system, or other body in state ernor's partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.” Wisconsin Act - 2 - 2025 Assembly Bill 662 government created or authorized to be created by the are not obtainable by the state agency mayby contractother withreason- aconstitution prohibitedor businessany entity.law, including the legislature and the able means.
(b)courts. No contract between any person and a state agency shall be valid, binding, and enforceable unless the person provides prior written certification to the state agency that the person is not a prohibited business entity and that the person has made every effort to ensure that the goods or services being contracted for do not originate from a prohibited business entity.
A(b) The harm to the state agencyin mayfailing relyto onexecute suchthe certification(g) without“Subsidiary” furthermeans investigation.a business entity that is ma- contract outweighs the public interests served by the jority owned, controlled, or operated by another busi- prohibition under sub.
(c) If any person contracting with a state agency becomes a prohibited business entity, the person shall be considered for that reason to have breached the contract, and the person shall without delay provide written notification of the breach to the state agency.
The state agency may terminate the contract and may pursue all appropriate legal remedies for the breach.
(3) EXEMPTION .
Subsection (2) does not prohibit a contract to which all of the following apply:
(a) The goods or services offered under the contract are not obtainable by the state agency by other reasonable means.
(b) The harm to the state in failing to execute the contract outweighs the public interests served by the prohibition under sub.
-ness 2026entity. Legislature - 5 - LRB-1392/1 MPG:cdc&cjs ASSEMBLY BILL 662 SECTION 1 (c) The contract is approved by the department.
(4)(c) CThe OMPLAINTScontract ;FORFEITURESis .approved by the department.
Any(2) personP mayROHIBITED fileCONTRACTS a. complaint with the department alleging a violation of sub.
(a) No state agency (4) C OMPLAINTS ;
FORFEITURES .
Any person may file a complaint with the department alleging a violation may contract with a prohibited business entity.
(b) No contract between any person and a state of sub.
The agency shall be valid, binding, and enforceable unless department shall investigate each complaint.
If upon investigationin- the person provides prior written certification to the vestigation the department determines a person has violatedvio- lated sub.
state agency that the person is not a prohibited business (a) The person shall be liable for a forfeiture equal entity and that the person has made every effort to en- sure that the goods or services being contracted for do to the greater of the following, as determined by the department:not originate from a prohibited business entity.
A state department:
agency may rely on such certification without further 2.
An amount equal to twice the amount of the value ofinvestigation. the contract on which the person submitted a bid or proposal.
of the contract on which the person submitted a bid or (c) If any person contracting with a state agency be- comes a prohibited business entity, the person shall be proposal.
An amount equal to the total amount of all pecuniarypecu- considered for that reason to have breached the contract, niary losses suffered by any state as a result of such and the person shall without delay provide written noti- violation.
(b)fication Theof personthe isbreach ineligible to contractthe with a state agencyagency. for 5 years following the date of the department’s determination of a violation.
(5)The Estate NFORCEMENT(b) .The person is ineligible to contract with a state agency may terminate the contract and may pursue all agency for 5 years following the date of the department’s appropriate legal remedies for the breach.
Thedetermination attorney general may bring an action in any court of competenta jurisdictionviolation. to enforce this section.
END(3) )E XEMPTION .
Subsection (2) does not prohibit a (5) E NFORCEMENT .
The attorney general may bring contract to which all of the following apply:
an action in any court of competent jurisdiction to en- (a) The goods or services offered under the contract force this section.
Show all 99 changed rows (59 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-3-2026
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2026
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dallman
-
Placed on calendar 1-22-2026 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
-
Introduced by Representatives Dallman, Behnke, Callahan, Dittrich, Green, Knodl, Kreibich, Kurtz, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Jacque, Marklein, Nass and Tomczyk
Sponsors
- Testin · Cosponsor
- Jacque · Cosponsor
- Marklein · Cosponsor
- Nass · Cosponsor
- Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- Alex Dallman · Primary
- Elijah Behnke · Cosponsor
- Calvin Callahan · Cosponsor
- Barbara Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Chanz Green · Cosponsor
- Daniel Knodl · Cosponsor
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Tony Kurtz · Cosponsor
- Clint Moses · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Cosponsor
- Jeffrey Mursau · Cosponsor
- Jerry O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Chuck Wichgers · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 18 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 42 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dallman, Alex Republican
Co-sponsors (18)
- Testin
- Jacque
- Marklein
- Nass
- Tomczyk
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Callahan, Calvin Republican
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Green, Chanz Republican
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Kurtz, Tony Republican
- Moses, Clint Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Piwowarczyk, Jim Republican
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
Not signed on (113)
113 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 113 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 52 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 42 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 44 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 44% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Nay |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 662 do?
- An Act to create 20.933 of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 662?
- AB 662 is sponsored by Testin, Jacque, Marklein, Nass, Tomczyk, Dallman, Alex (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Green, Chanz (Republican), Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Kurtz, Tony (Republican), Moses, Clint (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Piwowarczyk, Jim (Republican), and Wichgers, Chuck (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 662?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced November 19, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track AB 662?
- Track AB 662 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 662
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 662
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →