AB 502 — Relating to: outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances and that are affected by certain transportation-related projects; compensation for takings of signs, and appraisals upon which jurisdictional offers are based. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced October 09, 2025. It awaits signature.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on April 08, 2026.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
14 sponsors
1 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (10 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill revises handling of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs impacted by transportation projects.
AB 502 updates regulations for nonconforming outdoor advertising signs affected by transportation projects, allowing owners to reposition signs without losing nonconforming status. It also changes how compensation and appraisals are handled in cases of sign removal.
Summary
An Act to renumber and amend 32.05 (2) (b) and 84.30 (5r) (a); to amend 32.05 (3) (e), 84.30 (5r) (title), 84.30 (5r) (c), 84.30 (5r) (d) and 84.30 (8); to repeal and recreate 84.30 (5r) (b); to create 32.05 (2) (b) 2., 32.09 (6m), 84.30 (5r) (a) 1., 84.30 (5r) (a) 2., 84.30 (5r) (a) 3., 84.30 (5r) (a) 4., 84.30 (5r) (bs), 84.30 (5r) (cm), 84.30 (7) (c) and 84.30 (8m) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
159 added · 281 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes made in Assembly Bill 502 primarily focus on the regulations surrounding outdoor advertising signs that do not meet local laws, particularly when impacted by transportation projects. The bill introduces new guidelines for appraisals used to determine compensation for the removal or realignment of these signs, shifting away from the "unit rule," which previously influenced such decisions. This matters because it aims to ensure fairer compensation practices for sign owners whose businesses may be affected by changes to local infrastructure, helping them recover from potential losses more effectively.
-Date 2026of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 October 9, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives OEBEN , O'CONNOR , DOYLE, B.
JACOBSONAssembly ,Bill KREIBICH,502 MELOTIK,Date Mof URSAU,publication*: PENTERMAN , PIROS, MURPHY and BRILL, cosponsored by Senators EYEN , NASS and W ANGGAARD .
ReferredWISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to Committeerenumber onand Transportation.amend 32.05 (2) (b) and 84.30 (5r) (a);
A N A CT to renumber and amend 32.05 (2) (b) and 84.30 (5r) (a);
AnalysisThe bypeople the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill revises the standards governing the treatment of outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances (nonconforming signs) and that are affected by certain transportation-related public projects, prohibits the usestate of theWisconsin, “unitrepresented rule” in thesen- condemnationSECTION of2. signs, and limits the use of certain appraisals as the basis for a jurisdictional offer.
Under32.05 current(2) law,(b) if2. a highway project of the Department of Transportation causes the realignment of a nonconforming sign, the realignment does not affect the - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 sign’s nonconforming status under the ordinance.
“Realignment”of the statutes is definedcreated asate relocationand onassembly, thedo sameenact site.as follows:
Also under current law, if DOT proposes the realignment of a sign in connection with a highway project, DOT must notify the municipality or county that adopted the ordinance to whichread: the nonconforming sign does not conform of the sign’s proposed realignment.
TheSECTION municipality1. or county may then petition DOT to condemn the sign instead of realigning the sign, but must pay DOT for certain costs of condemnation if DOT succeeds in condemning the sign.
This32.05 bill(2) expands(b) the types of projects covered and replaces the realignmentstatutes provisionis withrenum- a32.05 repositioning(2) provision.(b) 2.
UnderAn thisappraisal bill,in if a state or local transportation project for which DOT has allocated state or federal funds (covered project) causes the removalamount or reduces the visibility of abered nonconforming32.05 sign,(2) the(b) sign’s1. nonconforming status under the ordinance is not affected if the sign is repositioned within the political subdivision in a manner approved by the political subdivision.
Repositioning under the bill means raising, lowering, rotating, or adjusting the sign or moving the sign to another location.
In general, the bill requires that the characteristics of a nonconforming sign be the same after repositioning as before repositioning.
If a sign is repositioned, the agency undertaking the covered project must pay to the sign owner the actual replacement costs incurred by the sign owner in repositioning the sign.
The bill requires that replacement costs be determined by using the moving cost agreement for the relocation of outdoor advertising signs.
Also under this bill, the agency that undertakes a covered project proposes the repositioning a nonconforming sign in connection with the project, that agency must notify the municipality or county that adopted the ordinance to which the sign does not conform of the sign’s proposed repositioning.
The municipality or county may then petition the agency to condemn the sign instead of repositioning, but must pay the agency for certain costs of condemnation if the agency succeeds in condemning the sign.
This bill also prohibits the use of the “unit rule” in the condemnation of signs.
In general, for properties owned by multiple parties, the “unit rule” limits the liability of a condemnor to the fair market value of the property taken, notwithstanding the potential loss in property value to the separate parties.
This bill provides that, for signs, a condemnor must pay values for 1) the value of the sign and any lease related to the sign, 2) the loss in value to other signs of the owner caused by the removal of the sign, and 3) with regard to the owner of the real property on which the sign is located, the loss of the right to erect and maintain the sign.
The bill specifically provides that these amounts are not limited to the fair market value of the property as an undivided whole.
This bill also prohibits a condemnor from using as an appraisal upon which a jurisdictional offer is based any appraisal in which the amount of the owner’s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner’s loss provided in the jurisdictional offer.
- 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 SECTION 1 For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
32.05 (2) (b) of the statutes is renumbered 32.05 (2) (b) 1.
the owner’s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner’s loss 32.05 (2) (b) 1.
(intro.) The condemnor shall providepro- provided in the jurisdictional offer is not an appraisal vide the owner with a all of the following:
A full narrative appraisal upon which the jurisdic- upon which the jurisdictional offer is based within the tional offer is based and a.
meaning of subd.
1.
a.
(a) andSECTION at3. the same time shall inform the owner of his or her.
32.05 (3) (e) of the statutes is amended and at the same time shall inform the owner of his or to read:
32.05 (3) (e) Stating that the appraisal or one of the her.
A notification of the right to obtain an appraisal appraisals of the property on which condemnor’s offer under this paragraph subd.
is based is available for inspection at a specified place 3.
The owner may obtain an appraisal by a qualified appraiserby ofpersons allhaving propertyan proposedinterest toin bethe acquired,lands andsought mayto submitbe theappraiser reasonable costs of theall appraisalproperty proposed to thebe condemnoracquired, forand payment.acquired.
TheAn ownerappraisal shallin which the amount of the may submit athe fullreasonable narrativecosts of the appraisal to the condemnorowner’s withinappraised 60loss daysis afterless thethan owner85 receivespercent theor condemnor’smore appraisal.condemnor for payment.
IfThe owner shall submit a full than 115 percent of the owneramount doesof notthe acceptowner’s aloss negotiatedpro- narrative appraisal to the condemnor within 60 days af- vided in the jurisdictional offer underis sub.not an appraisal upon ter the owner receives the condemnor’s appraisal.
Show all 226 changed lines (186 more)
(2a)If orthe which the jurisdictional offer is based within the mean- owner does not accept a negotiated offer under sub.
(3),(2a) theing ownerof may use an appraisal prepared under this paragraphparagraph. in any subsequent appeal.
Sor ECTIONthe 2.jurisdictional offer under sub.
32.05(3), (2)the (b)owner 2.may SECTION 4.
32.09 (6m) of the statutes is created to use an appraisal prepared under this paragraph in any read:
32.05subsequent (2)appeal. (b) 2.
An appraisal in which the amount of the owner’s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner’s - 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 SECTION 2 loss provided in the jurisdictional offer is not an appraisal upon which the jurisdictional offer is based within the meaning of subd.
1.
a.
S ECTION 3.
32.05 (3) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
32.05 (3) (e) Stating that the appraisal or one of the appraisals of the property on which condemnor’s offer is based is available for inspection at a specified place by persons having an interest in the lands sought to be acquired.
An appraisal in which the amount of the owner’s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner’s loss provided in the jurisdictional offer is not an appraisal upon which the jurisdictional offer is based within the meaning of this paragraph.
S ECTION 4.
32.09 (6m) of the statutes is created to read:
84.30ernor's (2)partial (j),veto allwhich ofdoes not expressly prescribe the followingtime apply,when regardlessit oftakes whethereffect shall take effect on the signday isafter consideredits adate legallyof permittedpublication.” signWisconsin orAct a- nonconforming2 sign- under2025 s.Assembly Bill 502 84.30 (2) (j), all of the following apply, regardless of 84.30 (5r) (a) 1.
“Covered project” means a high- whether the sign is considered a legally permitted sign way project undertaken by the department or a political or a nonconforming sign under s.
subdivision for which the department has allocated state (a) For a sign owned by someone other than the owneror offederal thefunds. fee property, the compensation paid by the condemnor is not limited to the compensation for the undivided value of the property as a whole.
(b)owner The owners of the propertyfee interestproperty, takenthe shallcompensation be paid allby of the following:SECTION 8.
1.84.30 (5r) (a) 2.
The value of the signstatutes andis anycre- leasecondemnor relatedis not limited to the sign.compensation for the ated to read:
2.undivided value of the property as a whole.
Loss84.30 in(5r) value(a) to2. other signs of the owner caused by the removal of the sign.
3.“Lead agency” means the depart- (b) The owners of the property interest taken shall ment, for a highway project undertaken by the depart- be paid all of the following:
Withment, regardor to the ownerpolitical ofsubdivision, thefor reala propertyhighway onproject which1. the sign is located, the loss of the right to erect and maintain the sign.
The value of the sign and any lease related to the undertaken by a political subdivision.
sign.
SECTION 9.
84.30 (5r) (a) 3.
of the statutes is cre- 2.
Loss in value to other signs of the owner caused ated to read:
by the removal of the sign.
84.30 (5r) (a) 3.
“Political subdivision” means a 3.
With regard to the owner of the real property on city, village, town, or county.
which the sign is located, the loss of the right to erect SECTION 10.
84.30 (5r) (a) 4.
of the statutes is cre- and maintain the sign.
ated to read:
(b) shall be paid84.30 to(5r) the(a) person4. entitled thereto.
The“Reposition” justmeans compensationto payableraise, underlower, par.paid to the person entitled thereto.
The just compensa- rotate, or adjust or to move to another location.
tion payable under par.
shall be paid -di- 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 SECTION 411. directly to the owner of such removed sign and the just compensation payable under par.
84.30 (5r) (b) of the statutes is re- rectly to the owner of such removed sign and the just pealed and recreated to read:
compensation payable under par.
shall be paid directlydi- 84.30 (5r) (b) If a sign does not conform to an ordi- rectly to the owner of the real property on which the sign nance of a political subdivision and a covered project is located.
If the condemnor and the owner reach agreementagree- causes the removal of the sign or reduces the visibility ment on the amount of compensation payable to such of the sign, the sign’s nonconforming status under the owner in respect to any removal or relocation, the condemnorcon- ordinance is not affected if the sign is repositioned in the demnor may pay such compensation to the owner and political subdivision in any manner approved by the po- thereby require or terminate the owner’s rights or interestsinter- bylitical purchase.subdivision.
Ifests theby condemnorpurchase. and the owner do not reach agreement as to such amount of compensation, the condemnor or owner may institute an action to have such compensation determined under s.
If the condemnor and the owner do SECTION 12.
84.30 (5r) (bs) of the statutes is cre- not reach agreement as to such amount of compensation, ated to read:
the condemnor or owner may institute an action to have 84.30 (5r) (bs) All of the following apply to a sign such compensation determined under s.
(d)that Ifis therepositioned condemnor and the owner do not reach agreement as to such amount of compensation, the condemnor and one or more owners may institute an action to have such compensation determined under s.this subsection:
(d) If the condemnor and the owner do not reach 1.
The size of the sign face and the number of sign agreement as to such amount of compensation, the con- faces on the sign after repositioning shall be the same as demnor and one or more owners may institute an action on the sign before repositioning.
to have such compensation determined under s.
Notwithstanding2. the language included in s.
32.05, separate appeals may be filed and maintained under that section in relation to the compensation payable under par.
(b).
A successful owner litigant under this subsection shall be entitled to recover litigation expenses provided that the owner satisfies the requirements of s.
32.28 (3).
S ECTION 5.
84.30 (5r) (title) of the statutes is amended to read:
84.30 (5r) (titlIGNS NONCONFORMING UNDER LOCAL ORDINANCES THAT ARE REALIGNED BECAUSE OF STATE AFFECTED BY CERTAIN HIGHWAY PROJECT.
S ECTION 6.
84.30 (5r) (a) of the statutes is renumbered 84.30 (5r) (a) (intro.) and amended to read:
84.30 (5r) (a) (intro.) In this subsection, “realignment” means relocation on the same site.:
S ECTION 7.
84.30 (5r) (a) 1.
of the statutes is created to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 6 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 SECTION 7 84.30 (5r) (a) 1.
“Covered project” means a highway project undertaken by the department or a political subdivision for which the department has allocated state or federal funds.
S ECTION 8.
84.30 (5r) (a) 2.
of the statutes is created to read:
84.30 (5r) (a) 2.
“Lead agency” means the department, for a highway project undertaken by the department, or the political subdivision, for a highway project undertaken by a political subdivision.
S ECTION 9.
84.30 (5r) (a) 3.
of the statutes is created to read:
84.30 (5r) (a) 3.
“Political subdivision” means a city, village, town, or county.
S ECTION 10.
84.30 (5r) (a) 4.
of the statutes is created to read:
84.30 (5r) (a) 4.
“Reposition” means to raise, lower, rotate, or adjust or to move to another location.
S ECTION 11.
84.30 (5r) (b) of the statutes is repealed and recreated to read:
84.30 (5r) (b) If a sign does not conform to an ordinance of a political subdivision and a covered project causes the removal of the sign or reduces the visibility of the sign, the sign’s nonconforming status under the ordinance is not affected if the sign is repositioned in the political subdivision in any manner approved by the political subdivision.
S ECTION 12.
84.30 (5r) (bs) of the statutes is created to read:
84.30 (5r) (bs) All of the following apply to a sign that is repositioned under this subsection:
1.
The size of the sign face and the number of sign faces on the sign after repositioning shall be the same as on the sign before repositioning.
- 2026 Legislature - 7 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 S ECTION 12 2.
The height of the sign after repositioning may beNotwithstanding different than the heightlanguage ofincluded thein signs. before repositioning, but only to the extent necessary to provide substantially the same view of the sign from the roadway from which motorists are intended to view the sign as it existed before the covered project.
32.05, sep- be different than the height of the sign before reposition- arate appeals may be filed and maintained under that ing, but only to the extent necessary to provide substan- section in relation to the compensation payable under tially the same view of the sign from the roadway from par.
(b).
A successful owner litigant under this subsec- which motorists are intended to view the sign as it ex- tion shall be entitled to recover litigation expenses pro- isted before the covered project.
vided that the owner satisfies the requirements of s.
If the height of a sign is increased due to a coveredcov- project32.28 and(3). the impact of the covered project on the sign terminates upon the completion of the covered project, a political subdivision may require a sign owner to reduce the height of a sign to its original height after the covered project is completed.
ered project and the impact of the covered project on the SECTION 5.
84.30 (5r) (title) of the statutes is sign terminates upon the completion of the covered amended to read:
project, a political subdivision may require a sign owner 84.30 (5r) (title) S IGNS NONCONFORMING UNDER to reduce the height of a sign to its original height after LOCAL ORDINANCES THAT ARE REALIGNED BECAUSE OF the covered project is completed.
STATE AFFECTED BY CERTAIN HIGHWAY PROJECTS .
This section does not prohibit a political subdivisionsubdivi- fromSECTION requiring6. that a repositioned sign comply with an ordinance that establishes a maximum height of the sign.
84.30 (5r) (a) of the statutes is renum- sion from requiring that a repositioned sign comply with bered 84.30 (5r) (a) (intro.) and amended to read:
an ordinance that establishes a maximum height of the 84.30 (5r) (a) (intro.) In this subsection, “realign- sign.
ment” means relocation on the same site.:
and 2., the characteristicscharac- ofSECTION the7. sign after repositioning shall be the same as the characteristics of the sign before repositioning.
4.84.30 (5r) (a) 1.
Noof signthe maystatutes beis repositionedcre- suchteristics thatof the sign doesafter notrepositioning conformshall tobe thisthe section.same ated to read:
Sas ECTIONthe 13.characteristics of the sign before repositioning.
Assembly Bill 502 - 3 - 2025 Wisconsin Act 4.
No sign may be repositioned such that the sign rather than by paying the value of each owner’s partial does not conform to this section.
interest.
Under the unit rule, the condemnor determines the fair market value as if only one person owned the SECTION 13.
84.30property. (5r) (c) If in connection with a highway covered project of the department the department the lead agency proposes the realignment repositioning of a sign that does not conform to a local ordinance and the sign owner elects to reposition the sign, the department lead agency shall notify the governing body of the municipality or county political subdivision where the sign is located and which adopted that enacted the ordinance of the sign’s proposed realignment - 2026 Legislature - 8 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 S ECTION 13 repositioning.
UponOnce receivingthat thisvalue notice,is determined, the governingcondemnor body84.30 may(5r) petition(c) theIf departmentin leadconnection agencywith toa acquirehighway thecov- signmakes anda anysingle realpayment propertythat interestis then apportioned among ered project of the signdepartment owner.the department the lead multiple owners.
If the department lead agency succeeds in condemning the sign, the governing body that made the petition to the department lead agency shall pay to the department lead agency an amount equal to the condemnation award, less relocation costs for the sign that would have been paid by the department lead agency if the sign had been realigned repositioned rather than condemned.
Notwithstanding s.
86.30 (2) (a) 1.
and (b) 1., 1g., and 1r., if the governing body fails to pay this amount and the amount is owed to the department, the department may reduce the municipality’s or county’s political subdivision’s general transportation aid payment under s.
86.30 by an equal amount.
This paragraph does not apply if the lead agency is the political subdivision that enacted the ordinance to which the sign does not conform.
S ECTION 14.
84.30 (5r) (cm) of the statutes is created to read:
84.30 (5r) (cm) If a sign is repositioned under this subsection, the lead agency shall pay to the sign owner the actual replacement costs incurred by the sign owner in repositioning the sign except that no payment may be made under this paragraph for a sign that is condemned.
Replacement costs under this paragraph shall be determined using the moving cost agreement for the relocation of outdoor advertising signs.
S ECTION 15.
84.30 (5r) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
84.30 (5r) (d) This subsection does not permit the alteration or movement of apply to a sign that is nonconforming under this section.
- 2026 Legislature - 9 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 S ECTION 16 S ECTION 16.
84.30 (7) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
84.30 (7) (c) 1.
In this paragraph, “the unit rule” means a common law eminent domain principle providing that when the property condemned is held by multiple owners, the condemnor provides compensation by paying the value of an undivided interest in the property rather than by paying the value of each owner’s partial interest.
Under the unit rule, the condemnor determines the fair market value as if only one person owned the property.
Once that value is determined, the condemnor makes a single payment that is then apportioned among multiple owners.
The unit rule may not be used by appraisers determiningdeter- agency proposes the realignment repositioning of a sign that does not conform to a local ordinance and the sign mining the appropriate compensation payable under this owner elects to reposition the sign, the department lead subsection and sub.
agency shall notify the governing body of the munici- S ECTION 17.
84.30 (8) of the statutes is amended to pality or county political subdivision where the sign is read:
84.30 (8) A GREED PRICE.PRICE .
Compensation required underlocated subs.and which adopted that enacted the ordinance of the sign’s proposed realignment repositioning.
(6)Upon andre- (7)under shallsubs. be paid to the person entitled thereto.
(6) and (7) shall be paid to the person enti- ceiving this notice, the governing body may petition the tled thereto.
department lead agency to acquire the sign and any real (7) (a) shall be paid directly to the owner of such removedre- moved sign and the just compensation payable under sub.property interest of the sign owner.
(7)If (b)the shalldepartment belead paidagency directlysucceeds toin thecondemning owner of the realsign, property on which the signgov- issub. located.
If(7) the(b) departmentshall andbe thepaid ownerdirectly reachto agreement on the amountowner of compensationthe payablereal toerning suchbody ownerthat inmade respect to any removal or relocation, the departmentpetition may pay such compensation to the ownerdepartment andproperty therebyon requirewhich or terminate the owner’ssign rightsis orlocated. interests by purchase.
If the department andlead agency shall pay to the ownerdepartment dolead notagency an and the owner reach agreement ason the amount of com- pensation payable to such owner in respect to any re- amount ofequal compensation,to the departmentcondemnation award, less reloca- moval or ownerrelocation, the department may institutepay ansuch actioncom- totion costs for the sign that would have suchbeen compensationpaid determinedby underthe s.department lead agency if the sign had been realigned pensation to the owner and thereby require or terminate repositioned rather than condemned.
Notwithstanding the owner’s rights or interests by purchase.
If the de- partment and the owner do not reach agreement as to s.
86.30 (2) (a) 1.
and (b) 1., 1g., and 1r., if the governing such amount of compensation, the department or owner body fails to pay this amount and the amount is owed to may institute an action to have such compensation deter- the department, the department may reduce the munici- pality’s or county’s political subdivision’s general trans- mined under s.
Sportation ECTIONaid 18.payment under s.
86.30 by an equal S ECTION 18.
-amount. 2026 Legislature - 10 - LRB-4857/1 EVM:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 502 SECTION 18 84.30 (8m) RIGHT TO APPEAL.
IfThis theparagraph departmentdoes and the owner do not reachapply agreementif as to such amount of compensation, the departmentlead or84.30 one(8m) orR moreIGHT ownersTO mayAPPEAL institute. an action to have such compensation determined under s.
If the department agency is the political subdivision that enacted the ordi- nance to which the sign does not conform.
and the owner do not reach agreement as to such amount SECTION 14.
84.30 (5r) (cm) of the statutes is cre- of compensation, the department or one or more owners may institute an action to have such compensation deter- ated to read:
mined under s.
Notwithstanding the language includedin- 84.30 (5r) (cm) If a sign is repositioned under this cluded in s.
32.05, separate appeals may be filed and subsection, the lead agency shall pay to the sign owner the actual replacement costs incurred by the sign owner maintained under that section in relation to the compensationcompen- sation payable under sub.
A successful in repositioning the sign except that no payment may be litigant under this subsection shall be entitled to recover litigationmade expensesunder providedthis thatparagraph thefor ownera satisfiessign thethat requirementsis ofcondemned. s.
litigation expenses provided that the owner satisfies the Replacement costs under this paragraph shall be deter- requirements of s.
SECTIONmined using the moving cost agreement for the reloca- S ECTION 19.
tion of outdoor advertising signs.
84.30 (5r) (title), (b), (bs), (c),SECTION (cm),15. and (d), the renumbering and amendment of s.
84.30 (5r) (d) of the statutes is (c), (cm), and (d), the renumbering and amendment of s.
amended to read:
84.30 (5r) (a) 1., 2., 84.30 (5r) (d) This subsection does not permit the 3., and 4.
first apply to signs in existence on the effective alteration or movement of apply to a sign that is noncon- date of this subsection.
forming under this section.
32.05 (3) (e), 32.09 (6m), 84.30SECTION (7)16. (c), (8), and (8m), the renumbering of s.
84.30 (7) (c) of the statutes is created and 84.30 (7) (c), (8), and (8m), the renumbering of s.
to read:
first apply84.30 to(7) condemnation(c) proceedings1. commenced on the effective date of this subsection.
SECTIONIn 20.this paragraph, “the unit rule” apply to condemnation proceedings commenced on the means a common law eminent domain principle provid- effective date of this subsection.
ing that when the property condemned is held by multi- S ECTION 20.
This act takes effect ple owners, the condemnor provides compensation by on the day after publication except as follows:
paying the value of an undivided interest in the property (1) The treatment of s.
84.30 (5r) (title), (b), (bs), Wisconsin Act - 4 - 2025 Assembly Bill 502 (c), (cm), and (d), the renumbering and amendment of the first day of the 4th month beginning after 84.30 (5r) (a), and the creation of s.
84.30 (5r) (a) 1., 2.,2.publication. 3., and 4.
ECTION3., 19and (1)4. of this act take effect on the first day of the 4th month beginning after publication.
(END)and SECTION 19 (1) of this act take effect on
Show all 226 changed rows (186 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2026
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2026
-
LRB correction
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Local Government
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 4, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
-
Introduced by Representatives Goeben, O'Connor, Doyle, B. Jacobson, Kreibich, Melotik, Mursau, Penterman, Spiros, Murphy and Brill; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Nass and Wanggaard
Sponsors
- Feyen · Cosponsor
- Nass · Cosponsor
- Wanggaard · Cosponsor
- Joy Goeben · Primary
- Jerry O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Steve Doyle · Cosponsor
- Brent Jacobson · Cosponsor
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Paul Melotik · Cosponsor
- Jeffrey Mursau · Cosponsor
- William Penterman · Cosponsor
- John Spiros · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Cosponsor
- Lindee Brill · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Goeben, Joy Republican
Co-sponsors (13)
- Feyen
- Nass
- Wanggaard
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Doyle, Steve Democrat
- Jacobson, Brent Republican
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Melotik, Paul Republican
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Penterman, William Republican
- Spiros, John Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Brill, Lindee Republican
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 502 do?
- An Act to renumber and amend 32.05 (2) (b) and 84.30 (5r) (a); to amend 32.05 (3) (e), 84.30 (5r) (title), 84.30 (5r) (c), 84.30 (5r) (d) and 84.30 (8); to repeal and recreate 84.30 (5r) (b); to create 32.05 (2) (b) 2., 32.09 (6m), 84.30 (5r) (a) 1., 84.30 (5r) (a) 2., 84.30 (5r) (a) 3., 84.30 (5r) (a) 4., 84.30 (5r) (bs), 84.30 (5r) (cm), 84.30 (7) (c) and 84.30 (8m) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 502?
- AB 502 is sponsored by Feyen, Nass, Wanggaard, Goeben, Joy (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Doyle, Steve (Democrat), Jacobson, Brent (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Melotik, Paul (Republican), Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Spiros, John (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), and Brill, Lindee (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 502?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced October 09, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track AB 502?
- Track AB 502 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 502
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 502
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →