Relating to: referendum questions for certain referenda that affect property taxes. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 60 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 60.
You're tracking AB 60
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 60 — Relating to: referendum questions for certain referenda that affect property taxes. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to renumber and amend 67.05 (3) (d); to amend 38.16 (3) (br) 3., 66.0602 (4) (c) and 121.91 (3) (c); to create 67.05 (3) (d) 3., 4. and 5. of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies referendum requirements for property tax increases by mandating additional disclosures regarding estimated tax impacts and borrowing costs.
-
67.05 (3) (d)
3. The estimated interest rate and total amount of interest accruing on the maximum amount of bonds issued for the longest period authorized under the referendum. If the interest rate is a variable rate, the statement shall specify the amount of the interest accruing calculated by using the lowest rate during the term for which the rate is applicable and the amount of the interest accruing calculated by using the highest rate during the term for which the rate is applicable.
This addition requires the referendum question to include details about the estimated interest rates and total interest on bonds.
-
67.05 (3) (d)
4. Any fees that will be incurred if the bonds are defeased.
This change mandates disclosure of any fees associated with defeasing bonds in the referendum question.
-
67.05 (3) (d)
5. A good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the municipality if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
This provision requires a good faith estimate of the tax impact on a median home, enhancing transparency in the referendum process.
-
38.16 (3) (br)
The question shall also provide a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference, as defined in s. 67.05 (3) (d) 5., that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the district if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
This update stipulates that school district referendum questions must also disclose expected tax impacts on median-valued homes.
-
66.0602 (4) (c)
The question shall also provide a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference, as defined in s. 67.05 (3) (d) 5., that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the district if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
This amendment requires local government agencies to include estimated tax impacts on a median home in their referendum questions.
-
121.91 (3) (c)
The question shall also provide a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference, as defined in s. 67.05 (3) (d) 5., that would result for a median-valued, single-family residence located in the district if the referendum passes together with a statement of the property value used in calculating the estimate.
This change mandates that school district revenue limit referendum questions also include projected tax impacts on median-valued residences.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
-
Introduced by Representatives Allen, Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Murphy, O'Connor and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara, Jacque, Kapenga and Nass
Sponsors
- Cabral-Guevara · Cosponsor
- Jacque · Cosponsor
- Kapenga · Cosponsor
- Nass · Cosponsor
- Scott Allen · Primary
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Elijah Behnke · Cosponsor
- Lindee Brill · Cosponsor
- Barbara Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Joy Goeben · Cosponsor
- Chanz Green · Cosponsor
- Rick Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Daniel Knodl · Cosponsor
- Rob Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Dave Maxey · Cosponsor
- David Murphy · Cosponsor
- Jerry O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Chuck Wichgers · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Allen, Scott Republican
Co-sponsors (17)
- Cabral-Guevara
- Jacque
- Kapenga
- Nass
- Piwowarczyk, Jim Republican
- Behnke, Elijah Republican
- Brill, Lindee Republican
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
- Goeben, Joy Republican
- Green, Chanz Republican
- Gundrum, Rick Republican
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
- Kreibich, Rob Republican
- Maxey, Dave Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- O'Connor, Jerry Republican
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 60 do?
- An Act to renumber and amend 67.05 (3) (d); to amend 38.16 (3) (br) 3., 66.0602 (4) (c) and 121.91 (3) (c); to create 67.05 (3) (d) 3., 4. and 5. of the statutes;
- Who sponsors AB 60?
- AB 60 is sponsored by Cabral-Guevara, Jacque, Kapenga, Nass, Allen, Scott (Republican), Piwowarczyk, Jim (Republican), Behnke, Elijah (Republican), Brill, Lindee (Republican), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Goeben, Joy (Republican), Green, Chanz (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Kreibich, Rob (Republican), Maxey, Dave (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), O'Connor, Jerry (Republican), and Wichgers, Chuck (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 60?
- This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 24, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track AB 60?
- Track AB 60 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 60
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 60
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →