Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly 13 R cosponsors

AB 91 — Relating to: the requirement that first class cities and first class city school districts place school resource officers in schools. (FE)

Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced February 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Assembly

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (13 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

An Act to renumber and amend 62.90 (8); to amend 79.02 (2) (b) and 79.02 (3); to create 62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e), 79.02 (4) and 115.437 (2) (b) 3. of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

197 added · 9 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Assembly Bill 91 changes the requirement for the number of school resource officers (SROs) in first class city school districts, specifically Milwaukee Public Schools. Instead of requiring 25 SROs, the bill now mandates that there must be at least 50 SROs present in schools. This change significantly increases the number of officers in schools, which proponents argue will enhance student safety and community policing efforts.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0056/1 FFK:skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 91 March 6, 2025 - Offered by RepresentatONOVAN .
CORRECTED COPY - 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 February 28, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives D ONOVAN , BEHNKE , BRILL, DITTRICH, GUNDRUM , KURTZ , MAXEY , MURPHY , NOVAK, O'CONNOR , TUSLER , W ITTKE and K AUFERT , cosponsored by Senators W ANGGAARD , FEYEN and TOMCZYK .
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.
A N A CT to renumber and amend 62.90 (8);
to amend 79.02 (2) (b) and 79.02 (3);
to create 62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e), 79.02 (4) and 115.437 (2) (b) 3.
of the statutes;
relating to:
the requirement that first class cities and first class city school districts place school resource officers in schools.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Current law requires, beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of a first class city school district (currently only Milwaukee Public Schools) to ensure that at least 25 school resource officers are present at schools within the school district (SRO requirement).
Under current law, a “school resource officer” is a law enforcement officer who is deployed in community-oriented policing and assigned by the law enforcement agency that employs him or her to work in a full-time capacity in collaboration with a school district.
Current law also requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to agree on how to apportion the costs of meeting the SRO requirement between the two entities.
On October 8, 2024, a complaint was filed in Milwaukee County that alleged MPS is failing to comply with the SRO requirement and asked for a writ of mandamus to require compliance.
On January 23, 2025, a Milwaukee County judge ordered MPS to comply with the SRO requirement on or before February 17, 2025.
On February 17, 2025, the same Milwaukee County judge gave MPS an additional days to comply with the January 23, 2025 order.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 1 This bill requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to apportion 75 percent of the costs of complying with the SRO requirement to MPS and 25 percent to the City of Milwaukee.
The bill further requires that by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law 1) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement and 2) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must jointly certify to the Joint Committee on Finance that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.
Under the bill, a similar certification process is required if the initial agreement between MPS and the City of Milwaukee is terminated.
First, MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement within 30 days of the termination of the agreement.
Second, by no later than 30 days after entering into the agreement, the City of Milwaukee must certify to JCF that at least 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools.
Lastly, by no later than 30 days after the certification is made to JCF, MPS must certify to JCF that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.
The bill also creates financial consequences for both the City of Milwaukee and MPS if these requirements are not met.
Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Administration to withhold 10 percent of the supplemental county and municipal aid to the City of Milwaukee if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the city and MPS or if the City of Milwaukee fails to certify to JCF, by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools and, if a new agreement is entered into in the future, that 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools.
Similarly, the bill requires the Department of Public Instruction to withhold 20 percent of the per pupil categorical aid payment owed to MPS if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the City of Milwaukee and MPS or if MPS fails to certify to JCF by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law and, if required in the future due to a new agreement, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
62.90 (8) of the statutes is renumbered 62.90 (8) (b) and amended to read:
62.90 (8) (b) Beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of the 1st class city school district that is located in the 1st class city shall ensure that not fewer than 25 school resource officers are present at schools within the school district during - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 1 normal school hours and that school resource officers are available during before- school and after-school care, extracurricular activities, and sporting events as needed.
In addition, beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of the 1st class city school district that is located in the 1st class city shall ensure that the school resource officers complete the 40-hour course sponsored by the National Association of School Resource Officers.
Beginning in the 2025-26 school year, the school board of the 1st class city school district that is located in the 1st class city shall consider the statistics it receives under s.
118.124 (3) (a) when deciding at which schools to place school resource officers required under this subsection.
The 1st class city school district and the 1st class city shall agree to an apportionment of apportion 75 percent of the costs of meeting the requirements of this subsection to the 1st class city school district and 25 percent of the costs of meeting the requirements of this subsection to the 1st class city.
(a) In this subsection, “law:
Page 3, line 10:
“Law enforcement officer” means a person who is employed by the state or a political subdivision of the state for the purpose of detecting and preventing crime and enforcing laws or ordinances and who is authorized to make arrests for violations of the laws or ordinances that the person is employed to enforce, and “school.
delete X75Y and substitute X50Y.
Page 3, line 12:
“School resource officer” means a law enforcement officer who is deployed in community-oriented policing and assigned by the law enforcement agency, as defined in s.
delete X25Y and substitute X50Y.
165.83 (1) (b), that employs him or her to work in a full-time capacity in collaboration with a school district.
END )
S ECTION 2.
62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e) of the statutes are created to read:
- 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 2 62.90 (8) (c) The 1st class city and the school board of the 1st class city school district shall enter into an agreement to implement the requirements under par.
Show all 129 changed rows (89 more)
Previous
Latest
(b), and if an agreement under this paragraph terminates, the 1st class city and the school board of the 1st class city school district shall enter into an agreement under this paragraph no later than 30 days after the termination.
(d) By no later than 30 days after an agreement is reached under par.
(c), the 1st class city shall certify to the joint committee on finance that at least 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed by the school board of the 1st class city school district in schools within the 1st class city school district.
(e) By no later than 30 days after the certification is made under par.
(d), the school board of the 1st class city school district shall certify to the joint committee on finance that at least 25 school resource officers are present in schools within the school district.
S ECTION 3.
79.02 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
79.02 (2) (b) Subject to sub.
(4) and ss.
59.605 (4) and 70.995 (14) (b), payments in July shall equal 15 percent of the municipality’s or county’s estimated payments under ss.
79.035, 79.036, 79.037, 79.038, 79.039, and 79.04 and 100 percent of the municipality’s estimated payments under s.
79.05.
Upon certification by the department of revenue, the estimated payment under s.
79.05 may be distributed before the 4th Monday in July.
S ECTION 4.
79.02 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
79.02 (3) Subject to sub.
(4) and s.
59.605 (4), payments to each municipality and county in November shall equal that municipality’s or county’s entitlement under ss.
79.035, 79.036, 79.037, 79.038, 79.039, 79.04, and 79.05 for the current - 2026 Legislature - 5 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 4 year, minus the amount distributed to the municipality or county under sub.
(2) (b) and minus any amount withheld under sub.
(4).
S ECTION 5.
79.02 (4) of the statutes is created to read:
79.02 (4) (a) For the distribution in 2025 and subsequent years, if a municipality that is subject to the requirement under s.
62.90 (8) (c) does not provide evidence to the department of administration that it has entered into an agreement with the school board of a 1st class city school district by the deadline provided in s.
62.90 (8) (c), the department of administration shall withhold 10 percent of the municipality’s total of payments under s.
79.037 until the municipality provides evidence to the department of administration that it is in compliance with s.
62.90 (8) (c).
(b) For the distribution in 2025 and subsequent years, if a municipality has entered into an agreement required under s.
62.90 (8) (c) and does not provide certification to the joint committee on finance under s.
62.90 (8) (d) by the deadline provided in that paragraph, the department of administration shall withhold 10 percent of the municipality’s total of payments under s.
79.037 until the municipality makes the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (d).
S ECTION 6.
115.437 (2) (b) 3.
of the statutes is created to read:
115.437 (2) (b) 3.
Annually, on the 4th Monday of March, the department shall withhold aid under par.
(a) from a 1st class city school district as follows:
a.
If the school board of the 1st class city school district does not provide evidence to the department that it has entered into an agreement with the 1st class city as required under s.
62.90 (8) (c), the department shall withhold aid in an amount equal to 20 percent of the amount calculated under par.
(a) until the school - 2026 Legislature - 6 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 6 board of the 1st class city school district provides evidence to the department that is in compliance with s.
62.90 (8) (c).
b.
If a certification is made under s.
62.90 (8) (d) and the school board of the 1st class city school district has not made the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (e) by the deadline provided in that paragraph, the department shall withhold aid in an amount equal to 20 percent of the amount calculated under par.
(a) until the school board of the 1st class city school district makes the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (e).
S ECTION 7.
Nonstatutory provisions.
(1) NITIAL AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATIONS.
(a) Deadline.
Notwithstanding s.
62.90 (8) (d) and (e), by no later than 30 days after the effective date of this subsection, a 1st class city and the school board of the 1st class city school district shall do all of the following:
1.
Enter into an agreement to implement the requirements under s.
62.90 (8) (b).
2.
Jointly certify to the joint committee on finance that at least 25 school resource officers, as defined in s.
62.90 (8) (a) 2., are present in schools within the 1st class city school district.
(b) School district consequences.
For purposes of withholding per pupil aid under s.
115.437 (2) (b) 3.
in the school year beginning after the effective date of this paragraph, a failure by the school board of a 1st class city to comply with par.
(a) 1.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to provide evidence to the department that it has entered into an agreement with the 1st class city as required under s.
62.90 (8) (c) and a failure by the school board of a 1st class city to - 2026 Legislature - 7 - LRB-2256/1 FFK&KP:emw&skw ASSEMBLY BILL 91 SECTION 7 comply with par.
(a) 2.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to make the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (e) by the deadline provided in s.
62.90 (8) (e).
(c) First class city.
For purposes of withholding supplemental county and municipal aid under s.
79.02 (4) for the distribution for 2025, a failure by a 1st class city to comply with par.
(a) 1.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to provide evidence to the department of administration that it has entered into an agreement with the 1st class city school district as required under s.
62.90 (8) (c) and a failure by a 1st class city to comply with par.
(a) 2.
by the deadline provided in par.
(a) is considered a failure to make the certification required under s.
62.90 (8) (d) by the deadline provided in s.
62.90 (8) (d).
(END)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  3. Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  4. Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  5. Received from Assembly

  6. Ordered immediately messaged

  7. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  8. Rules suspended

  9. Ordered to a third reading

  10. Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  11. Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  12. Decision of the Chair appealed

  13. Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  14. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sinicki

  15. Read a second time

  16. Referred to calendar of 3-13-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)

  17. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  18. Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 2

  19. Executive action taken

  20. Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Donovan

  21. Fiscal estimate received

  22. Public hearing held

  23. Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  24. Introduced by Representatives Donovan, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kurtz, Maxey, Murphy, Novak, O'Connor, Tusler, Wittke and Kaufert; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Feyen and Tomczyk

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on · 41 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (15)

Not signed on (116)

116 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 116 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 53 Yea · 44 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 52001
Unaffiliated 1300
Democrat 04101
Total 534402
% of votes cast 54%44%0%2%
How each member voted (99)
Member Party Vote
ANDERSON — Nay
JOHNSON — Nay
MOORE OMOKUNDE — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Arney, Margaret Democrat Nay
Bare, Mike Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Brown, Brienne Democrat Nay
Clancy, Ryan Democrat Nay
Cruz, Angelina Democrat Nay
DeSanto, Karen Democrat Nay
DeSmidt, Ben Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Fitzgerald, Joan Democrat Nay
Goodwin, Russell Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
Hysell, Andrew Democrat Nay
Jacobson, Jenna Democrat Nay
Joers, Alex Democrat Nay
Kirsch, Karen Democrat Nay
Madison, Darrin Democrat Nay
Mayadev, Renuka Democrat Nay
McCarville, Maureen Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Miresse, Vincent Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Not Voting
Palmeri, Lori Democrat Nay
Phelps, Christian Democrat Nay
Prado, Priscilla Democrat Nay
Rivera-Wagner, Amaad Democrat Nay
Roe, Ann Democrat Nay
Sheehan, Joe Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Spaude, Ryan Democrat Nay
Stroud, Angela Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Tenorio, Angelito Democrat Nay
Udell, Randy Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
Armstrong, David Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brill, Lindee Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Donovan, Bob Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Franklin, Benjamin Republican Yea
Goeben, Joy Republican Yea
Green, Chanz Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
Gustafson, Nate Republican Yea
Hurd, Karen Republican Yea
Jacobson, Brent Republican Yea
Kaufert, Dean Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Kreibich, Rob Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Maxey, Dave Republican Yea
Melotik, Paul Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Nedweski, Amanda Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
O'Connor, Jerry Republican Yea
Penterman, William Republican Not Voting
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Piwowarczyk, Jim Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tucker, Duke Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 91 do?
An Act to renumber and amend 62.90 (8); to amend 79.02 (2) (b) and 79.02 (3); to create 62.90 (8) (c), (d) and (e), 79.02 (4) and 115.437 (2) (b) 3. of the statutes;
Who sponsors AB 91?
AB 91 is sponsored by Wanggaard, Feyen, Tomczyk, Donovan, Bob (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Brill, Lindee (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Kurtz, Tony (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Novak, Todd (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), Tusler, Ron (Republican), Wittke, Robert (Republican), and Kaufert, Dean (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 91?
This bill has passed the Assembly. Introduced February 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track AB 91?
Track AB 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 91

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 91

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →