AB 91 — Relating to: the requirement that first class cities and first class city school districts place school resource officers in schools. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced February 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Assembly
Current position in the legislative process.
-
16 sponsors
1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (13 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to renumber and amend 62.90 (8); to amend 79.02 (2) (b) and 79.02 (3); to create 62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e), 79.02 (4) and 115.437 (2) (b) 3. of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
197 added · 9 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Assembly Bill 91 changes the requirement for the number of school resource officers (SROs) in first class city school districts, specifically Milwaukee Public Schools. Instead of requiring 25 SROs, the bill now mandates that there must be at least 50 SROs present in schools. This change significantly increases the number of officers in schools, which proponents argue will enhance student safety and community policing efforts.
CORRECTED COPY - 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0056/1LRB-2256/1 FFK:skwFFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 91 MarchFebruary 6,28, 2025 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentatONOVANRepresentatives D ONOVAN , BEHNKE , BRILL, DITTRICH, GUNDRUM , KURTZ , MAXEY , MURPHY , NOVAK, O'CONNOR , TUSLER , W ITTKE and K AUFERT , cosponsored by Senators W ANGGAARD , FEYEN and TOMCZYK .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendCriminal theJustice billand asPublic follows:Safety.
A N A CT to renumber and amend 62.90 (8);
to amend 79.02 (2) (b) and 79.02 (3);
to create 62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e), 79.02 (4) and 115.437 (2) (b) 3.
of the statutes;
relating to:
the requirement that first class cities and first class city school districts place school resource officers in schools.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Current law requires, beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of a first class city school district (currently only Milwaukee Public Schools) to ensure that at least 25 school resource officers are present at schools within the school district (SRO requirement).
Under current law, a “school resource officer” is a law enforcement officer who is deployed in community-oriented policing and assigned by the law enforcement agency that employs him or her to work in a full-time capacity in collaboration with a school district.
Current law also requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to agree on how to apportion the costs of meeting the SRO requirement between the two entities.
On October 8, 2024, a complaint was filed in Milwaukee County that alleged MPS is failing to comply with the SRO requirement and asked for a writ of mandamus to require compliance.
On January 23, 2025, a Milwaukee County judge ordered MPS to comply with the SRO requirement on or before February 17, 2025.
On February 17, 2025, the same Milwaukee County judge gave MPS an additional days to comply with the January 23, 2025 order.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 1 This bill requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to apportion 75 percent of the costs of complying with the SRO requirement to MPS and 25 percent to the City of Milwaukee.
The bill further requires that by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law 1) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement and 2) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must jointly certify to the Joint Committee on Finance that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.
Under the bill, a similar certification process is required if the initial agreement between MPS and the City of Milwaukee is terminated.
First, MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement within 30 days of the termination of the agreement.
Second, by no later than 30 days after entering into the agreement, the City of Milwaukee must certify to JCF that at least 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools.
Lastly, by no later than 30 days after the certification is made to JCF, MPS must certify to JCF that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.
The bill also creates financial consequences for both the City of Milwaukee and MPS if these requirements are not met.
Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Administration to withhold 10 percent of the supplemental county and municipal aid to the City of Milwaukee if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the city and MPS or if the City of Milwaukee fails to certify to JCF, by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools and, if a new agreement is entered into in the future, that 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools.
Similarly, the bill requires the Department of Public Instruction to withhold 20 percent of the per pupil categorical aid payment owed to MPS if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the City of Milwaukee and MPS or if MPS fails to certify to JCF by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law and, if required in the future due to a new agreement, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
62.90 (8) of the statutes is renumbered 62.90 (8) (b) and amended to read:
62.90 (8) (b) Beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of the 1st class city school district that is located in the 1st class city shall ensure that not fewer than 25 school resource officers are present at schools within the school district during - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 1 normal school hours and that school resource officers are available during before- school and after-school care, extracurricular activities, and sporting events as needed.
In addition, beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of the 1st class city school district that is located in the 1st class city shall ensure that the school resource officers complete the 40-hour course sponsored by the National Association of School Resource Officers.
Beginning in the 2025-26 school year, the school board of the 1st class city school district that is located in the 1st class city shall consider the statistics it receives under s.
118.124 (3) (a) when deciding at which schools to place school resource officers required under this subsection.
The 1st class city school district and the 1st class city shall agree to an apportionment of apportion 75 percent of the costs of meeting the requirements of this subsection to the 1st class city school district and 25 percent of the costs of meeting the requirements of this subsection to the 1st class city.
(a) In this subsection, “law:
Page“Law 3,enforcement lineofficer” 10:means a person who is employed by the state or a political subdivision of the state for the purpose of detecting and preventing crime and enforcing laws or ordinances and who is authorized to make arrests for violations of the laws or ordinances that the person is employed to enforce, and “school.
delete X75Y and substitute X50Y.
Page“School 3,resource lineofficer” 12:means a law enforcement officer who is deployed in community-oriented policing and assigned by the law enforcement agency, as defined in s.
delete165.83 X25Y(1) and(b), substitutethat X50Y.employs him or her to work in a full-time capacity in collaboration with a school district.
ENDS )ECTION 2.
62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e) of the statutes are created to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 2 62.90 (8) (c) The 1st class city and the school board of the 1st class city school district shall enter into an agreement to implement the requirements under par.
Show all 129 changed lines (89 more)
(b), and if an agreement under this paragraph terminates, the 1st class city and the school board of the 1st class city school district shall enter into an agreement under this paragraph no later than 30 days after the termination.
(d) By no later than 30 days after an agreement is reached under par.
(c), the 1st class city shall certify to the joint committee on finance that at least 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed by the school board of the 1st class city school district in schools within the 1st class city school district.
(e) By no later than 30 days after the certification is made under par.
(d), the school board of the 1st class city school district shall certify to the joint committee on finance that at least 25 school resource officers are present in schools within the school district.
S ECTION 3.
79.02 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
79.02 (2) (b) Subject to sub.
(4) and ss.
59.605 (4) and 70.995 (14) (b), payments in July shall equal 15 percent of the municipality’s or county’s estimated payments under ss.
79.035, 79.036, 79.037, 79.038, 79.039, and 79.04 and 100 percent of the municipality’s estimated payments under s.
79.05.
Upon certification by the department of revenue, the estimated payment under s.
79.05 may be distributed before the 4th Monday in July.
S ECTION 4.
79.02 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
79.02 (3) Subject to sub.
(4) and s.
59.605 (4), payments to each municipality and county in November shall equal that municipality’s or county’s entitlement under ss.
79.035, 79.036, 79.037, 79.038, 79.039, 79.04, and 79.05 for the current - 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 4 year, minus the amount distributed to the municipality or county under sub.
(2) (b) and minus any amount withheld under sub.
(4).
S ECTION 5.
79.02 (4) of the statutes is created to read:
79.02 (4) (a) For the distribution in 2025 and subsequent years, if a municipality that is subject to the requirement under s.
62.90 (8) (c) does not provide evidence to the department of administration that it has entered into an agreement with the school board of a 1st class city school district by the deadline provided in s.
62.90 (8) (c), the department of administration shall withhold 10 percent of the municipality’s total of payments under s.
79.037 until the municipality provides evidence to the department of administration that it is in compliance with s.
62.90 (8) (c).
(b) For the distribution in 2025 and subsequent years, if a municipality has entered into an agreement required under s.
62.90 (8) (c) and does not provide certification to the joint committee on finance under s.
62.90 (8) (d) by the deadline provided in that paragraph, the department of administration shall withhold 10 percent of the municipality’s total of payments under s.
79.037 until the municipality makes the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (d).
S ECTION 6.
115.437 (2) (b) 3.
of the statutes is created to read:
115.437 (2) (b) 3.
Annually, on the 4th Monday of March, the department shall withhold aid under par.
(a) from a 1st class city school district as follows:
a.
If the school board of the 1st class city school district does not provide evidence to the department that it has entered into an agreement with the 1st class city as required under s.
62.90 (8) (c), the department shall withhold aid in an amount equal to 20 percent of the amount calculated under par.
(a) until the school - 2026 Legislature - 6 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 6 board of the 1st class city school district provides evidence to the department that is in compliance with s.
62.90 (8) (c).
b.
If a certification is made under s.
62.90 (8) (d) and the school board of the 1st class city school district has not made the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (e) by the deadline provided in that paragraph, the department shall withhold aid in an amount equal to 20 percent of the amount calculated under par.
(a) until the school board of the 1st class city school district makes the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (e).
S ECTION 7.
Nonstatutory provisions.
(1) NITIAL AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATIONS.
(a) Deadline.
Notwithstanding s.
62.90 (8) (d) and (e), by no later than 30 days after the effective date of this subsection, a 1st class city and the school board of the 1st class city school district shall do all of the following:
1.
Enter into an agreement to implement the requirements under s.
62.90 (8) (b).
2.
Jointly certify to the joint committee on finance that at least 25 school resource officers, as defined in s.
62.90 (8) (a) 2., are present in schools within the 1st class city school district.
(b) School district consequences.
For purposes of withholding per pupil aid under s.
115.437 (2) (b) 3.
in the school year beginning after the effective date of this paragraph, a failure by the school board of a 1st class city to comply with par.
(a) 1.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to provide evidence to the department that it has entered into an agreement with the 1st class city as required under s.
62.90 (8) (c) and a failure by the school board of a 1st class city to - 2026 Legislature - 7 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 7 comply with par.
(a) 2.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to make the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (e) by the deadline provided in s.
62.90 (8) (e).
(c) First class city.
For purposes of withholding supplemental county and municipal aid under s.
79.02 (4) for the distribution for 2025, a failure by a 1st class city to comply with par.
(a) 1.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to provide evidence to the department of administration that it has entered into an agreement with the 1st class city school district as required under s.
62.90 (8) (c) and a failure by a 1st class city to comply with par.
(a) 2.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to make the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (d) by the deadline provided in s.
62.90 (8) (d).
(END)
Show all 129 changed rows (89 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor
-
Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 44
-
Decision of the Chair appealed
-
Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sinicki
-
Read a second time
-
Referred to calendar of 3-13-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Donovan
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Representatives Donovan, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kurtz, Maxey, Murphy, Novak, O'Connor, Tusler, Wittke and Kaufert; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Feyen and Tomczyk
Sponsors
- Wanggaard · Cosponsor
- Feyen · Cosponsor
- Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- Bob Donovan · Primary
- Elijah Behnke · Cosponsor
- Lindee Brill · Cosponsor
- Barbara Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Rick Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Tony Kurtz · Cosponsor
- Dave Maxey · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Cosponsor
- Todd Novak · Cosponsor
- Jerry O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Ron Tusler · Cosponsor
- Robert Wittke · Cosponsor
- Dean Kaufert · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on · 41 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Donovan, Bob Republican
Co-sponsors (15)
- Wanggaard
- Feyen
- Tomczyk
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Brill, Lindee Republican
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Gundrum, Rick Republican
- Kurtz, Tony Republican
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Novak, Todd Republican
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Tusler, Ron Republican
- Wittke, Robert Republican
- Kaufert, Dean Republican
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 52 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 41 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 53 | 44 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 44% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Nay |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Not Voting |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 91 do?
- An Act to renumber and amend 62.90 (8); to amend 79.02 (2) (b) and 79.02 (3); to create 62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e), 79.02 (4) and 115.437 (2) (b) 3. of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 91?
- AB 91 is sponsored by Wanggaard, Feyen, Tomczyk, Donovan, Bob (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Brill, Lindee (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Kurtz, Tony (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Novak, Todd (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Tusler, Ron (Republican), Wittke, Robert (Republican), and Kaufert, Dean (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 91?
- This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced February 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track AB 91?
- Track AB 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 91
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 91
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →