AB 393 — Relating to: school bus operation by drivers over 70 and drivers with medical conditions.

- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0649/1LRB-2195/2 ZDW:wljZDW:klm ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 2, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 393 DecemberAugust 1,29, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentatORTWELLRepresentatives S ORTWELL , PENTERMAN , D ITTRICH, GOEBEN, G OODWIN, K NODL, KREIBICH, M ELOTIK, MURSAU and O'C ONNOR, cosponsored by Senator J AMES .

AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendTransportation. the bill as follows:

1.A N A CT to amend 343.16 (5) (b) and 343.20 (1) (c);

Pageto 2,create line343.12 1:(3m) and 343.20 (1) (cm) of the statutes;

deleterelating linesto: 1 to 9.

ENDschool )bus operation by drivers over 70 and drivers with medical conditions.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a person may not operate a school bus unless the Department of Transportation has issued a school bus or “S” endorsement to their operator’s license.

A person must meet several requirements to be issued an “S” endorsement, including meeting certain physical standards, and a person’s “S” endorsement can be canceled for medical reasons.

A person whose “S” endorsement has been canceled can apply to reinstate the endorsement.

The application is considered by a medical review board that makes a final recommendation to DOT.

Under administrative rules promulgated by DOT, a review board may recommend that an exception be granted by DOT if the review board determines the person’s medical condition does not impair their ability to safely operate a school bus.

This bill provides that a person whose “S” endorsement has been cancelled for medical reasons that would require a medical review board exception may reinstate the endorsement by providing DOT documentation prepared by a health care provider stating that the person is able to resume operating a school bus.

When DOT receives the documentation, DOT must reinstate the person’s “S” endorsement, which remains valid unless the medical review board determines the reinstatement is improper.

- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2195/2 ZDW:klm ASSEMBLY BILL 393 S ECTION 1 Under current law, review boards must consist of licensed physicians or optometrists, to be appointed by the secretary of transportation.

The bill provides that physician assistants and advanced practice nurses are also eligible to be appointed to review boards.

Under current law, DOT may, by rule, require any person who is issued an operator’s license that is valid for more than two years to demonstrate continuing qualifications to hold the license at two-year intervals.

The bill authorizes DOT, by rule, to require testing in intervals of not less than two years.

The bill also provides that DOT must require any person who is 70 years of age or older and holds an “S” endorsement to file a medical certification annually and demonstrate their continuing ability to hold a license at four-year intervals.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

S ECTION 1.

343.12 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:

343.12 (3m) (a) A person whose school bus endorsement is cancelled for medical reasons that would require a medical review board exception to allow the person to continue operating a school bus may reinstate their school bus endorsement by providing the department documentation prepared by a health care provider stating that the person is able to resume operating a school bus.

(b) Upon receipt of documentation under par.

(a), the department shall reinstate the person’s school bus endorsement, which shall remain valid unless the reviewing board under s.

343.16 (5) (b) determines the reinstatement is improper.

S ECTION 2.

343.16 (5) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

343.16 (5) (b) Whenever the department receives the results of a special examination required under this subsection, the department shall give fair consideration to the recommendation of the examining person or agency together with other evidence in determining if it is in the interest of public safety to issue, renew, deny or cancel a license.

If a license is denied or canceled by the department after a special examination as provided in par.

(a), such denial or cancellation shall - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2195/2 ZDW:klm ASSEMBLY BILL 393 SECTION 2 be reviewed by a reviewing board upon written request of the applicant filed with the department within 10 days after receipt of notice of such denial or cancellation.

Notice of denial or cancellation shall be in writing and contain specific reasons.

The notice shall contain a statement that the applicant has 10 days within which to file a written request with the department for review of the department’s decision by the reviewing board.

The applicant shall have the right to appear personally before the review board, to present witnesses and additional information, and to be represented by counsel.

The department’s representative may administer oaths, issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of relevant documents and may require a reexamination of the applicant.

No law enforcement officer or other witness produced by the applicant to testify on the applicant’s behalf shall be paid a witness fee nor shall any law enforcement officer called to appear for the department be paid any witness fee.

A record including the recommendations of the board shall be made of the proceeding.

If a license is denied or canceled, the applicant shall be given specific reasons in writing.

Review boards shall consist of the department’s representative and at least 2 members appointed by the secretary from a list of physicians licensed to practice medicine in this state and a list of optometrists licensed to practice optometry physicians, physician assistants, advanced practice nurses, and optometrists licensed to practice in this state.

Optometrists shall be limited to reviewing cases concerning vision only.

In cases concerning mental disability or disease at least one of the physicians shall have specialized training in psychiatry.In cases concerning seizure disorders at least one of the physicians shall have specialized training in neurology.