AB 375 — Relating to: modifications to the historic rehabilitation tax credit. (FE)
Last action — Published 4-9-2026
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced July 17, 2025. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
14 sponsors
1 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 4 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to repeal 71.07 (9m) (a) 1m., 71.28 (6) (a) 1m. and 71.47 (6) (a) 1m.; to amend 71.07 (9m) (a) 2m., 71.07 (9m) (a) 3., 71.07 (9m) (c) (intro.), 71.07 (9m) (c) 1., 71.07 (9m) (cm), 71.07 (9m) (cn) (intro.), 71.07 (9m) (g) 1., 71.07 (9m) (h), 71.28 (6) (a) 2m., 71.28 (6) (a) 3., 71.28 (6) (c) (intro.), 71.28 (6) (c) 1., 71.28 (6) (cm), 71.28 (6) (cn) (intro.), 71.28 (6) (g) 1., 71.28 (6) (h), 71.47 (6) (a) 2m., 71.47 (6) (a) 3., 71.47 (6) (c) (intro.), 71.47 (6) (c) 1., 71.47 (6) (cm), 71.47 (6) (cn) (intro.), 71.47 (6) (g) 1., 71.47 (6) (h) and 238.17 (2); to create 71.07 (9m) (a) 4., 71.07 (9m) (ck), 71.28 (6) (a) 4., 71.28 (6) (ck), 71.47 (6) (a) 4. and 71.47 (6) (ck) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
294 added · 299 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Assembly Bill 375 change the way taxpayers can claim the historic rehabilitation tax credit. Originally, the bill allowed the full credit to be claimed in one year instead of spreading it out over five years, which is how federal law required it. However, the latest changes revert to a system that permits credits for all projects on the same parcel over a longer period of 15 years. This adjustment is important because it provides more flexibility and potentially broader financial support for those undertaking historic rehabilitation projects in the state.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBs0152/1LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTEBILL AMENDMENT375 1,July TO17, ASSEMBLY2025 BILL- 375Introduced Novemberby 5,Representatives 2025RMSTRONG -, OfferedK REIBIC, JOERS , M OSES , MURSAU, ORTIZ-VELEZ, TITTL, RANEL and U DELL, cosponsored by RepresentatRMSTRONGSenators .F EYEN, D ASSLER-ALFHEIM, H ABUSH SINYKIN, L.
JOHNSON and S PREITZER.
Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.
to create 71.07 (9m) (a) 4., 71.07 (9m) (ck), 71.28 (6) (a) 4., 71.28 (6) (ck), 71.47 (6) (a) 4.
and 71.47 (6) (a)(ck) 4.of the statutes;
of the statutes;
In - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 1 general, a taxpayer may claim both credits for the same rehabilitation project;
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 SECTION 1 however, in some cases, a taxpayer may not be able to claim both due to differences in state and federal law.
Federal law further requires the expenditures exceed the greater of the taxpayer[staxpayer’s adjusted basis in the property (initial cost with certain adjustments) or $5,000.
The bill modifies the timing for claiming the credit, which is currently based on when the taxpayer claims the federal credit.
Federal law, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, generally requires taxpayers claim the credit in equal amounts over five years.
Under the bill, the full credit is generally claimed in one year.
The federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 had sunsetted a similar federal credit.
Under the bill, this restriction only applies to certifying persons to claim tax credits for all projects undertaken on the same parcel within a single 15-year10-year period.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
71.02, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 SECTION 2 of the costs of qualified rehabilitation expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for certified historic structures on property located in this state, if the cost of the person[sperson’s qualified rehabilitation expenditures is at least - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc SECTION 2 $50,000 and the rehabilitated property is placed in service after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026.
71.02, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the costs of qualified rehabilitation expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for qualified rehabilitated buildings, as defined in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, on property located in this state, if the cost of the person[sperson’s qualified rehabilitation expenditures is at least $50,000 and the rehabilitated property is placed in service after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026, and regardless of whether the rehabilitated property is used for multiple or revenue-producing purposes.
a.
71.02, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the qualified rehabilitation expenditures- 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 SECTION 4 expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for a qualified rehabilitated building located in this state and placed in service after December 31, 2025.
b.For purposes of this subdivision, “qualified rehabilitated building” has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated under section 47 (c) (1) (B) (i) of the Internal Revenue Code only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer (at the time and in the manner prescribed by federal regulations) and ending with or within the taxable year are at least $50,000.
For purposes of this subdivision, Xqualified rehabilitated buildingY has the - 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc SECTION 4 meaning given in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated under section 47 (c) (1) (B) (i) of the Internal Revenue Code only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer, at the time and in the manner prescribed by federal regulations, and ending with or within the taxable year are at least $50,000.
c.
For purposes of this subdivision, Xqualified rehabilitation expenditureY has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that if the claimant does not claim the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation to which the claim under this subdivision relates, the rehabilitation shall be treated as a certified rehabilitation under section 47 (c) (2) (B) (iv) of the Internal Revenue Code if the state historic preservation officer certifies the rehabilitation as being consistent with the historic character of the property or the district in which the property is located.
unless the claimant includes with the claimant[sclaimant’s return a copy of the claimant[sclaimant’s certification under s.
Evidence If the claimant claims the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation, evidence that the rehabilitation was recommended by the state historic preservation officer for - 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc SECTION 6 approval by the secretary of the interior under 36 CFR 67.6 before the physical work of construction, or destruction in preparation for construction, began and that the rehabilitation was approved by the state historic preservation offIf the claimant does not claim the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation, evidence that the rehabilitation was approved by the - 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 SECTION 6 state historic preservation officer before the physical work of construction, or destruction in preparation for construction, began.
71.07 (9m) (cm)(ck) of the statutes is amendedcreated to read:
71.07 (9m) (cm)(ck) AnyA credit claimed under thispar. subsection for Wisconsin purposes shall be claimed at the same time as for federal purposes, regardless of whether the claimant claims the credit for federal purposes.
(a) 4.
shall be claimed in the taxable year in which the qualified rehabilitated building is placed in service, unless the taxpayer makes the election under par.
(g) 1.
to claim the credit based on progress expenditures under section 47 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code.
71.07 (9m) (cm) of the statutes is amended to read:
71.07 (9m) (cm) Any credit claimed under this subsection for Wisconsin purposes par.
(a) 2m.
or 3.
shall be claimed at the same time as for federal purposes.
S ECTION 9.
S ECTION 9.10.
S ECTION 10.11.
71.07 (9m) (h) Any person, including a nonprofit entity described in section - 2026 Legislature - 6 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 10 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, may sell or otherwise transfer the credit - 2026 Legislature - 6 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 11 under par.
Show all 119 changed lines (79 more)
S ECTION 11.12.
S ECTION 12.13.
71.23, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the costs of qualified rehabilitation expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for certified historic structures on property located in this state, if the cost of the person[sperson’s qualified rehabilitation expenditures is at least $50,000 and the rehabilitated property is placed in service after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026.
S ECTION 13.14.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026, any person may claim as a credit against taxes otherwise - 2026 Legislature - 7 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 13 due under s.
71.23, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent - 2026 Legislature - 7 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 14 of the costs of qualified rehabilitation expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for qualified rehabilitated buildings, as defined in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, on property located in this state, if the cost of the person[sperson’s qualified rehabilitation expenditures is at least $50,000 and the rehabilitated property is placed in service after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026, and regardless of whether the rehabilitated property is used for multiple or revenue-producing purposes.
S ECTION 14.15.
a.
71.23, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the qualified rehabilitation expendituresexpenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for a qualified rehabilitated building located in this state and placed in service after December 31, 2025.
b.For purposes of this subdivision, “qualified rehabilitated building” has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated under section 47 (c) (1) (B) (i) of the Internal Revenue Code only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer (at the time and in the manner prescribed by federal regulations) and ending with or within the taxable year are at least $50,000.
For purposes of this subdivision, Xqualified rehabilitated buildingY has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated under section 47 (c) (1) (B) (i) of the Internal Revenue Code only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer, at the time and - 2026 Legislature - 8 - LRBs0152/1LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc SASSEMBLY ECTIONBILL 14375 inS theECTION manner16 prescribedS byECTION federal16. regulations, and ending with or within the taxable year are at least $50,000.
c.
For purposes of this subdivision, Xqualified rehabilitation expenditureY has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that if the claimant does not claim the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation to which the claim under this subdivision relates, the rehabilitation shall be treated as a certified rehabilitation under section 47 (c) (2) (B) (iv) of the Internal Revenue Code if the state historic preservation officer certifies the rehabilitation as being consistent with the historic character of the property or the district in which the property is located.
S ECTION 15.
unless the claimant includes with the claimant[sclaimant’s return a copy of the claimant[sclaimant’s certification under s.
S ECTION 16.17.
Evidence If the claimant claims the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation, evidence that the rehabilitation was recommended by the state historic preservation officer for approval by the secretary of the interior under 36 CFR 67.6 before the physical work of construction, or destruction in preparation for construction, began and that the rehabilitation was approved by the state historic preservation offIf the claimant does not claim the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code - 2026 Legislature - 9 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 16 for the same rehabilitation, evidence that the rehabilitation was approved by the state historic preservation officer before the physical work of construction, or destruction in preparation for construction, began.
S ECTION 17.
71.28 (6) (cm) of the statutes is amended to read:
71.28 (6) (cm) Any credit claimed under this subsection for Wisconsin purposes shall be claimed at the same time as for federal purposes, regardless of whether the claimant claims the credit for federal purposes.
71.28 (6) (ck) of the statutes is created to read:
71.28 (6) (ck) A credit claimed under par.
(a) 4.
shall be claimed in the taxable year in which the qualified rehabilitated building is placed in service, unless the taxpayer makes the election under par.
(g) 1.
to claim the credit based on progress expenditures under section 47 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code.
S ECTION 19.
71.28 (6) (cm) of the statutes is amended to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 9 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 19 71.28 (6) (cm) Any credit claimed under this subsection for Wisconsin purposes par.
(a) 2m.
or 3.
shall be claimed at the same time as for federal purposes.
S ECTION 20.
S ECTION 19.21.
S ECTION 20.22.
71.02, 71.23, or 71.43, if the person notifies the department of the transfer, and submits with the notification a copy of the transfer documents, - 2026 Legislature - 10 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 20 and the department certifies ownership of the credit with each transThe.
The transferee may first use the credit to offset tax in the taxable year of the transferor in which the transfer occurs, and may use the - 2026 Legislature - 10 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 22 credit only to offset tax in taxable years otherwise allowed to be claimed and carried forward by the original claimant.
S ECTION 21.23.
S ECTION 22.24.
71.43, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the costs of qualified rehabilitation expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for certified historic structures on property located in this state, if the cost of the person[sperson’s qualified rehabilitation expenditures is at least $50,000 and the rehabilitated property is placed in service after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026.
S ECTION 23.25.
71.43, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the costs of qualified rehabilitation expenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for qualified rehabilitated buildings, as defined in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, on property located in this state, if - 2026 Legislature - 11 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 23 the cost of the person[sperson’s qualified rehabilitation expenditures is at least $50,000 and the rehabilitated property is placed in service after December 31, 2013, and before January 1, 2026, and regardless of whether the rehabilitated property is used for multiple or revenue-providing purposes.
No credit may be claimed under this subdivision for property listed as a contributing building in the state register of - 2026 Legislature - 11 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 25 historic places or in the national register of historic places and no credit may be claimed under this subdivision for nonhistoric, nonresidential property converted into housing if the property has been previously used for housing.
S ECTION 24.26.
a.
71.43, up to the amount of those taxes, an amount equal to 20 percent of the qualified rehabilitation expendituresexpenditures, as defined in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, for a qualified rehabilitated building located in this state and placed in service after December 31, 2025.
b.For purposes of this subdivision, “qualified rehabilitated building” has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated under section 47 (c) (1) (B) (i) of the Internal Revenue Code only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer (at the time and in the manner prescribed by federal regulations) and ending with or within the taxable year are at least $50,000.
ForS purposesECTION of27. this subdivision, Xqualified rehabilitated buildingY has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated under section 47 (c) (1) (B) (i) of the Internal Revenue Code only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer, at the time and in the manner prescribed by federal regulations, and ending with or within the taxable year are at least $50,000.
c.
For purposes of this subdivision, Xqualified rehabilitation expenditureY has the meaning given in section 47 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, except that if the claimant does not claim the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue - 2026 Legislature - 12 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 24 Code for the same rehabilitation to which the claim under this subdivision relates, the rehabilitation shall be treated as a certified rehabilitation under section 47 (c) (2) (B) (iv) of the Internal Revenue Code if the state historic preservation officer certifies the rehabilitation as being consistent with the historic character of the property or the district in which the property is located.
S ECTION 25.
unless the claimant includes with the claimant[sclaimant’s return a copy of the claimant[sclaimant’s certification under s.
S ECTION 26.28.
Evidence If the claimant claims the credit under section 47 of - 2026 Legislature - 12 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 28 the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation, evidence that the rehabilitation was recommended by the state historic preservation officer for approval by the secretary of the interior under 36 CFR 67.6 before the physical work of construction, or destruction in preparation for construction, began and that the rehabilitation was approved by the state historic preservation offIf the claimant does not claim the credit under section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code for the same rehabilitation, evidence that the rehabilitation was approved by the state historic preservation officer before the physical work of construction, or destruction in preparation for construction, began.
S ECTION 27.29.
71.47 (6) (ck) of the statutes is created to read:
71.47 (6) (ck) A credit claimed under par.
(a) 4.
shall be claimed in the taxable year in which the qualified rehabilitated building is placed in service, unless the taxpayer makes the election under par.
(g) 1.
to claim the credit based on progress expenditures under section 47 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code.
S ECTION 30.
71.47 (6) (cm) Any credit claimed under this subsection for Wisconsin - 2026 Legislature - 13 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 27 purposes shallpar. be claimed at the same time as for federal purposes, regardless of whether the claimant claims the credit for federal purposes.
S(a) ECTION2m. 28.
or 3.
shall be claimed at the same time as for federal purposes.
S ECTION 31.
S ECTION 29.32.
(a) 2m.,2m, 3., or 4.
elects to claim the credit based on claiming amounts for - 2026 Legislature - 13 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 32 expenditures as the expenditures are paid, rather than when the rehabilitation work is completed progress expenditures under section 47 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code, the person shall file an election form with the department, in the manner prescribed by the department.
S ECTION 30.33.
The transferee may first use the credit to offset tax in the taxable year of the transferor in which the transfer occurs, and may use the - 2026 Legislature - 14 - LRBs0152/1 EKL&MDE:cdc S ECTION 30 credit only to offset tax in taxable years otherwise allowed to be claimed and carried forward by the original claimant.
S ECTION 31.34.
238.17 (2) Beginning July 1, 2018, the corporation may not certify persons to claim more than a total of $3,500,000 in tax credits within a single 15-year10-year period for all projects undertaken on the same parcel.
S ECTION 32.35.
do not affect the ability of a claimant who claims a - 2026 Legislature - 14 - LRB-2879/1 EKL&MDE:cdc ASSEMBLY BILL 375 S ECTION 35 credit under s.
(2)END Credits) awarded during a single 15-year period under s.
238.17 (2), as amended by this act, include any amount in tax credits certified between July 1, 2018, and the effective date of this act.
(END)
Show all 119 changed rows (79 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Substitute Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 4-9-2026
-
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 238
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
-
Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2026
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 31, Noes 2
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 97, Noes 0
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Armstrong
-
Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor
-
Representative Anderson added as a coauthor
-
Representative Stubbs added as a coauthor
-
Representatives Palmeri and Miresse added as coauthors
-
Withdrawn from Committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 10-7-2025
-
Senator Larson added as a cosponsor
-
Representative McCarville added as a coauthor
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Representative Snodgrass added as a coauthor
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Armstrong
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
-
Introduced by Representatives Armstrong, Kreibich, Joers, Moses, Mursau, Ortiz-Velez, Tittl, Tranel and Udell; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, L. Johnson and Spreitzer
Sponsors
- Feyen · Cosponsor
- Dassler-Alfheim · Cosponsor
- Habush Sinykin · Cosponsor
- Spreitzer · Cosponsor
- David Armstrong · Primary
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Alex Joers · Cosponsor
- Clint Moses · Cosponsor
- Jeffrey Mursau · Cosponsor
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Cosponsor
- Paul Tittl · Cosponsor
- Travis Tranel · Cosponsor
- Randy Udell · Cosponsor
- Tara Johnson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Armstrong, David Republican
Co-sponsors (13)
- Feyen
- Dassler-Alfheim
- Habush Sinykin
- Spreitzer
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Joers, Alex Democrat
- Moses, Clint Republican
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat
- Tittl, Paul Republican
- Tranel, Travis Republican
- Udell, Randy Democrat
- Johnson, Tara Democrat
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| DASSLER-ALFHEI | — | Yea |
| HABUSH SINYKIN | — | Yea |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Yea |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Yea |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Yea |
| Keyeski, Sarah | Democrat | Yea |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Yea |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Yea |
| Ratcliff, Melissa | Democrat | Yea |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Yea |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Yea |
| Wall, Jamie | Democrat | Yea |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Yea |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Cabral-Guevara, Rachael | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Nay |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Nay |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Tomczyk, Cory | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 41 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 97 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Yea |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Yea |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Yea |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Yea |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Yea |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Yea |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Yea |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Yea |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Yea |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Yea |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Yea |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Yea |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Yea |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Yea |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Yea |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Yea |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Yea |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Yea |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Yea |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Yea |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Yea |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Yea |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Yea |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Yea |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Yea |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Yea |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Yea |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Yea |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Yea |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Yea |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Yea |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Yea |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Yea |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Yea |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Yea |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Yea |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Yea |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 375 do?
- An Act to repeal 71.07 (9m) (a) 1m., 71.28 (6) (a) 1m. and 71.47 (6) (a) 1m.; to amend 71.07 (9m) (a) 2m., 71.07 (9m) (a) 3., 71.07 (9m) (c) (intro.), 71.07 (9m) (c) 1., 71.07 (9m) (cm), 71.07 (9m) (cn) (intro.), 71.07 (9m) (g) 1., 71.07 (9m) (h), 71.28 (6) (a) 2m., 71.28 (6) (a) 3., 71.28 (6) (c) (intro.), 71.28 (6) (c) 1., 71.28 (6) (cm), 71.28 (6) (cn) (intro.), 71.28 (6) (g) 1., 71.28 (6) (h), 71.47 (6) (a) 2m., 71.47 (6) (a) 3., 71.47 (6) (c) (intro.), 71.47 (6) (c) 1., 71.47 (6) (cm), 71.47 (6) (cn) (intro.), 71.47 (6) (g) 1., 71.47 (6) (h) and 238.17 (2); to create 71.07 (9m) (a) 4., 71.07 (9m) (ck), 71.28 (6) (a) 4., 71.28 (6) (ck), 71.47 (6) (a) 4. and 71.47 (6) (ck) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 375?
- AB 375 is sponsored by Feyen, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, Spreitzer, Armstrong, David (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Joers, Alex (Democrat), Moses, Clint (Republican), Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia (Democrat), Tittl, Paul (Republican), Tranel, Travis (Republican), Udell, Randy (Democrat), and Johnson, Tara (Democrat).
- What is the current status of AB 375?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced July 17, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track AB 375?
- Track AB 375 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 375
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 375
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →