Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: To Executive 8 R cosponsors

AB 85 — Relating to: recommendation to revoke extended supervision, parole, or probation if a person is charged with a crime. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 28, 2025. It awaits signature.

Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on August 11, 2025.

Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • To Executive

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 15 sponsors

    1 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

51 added · 84 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Assembly Bill 85 specify that if someone on extended supervision, parole, or probation is charged with a new crime, the Department of Corrections is required to recommend revoking their release. Previously, the law allowed for various sanctions for violating conditions, but it did not mandate revocation solely based on new charges. This change is significant because it establishes a clear protocol for handling cases where individuals facing new legal issues may pose additional risks, thus potentially enhancing public safety.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 February 28, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives B.
Date of enactment:
ACOBSON , DONOVAN , D UCHOW , MAXEY, MURPHY, PENTERMAN , WICHGERS and KNODL , cosponsored by Senators H UTTON , BRADLEY , JACQUE, N ASS, TOMCZYK , JAMES and W ANGGAARD .
Assembly Bill 85 Date of publication*:
Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
A N A CT to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a person who is released on extended supervision, parole, or probation is subject to conditions or rules of the release.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in sen- 304.06 (3) Every paroled prisoner remains in the le- ate and assembly, do enact as follows:
If the person violates a condition or rule, the person is subject to sanctions for the violation, which may include revocation of release.
gal custody of the department unless otherwise provided by the department.
This bill requires the Department of Corrections to recommend revoking a person’s extended supervision, parole, or probation if the person is charged with a crime while on release.
If the department alleges that any SECTION 1.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
302.113 (8m) (a) of the statutes is condition or rule of parole has been violated by the pris- amended to read:
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
302.113 (8m) (a) Every person released to extended oner, the department may take physical custody of the supervision under this section remains in the legal cus- prisoner for the investigation of the alleged violation.
SECTION 1.
If tody of the department.
302.113 (8m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
If the department alleges that the department is satisfied that any condition or rule of any condition or rule of extended supervision has been parole has been violated, it shall afford the prisoner such administrative hearings as are required by law.
302.113 (8m) (a) Every person released to extended supervision under this - 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 SECTION 1 section remains in the legal custody of the department.
If the violated by the person, the department may take physi- cal custody of the person for the investigation of the al- prisoner is charged with a crime, the department shall leged violation.
If the department alleges that any condition or rule of extended supervision has been violated by the person, the department may take physical custody of the person for the investigation of the alleged violation.
If the person is charged with a crime, recommend that the prisoner[s parole be revoked.
If the person is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s extended supervision be revoked.
Un- the department shall recommend that the person[s ex- less waived by the parolee, the final administrative hear- tended supervision be revoked.
S ECTION 2.
ing shall be held before a hearing examiner from the di- SECTION 2.
302.114 (8m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
302.114 (8m) (a) of the statutes is vision of hearings and appeals in the department of ad- ministration who is licensed to practice law in this state.
302.114 (8m) (a) Every person released to extended supervision under this section remains in the legal custody of the department.
amended to read:
If the department alleges that any condition or rule of extended supervision has been violated by the person, the department may take physical custody of the person for the investigation of the alleged violation.
302.114 (8m) (a) Every person released to extended The hearing examiner shall enter an order revoking or supervision under this section remains in the legal cus- not revoking parole.
If the person is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s extended supervision be revoked.
Upon request by either party, the tody of the department.
S ECTION 3.
If the department alleges that administrator of the division of hearings and appeals any condition or rule of extended supervision has been shall review the order.
304.06 (3) of the statutes is amended to read:
The hearing examiner may order violated by the person, the department may take physi- that a deposition be taken by audiovisual means and al- cal custody of the person for the investigation of the al- low the use of a recorded deposition under s.
304.06 (3) Every paroled prisoner remains in the legal custody of the department unless otherwise provided by the department.If the department alleges that any condition or rule of parole has been violated by the prisoner, the department may take physical custody of the prisoner for the investigation of the alleged violation.
967.04 (7) leged violation.
If the department is satisfied that any condition or rule of parole has been violated, it shall afford the prisoner such administrative hearings as are required by law.
If the person is charged with a crime, to (10).
If the prisoner is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the prisoner’s parole be revoked.
If the parolee waives the final administrative the department shall recommend that the person[s ex- hearing, the secretary of corrections shall enter an order tended supervision be revoked.
Unless waived by the parolee, the final administrative hearing shall be held before a hearing examiner from the division of hearings and appeals in the department of administration who is - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 SECTION 3 licensed to practice law in this state.
revoking or not revoking parole.
The hearing examiner shall enter an order revoking or not revoking parole.
If the examiner, the ad- SECTION 3.
Upon request by either party, the administrator of the division of hearings and appeals shall review the order.
304.06 (3) of the statutes is amended to ministrator upon review, or the secretary in the case of a read:
The hearing examiner may order that a deposition be taken by audiovisual means and allow the use of a recorded deposition under s.
waiver finds that the prisoner has violated the rules or * Section 991.11, ISCONSINSTATUTES:
967.04 (7) to (10).
Effective date of acts.
If the parolee waives the final administrative hearing, the secretary of corrections shall enter an order revoking or not revoking parole.If the examiner, the administrator upon review, or the secretary in the case of a waiver finds that the prisoner has violated the rules or conditions of parole, the examiner, the administrator upon review, or the secretary in the case of a waiver, may order the prisoner returned to prison to continue serving his or her sentence, or to continue on parole.
XEvery act and every portion of an act enacted by the legislature over the gov- ernor's partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.Y Wisconsin Act - 2 - 2025 Assembly Bill 85 conditions of parole, the examiner, the administrator recommend that the person[s probation be revoked.
If the prisoner claims or appears to be indigent, the department shall refer the prisoner to the authority for indigency determinations specified under s.
Un- upon review, or the secretary in the case of a waiver, less waived by the probationer, a hearing examiner for may order the prisoner returned to prison to continue the division shall conduct an administrative hearing and serving his or her sentence, or to continue on parole.
If enter an order either revoking or not revoking probation.
the prisoner claims or appears to be indigent, the depart- Upon request of either party, the administrator of the di- ment shall refer the prisoner to the authority for indi- vision shall review the order.
If the probationer waives gency determinations specified under s.
S ECTION 4.
the final administrative hearing, the secretary of correc- SECTION 4.
973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes is tions shall enter an order either revoking or not revoking amended to read:
973.10 (2) (intro.) If a probationer violates the conditions of probation, the department of corrections may initiate a proceeding before the division of hearings and appeals in the department of administration.
probation.
If the probationer is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s probation be revoked.
Unless waived by the probationer, a hearing examiner for the division shall conduct an administrative hearing and enter an order either revoking or not revoking probation.
Upon request of either party, the administrator of the division shall review the order.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
If the probationer waives the final administrative hearing, - 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 S ECTION 4 the secretary of corrections shall enter an order either revoking or not revoking probation.
SECTION 5.
973.10 (2) (intro.) If a probationer violates the con- SECTION 5.
(1) The treatment of ss.
ditions of probation, the department of corrections may (1) The treatment of ss.
302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3), and 973.10 (2) (intro.) first applies to charges that are filed on the effective date of this subsection.
302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 initiate a proceeding before the division of hearings and (8m) (a), 304.06 (3), and 973.10 (2) (intro.) first applies appeals in the department of administration.
END )
If the pro- to charges that are filed on the effective date of this bationer is charged with a crime, the department shall subsection.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

  2. Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  3. Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025

  4. Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025

  5. Report correctly enrolled on 6-20-2025

  6. Received from Senate concurred in

  7. Ordered immediately messaged

  8. Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 14

  9. Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  10. Ordered to a third reading

  11. Read a second time

  12. Placed on calendar 6-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Available for scheduling

  14. Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  15. Executive action taken

  16. Public hearing held

  17. Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  18. Received from Assembly

  19. Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 43

  21. Rules suspended

  22. Ordered to a third reading

  23. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  24. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative McGuire

  25. Read a second time

  26. Fiscal estimate received

  27. Referred to calendar of 3-13-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)

  28. Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 3, Noes 1

  29. Executive action taken

  30. Public hearing held

  31. Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  32. Introduced by Representatives B. Jacobson, Donovan, Duchow, Maxey, Murphy, Penterman, Wichgers and Knodl; cosponsored by Senators Hutton, Bradley, Jacque, Nass, Tomczyk, James and Wanggaard

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 53 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (14)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 18 Yea · 14 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 18000
Democrat 01200
Unaffiliated 0201
Total 181401
% of votes cast 55%42%0%3%
How each member voted (33)
Member Party Vote
DASSLER-ALFHEI — Nay
HABUSH SINYKIN — Nay
JOHNSON — Not Voting
Carpenter, Tim Democrat Nay
Drake, Dora Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
Keyeski, Sarah Democrat Nay
Larson, Chris Democrat Nay
Pfaff, Brad Democrat Nay
Ratcliff, Melissa Democrat Nay
Roys, Kelda Democrat Nay
Smith, Jeff Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Wall, Jamie Democrat Nay
Wirch, Robert Democrat Nay
Bradley, Julian Republican Yea
Cabral-Guevara, Rachael Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Feyen, Dan Republican Yea
Hutton, Rob Republican Yea
Jacque, André Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kapenga, Chris Republican Yea
LeMahieu, Devin Republican Yea
Marklein, Howard Republican Yea
Nass, Steve Republican Yea
Quinn, Romaine Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Testin, Patrick Republican Yea
Tomczyk, Cory Republican Yea
Wanggaard, Van Republican Yea
Wimberger, Eric Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 53 Yea · 44 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 52001
Unaffiliated 1300
Democrat 04101
Total 534402
% of votes cast 54%44%0%2%
How each member voted (99)
Member Party Vote
ANDERSON — Nay
JOHNSON — Nay
MOORE OMOKUNDE — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
Andraca, Deb Democrat Nay
Arney, Margaret Democrat Nay
Bare, Mike Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Brown, Brienne Democrat Nay
Clancy, Ryan Democrat Nay
Cruz, Angelina Democrat Nay
DeSanto, Karen Democrat Nay
DeSmidt, Ben Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Fitzgerald, Joan Democrat Nay
Goodwin, Russell Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hong, Francesca Democrat Nay
Hysell, Andrew Democrat Nay
Jacobson, Jenna Democrat Nay
Joers, Alex Democrat Nay
Kirsch, Karen Democrat Nay
Madison, Darrin Democrat Nay
Mayadev, Renuka Democrat Nay
McCarville, Maureen Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Miresse, Vincent Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia Democrat Not Voting
Palmeri, Lori Democrat Nay
Phelps, Christian Democrat Nay
Prado, Priscilla Democrat Nay
Rivera-Wagner, Amaad Democrat Nay
Roe, Ann Democrat Nay
Sheehan, Joe Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Snodgrass, Lee Democrat Nay
Spaude, Ryan Democrat Nay
Stroud, Angela Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Tenorio, Angelito Democrat Nay
Udell, Randy Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
Armstrong, David Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Behnke, Elijah Republican Yea
Born, Mark Republican Yea
Brill, Lindee Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Callahan, Calvin Republican Yea
Dallman, Alex Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Donovan, Bob Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Franklin, Benjamin Republican Yea
Goeben, Joy Republican Yea
Green, Chanz Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
Gustafson, Nate Republican Yea
Hurd, Karen Republican Yea
Jacobson, Brent Republican Yea
Kaufert, Dean Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Kreibich, Rob Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Maxey, Dave Republican Yea
Melotik, Paul Republican Yea
Moses, Clint Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Nedweski, Amanda Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
O'Connor, Jerry Republican Yea
Penterman, William Republican Not Voting
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Piwowarczyk, Jim Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tucker, Duke Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 85 do?
An Act to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
Who sponsors AB 85?
AB 85 is sponsored by Hutton, Bradley, Jacque, Nass, Tomczyk, James, Wanggaard, Jacobson, Brent (Republican), Donovan, Bob (Republican), Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Wichgers, Chuck (Republican), and Knodl, Daniel (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 85?
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 28, 2025. It awaits signature.
Where can I track AB 85?
Track AB 85 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 85

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 85

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →