Relating to: verification of a pupil’s family income for participation in a parental choice program.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 496 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 496.
You're tracking AB 496
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 496 — Relating to: verification of a pupil’s family income for participation in a parental choice program.
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced October 09, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to repeal 118.60 (2) (a) 1. c. and d. and 119.23 (2) (a) 1. d.; to amend 118.60 (2) (a) 1. a., 118.60 (2) (bm) and 119.23 (2) (a) 1. a. of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill changes the eligibility criteria for participation in parental choice programs by requiring annual verification of family income and removing provisions allowing continuation if income exceeds the threshold.
-
118.60 (2) (a) 1. c.
A pupil attending a private school under this section whose family income increases may continue to attend a private school under this section.This change eliminates the ability for pupils to continue in the program if their family income increases beyond the allowable limit.
-
118.60 (2) (a) 1. d.
The family income of the pupil shall be verified as provided in subd. 1. b.→ The family income of the pupil shall be verified as provided in subd. 1. b. A pupil attending a private school under this section whose family income increases may continue to attend a private school under this section.This removes the requirement for verification to be waived for returning pupils and mandates annual verification of income.
-
118.60 (2) (bm)
A pupil attending a private school under this section whose family income increases may continue to attend a private school under this section.→ A pupil attending a private school under this section whose family income increases may continue to attend a private school under this section.This reaffirms the income verification requirement without the previous continuance option based on income increases.
-
119.23 (2) (a) 1. d.
The family income of the pupil shall be verified as provided in subd. 1. b.This change similarly removes the provision allowing income verification to be waived for students returning to the program.
-
119.23 (2) (a) 1. a.
A pupil attending a private school under this section whose family income increases, including a pupil who attended a private school under this section in the 2010-11 school year and whose family income has increased, may continue to attend a private school under this section.→ A pupil attending a private school under this section whose family income increases may continue to attend a private school under this section.This modifies the existing language to remove reference to previous years while still stating that a pupil can't remain enrolled if their income exceeds the maximum threshold.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Representative Subeck added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
-
Introduced by Representatives Phelps, Sheehan, Hong, Arney, Bare, Clancy, Cruz, Fitzgerald, Joers, Madison, Palmeri, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Spaude, Stroud, Tenorio and Johnson; cosponsored by Senators Larson, Carpenter, Dassler-Alfheim, Keyeski, Pfaff, Ratcliff, Roys and Spreitzer
Sponsors
- Larson · Cosponsor
- Carpenter · Cosponsor
- Dassler-Alfheim · Cosponsor
- Keyeski · Cosponsor
- Pfaff · Cosponsor
- Ratcliff · Cosponsor
- Roys · Cosponsor
- Spreitzer · Cosponsor
- Christian Phelps · Primary
- Joe Sheehan · Cosponsor
- Francesca Hong · Cosponsor
- Margaret Arney · Cosponsor
- Mike Bare · Cosponsor
- Ryan Clancy · Cosponsor
- Angelina Cruz · Cosponsor
- Joan Fitzgerald · Cosponsor
- Alex Joers · Cosponsor
- Darrin Madison · Cosponsor
- Lori Palmeri · Cosponsor
- Christine Sinicki · Cosponsor
- Lee Snodgrass · Cosponsor
- Ryan Spaude · Cosponsor
- Angela Stroud · Cosponsor
- Angelito Tenorio · Cosponsor
- Tara Johnson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 24 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Phelps, Christian Democrat
Co-sponsors (24)
- Larson
- Carpenter
- Dassler-Alfheim
- Keyeski
- Pfaff
- Ratcliff
- Roys
- Spreitzer
- Sheehan, Joe Democrat
- Hong, Francesca Democrat
- Arney, Margaret Democrat
- Bare, Mike Democrat
- Clancy, Ryan Democrat
- Cruz, Angelina Democrat
- Fitzgerald, Joan Democrat
- Joers, Alex Democrat
- Madison, Darrin Democrat
- Palmeri, Lori Democrat
- Sinicki, Christine Democrat
- Snodgrass, Lee Democrat
- Spaude, Ryan Democrat
- Stroud, Angela Democrat
- Tenorio, Angelito Democrat
- Johnson, Tara Democrat
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 496 do?
- An Act to repeal 118.60 (2) (a) 1. c. and d. and 119.23 (2) (a) 1. d.; to amend 118.60 (2) (a) 1. a., 118.60 (2) (bm) and 119.23 (2) (a) 1. a. of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 496?
- AB 496 is sponsored by Larson, Carpenter, Dassler-Alfheim, Keyeski, Pfaff, Ratcliff, Roys, Spreitzer, Phelps, Christian (Democrat), Sheehan, Joe (Democrat), Hong, Francesca (Democrat), Arney, Margaret (Democrat), Bare, Mike (Democrat), Clancy, Ryan (Democrat), Cruz, Angelina (Democrat), Fitzgerald, Joan (Democrat), Joers, Alex (Democrat), Madison, Darrin (Democrat), Palmeri, Lori (Democrat), Sinicki, Christine (Democrat), Snodgrass, Lee (Democrat), Spaude, Ryan (Democrat), Stroud, Angela (Democrat), Tenorio, Angelito (Democrat), and Johnson, Tara (Democrat).
- What is the current status of AB 496?
- This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced October 09, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track AB 496?
- Track AB 496 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 496
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 496
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →