AB 85 — Relating to: recommendation to revoke extended supervision, parole, or probation if a person is charged with a crime. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 28, 2025. It awaits signature.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on August 11, 2025.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
15 sponsors
1 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
51 added · 84 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Assembly Bill 85 specify that if someone on extended supervision, parole, or probation is charged with a new crime, the Department of Corrections is required to recommend revoking their release. Previously, the law allowed for various sanctions for violating conditions, but it did not mandate revocation solely based on new charges. This change is significant because it establishes a clear protocol for handling cases where individuals facing new legal issues may pose additional risks, thus potentially enhancing public safety.
-Date 2026of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 February 28, 2025 - Introduced by Representatives B.
ACOBSONAssembly ,Bill DONOVAN85 ,Date Dof UCHOWpublication*: , MAXEY, MURPHY, PENTERMAN , WICHGERS and KNODL , cosponsored by Senators H UTTON , BRADLEY , JACQUE, N ASS, TOMCZYK , JAMES and W ANGGAARD .
ReferredWISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to Committeeamend on302.113 Judiciary.(8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
A N A CT to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
AnalysisThe bypeople of the Legislativestate Referenceof BureauWisconsin, Underrepresented currentin law,sen- a304.06 person(3) whoEvery isparoled releasedprisoner onremains extendedin supervision,the parole,le- orate probationand isassembly, subjectdo toenact conditionsas orfollows: rules of the release.
Ifgal thecustody personof violates a condition or rule, the persondepartment isunless subjectotherwise toprovided sanctionsby for the violation,department. which may include revocation of release.
ThisIf bill requires the Departmentdepartment ofalleges Correctionsthat toany recommendSECTION revoking1. a person’s extended supervision, parole, or probation if the person is charged with a crime while on release.
For302.113 further(8m) information(a) seeof the statestatutes andis localcondition fiscalor estimate,rule whichof willparole behas printedbeen asviolated anby appendixthe topris- thisamended bill.to read:
The302.113 people(8m) of(a) Every person released to extended oner, the statedepartment may take physical custody of Wisconsin,the representedsupervision under this section remains in senatethe andlegal assembly,cus- doprisoner enactfor asthe follows:investigation of the alleged violation.
SECTIONIf 1.tody of the department.
302.113If (8m)the (a)department ofalleges that the statutesdepartment is amendedsatisfied tothat read:any condition or rule of any condition or rule of extended supervision has been parole has been violated, it shall afford the prisoner such administrative hearings as are required by law.
302.113If (8m)the (a)violated Everyby personthe releasedperson, tothe extendeddepartment supervisionmay undertake thisphysi- -cal 2026custody Legislatureof -the 2person -for LRB-1596/1the CMH:emwinvestigation ASSEMBLYof BILLthe 85al- SECTIONprisoner 1is sectioncharged remainswith ina crime, the legaldepartment custodyshall ofleged theviolation. department.
If the departmentperson allegesis thatcharged anywith conditiona orcrime, rulerecommend ofthat extended supervision has been violated by the person,prisoner[s theparole departmentbe mayrevoked. take physical custody of the person for the investigation of the alleged violation.
IfUn- the persondepartment isshall chargedrecommend withthat athe crime,person[s theex- departmentless shallwaived recommendby thatthe parolee, the person’sfinal extendedadministrative hear- tended supervision be revoked.
Sing ECTIONshall be held before a hearing examiner from the di- SECTION 2.
302.114 (8m) (a) of the statutes is amendedvision of hearings and appeals in the department of ad- ministration who is licensed to read:practice law in this state.
302.114amended (8m) (a) Every person released to extendedread: supervision under this section remains in the legal custody of the department.
If302.114 the(8m) department(a) allegesEvery thatperson anyreleased conditionto or rule of extended supervisionThe hashearing beenexaminer violatedshall byenter thean person,order therevoking departmentor maysupervision takeunder physicalthis custodysection ofremains thein person for the investigationlegal ofcus- thenot allegedrevoking violation.parole.
IfUpon therequest personby iseither chargedparty, with a crime, the departmenttody shallof recommend that the person’sdepartment. extended supervision be revoked.
SIf ECTIONthe 3.department alleges that administrator of the division of hearings and appeals any condition or rule of extended supervision has been shall review the order.
304.06The (3)hearing examiner may order violated by the person, the department may take physi- that a deposition be taken by audiovisual means and al- cal custody of the statutesperson isfor amendedthe toinvestigation read:of the al- low the use of a recorded deposition under s.
304.06967.04 (3)(7) Everyleged paroled prisoner remains in the legal custody of the department unless otherwise provided by the department.If the department alleges that any condition or rule of parole has been violated by the prisoner, the department may take physical custody of the prisoner for the investigation of the alleged violation.
If the departmentperson is satisfiedcharged thatwith anya conditioncrime, orto rule(10). of parole has been violated, it shall afford the prisoner such administrative hearings as are required by law.
If the prisonerparolee iswaives chargedthe withfinal aadministrative crime, the department shall recommend that the prisoner’sperson[s paroleex- hearing, the secretary of corrections shall enter an order tended supervision be revoked.
Unlessrevoking waivedor bynot therevoking parolee,parole. the final administrative hearing shall be held before a hearing examiner from the division of hearings and appeals in the department of administration who is - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 SECTION 3 licensed to practice law in this state.
TheIf hearingthe examinerexaminer, shallthe enterad- anSECTION order3. revoking or not revoking parole.
Upon304.06 request(3) byof either party, the administratorstatutes ofis theamended divisionto ofministrator hearingsupon andreview, appealsor shallthe reviewsecretary in the order.case of a read:
Thewaiver hearingfinds examiner may order that athe depositionprisoner behas takenviolated by audiovisual means and allow the userules ofor a* recordedSection deposition991.11, underISCONSINSTATUTES: s.
967.04Effective (7)date toof (10).acts.
IfXEvery theact paroleeand waivesevery theportion finalof administrativean hearing,act enacted by the secretarylegislature ofover correctionsthe shallgov- enterernor's anpartial orderveto revokingwhich ordoes not revokingexpressly parole.Ifprescribe the examiner,time thewhen administratorit upontakes review,effect orshall thetake secretaryeffect inon the caseday ofafter aits waiverdate findsof thatpublication.Y theWisconsin prisonerAct has- violated2 the- rules2025 orAssembly Bill 85 conditions of parole, the examiner, the administrator uponrecommend review,that or the secretaryperson[s inprobation thebe caserevoked. of a waiver, may order the prisoner returned to prison to continue serving his or her sentence, or to continue on parole.
IfUn- upon review, or the prisonersecretary claimsin orthe appearscase toof bea indigent,waiver, less waived by the departmentprobationer, shalla referhearing examiner for may order the prisoner returned to prison to continue the authoritydivision forshall indigencyconduct determinationsan specifiedadministrative underhearing s.and serving his or her sentence, or to continue on parole.
If enter an order either revoking or not revoking probation.
the prisoner claims or appears to be indigent, the depart- Upon request of either party, the administrator of the di- ment shall refer the prisoner to the authority for indi- vision shall review the order.
If the probationer waives gency determinations specified under s.
Sthe ECTIONfinal administrative hearing, the secretary of correc- SECTION 4.
973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes is tions shall enter an order either revoking or not revoking amended to read:
973.10probation. (2) (intro.) If a probationer violates the conditions of probation, the department of corrections may initiate a proceeding before the division of hearings and appeals in the department of administration.
If the probationer is charged with a crime, the department shall recommend that the person’s probation be revoked.
Unless waived by the probationer, a hearing examiner for the division shall conduct an administrative hearing and enter an order either revoking or not revoking probation.
Upon request of either party, the administrator of the division shall review the order.
Show all 45 changed lines (5 more)
If the probationer waives the final administrative hearing, - 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-1596/1 CMH:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 85 S ECTION 4 the secretary of corrections shall enter an order either revoking or not revoking probation.
973.10 (2) (intro.) If a probationer violates the con- SECTION 5.
ditions of probation, the department of corrections may (1) The treatment of ss.
302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 initiate a proceeding before the division of hearings and (8m) (a), 304.06 (3), and 973.10 (2) (intro.) first applies toappeals chargesin that are filed on the effectivedepartment date of thisadministration. subsection.
ENDIf )the pro- to charges that are filed on the effective date of this bationer is charged with a crime, the department shall subsection.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025
-
Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025
-
Report correctly enrolled on 6-20-2025
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 14
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 6-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 43
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative McGuire
-
Read a second time
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Referred to calendar of 3-13-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 3, Noes 1
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced by Representatives B. Jacobson, Donovan, Duchow, Maxey, Murphy, Penterman, Wichgers and Knodl; cosponsored by Senators Hutton, Bradley, Jacque, Nass, Tomczyk, James and Wanggaard
Sponsors
- Hutton · Cosponsor
- Bradley · Cosponsor
- Jacque · Cosponsor
- Nass · Cosponsor
- Tomczyk · Cosponsor
- James · Cosponsor
- Wanggaard · Cosponsor
- Brent Jacobson · Primary
- Bob Donovan · Cosponsor
- Cindi Duchow · Cosponsor
- Dave Maxey · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Cosponsor
- William Penterman · Cosponsor
- Chuck Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Daniel Knodl · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 53 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jacobson, Brent Republican
Co-sponsors (14)
- Hutton
- Bradley
- Jacque
- Nass
- Tomczyk
- James
- Wanggaard
- Donovan, Bob Republican
- Duchow, Cindi Republican
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Penterman, William Republican
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 18 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 42% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| DASSLER-ALFHEI | — | Nay |
| HABUSH SINYKIN | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Not Voting |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Nay |
| Drake, Dora | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Keyeski, Sarah | Democrat | Nay |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Nay |
| Pfaff, Brad | Democrat | Nay |
| Ratcliff, Melissa | Democrat | Nay |
| Roys, Kelda | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Wall, Jamie | Democrat | Nay |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Julian | Republican | Yea |
| Cabral-Guevara, Rachael | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| James, Jesse | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Tomczyk, Cory | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
| Wimberger, Eric | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 52 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 41 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 53 | 44 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 44% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON | — | Nay |
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Nay |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Not Voting |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 85 do?
- An Act to amend 302.113 (8m) (a), 302.114 (8m) (a), 304.06 (3) and 973.10 (2) (intro.) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 85?
- AB 85 is sponsored by Hutton, Bradley, Jacque, Nass, Tomczyk, James, Wanggaard, Jacobson, Brent (Republican), Donovan, Bob (Republican), Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Penterman, William (Republican), Wichgers, Chuck (Republican), and Knodl, Daniel (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 85?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 28, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track AB 85?
- Track AB 85 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 85
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 85
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →