SA 3 to HB 75 —
Last action — Passed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced July 01, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
This amendment outlines legal processes for victims of sexual abuse to seek damages.
The amendment provides definitions and establishes processes for victims of sexual abuse to claim damages against alleged abusers and their employers. It also waives sovereign immunity for certain entities and sets limits on recoverable damages.
What this means for you
- Families: This amendment may provide families of abuse victims with clearer legal avenues to seek justice and compensation.
Summary
This Amendment does all of the following: (1) Provides definitions of terms used throughout this Act, including a definition of “person” for use when describing the employer of the victim’s alleged abuser. (2) Provides requirements for obtaining damages from a person that employed the victim’s alleged abuser, or had some degree of responsibility and control over the victim’s alleged abuser. (3) Specifically waives the sovereign immunity of this State or a county or other political subdivision of this State, including a school district and a charter school. (4) Provides that the victim’s alleged abuser and a person that employed the victim’s alleged abuser and owed a duty of care to the victim, or had some degree of responsibility and control over an activity which the victim and the victim’s alleged abuser were engaged in, are not joint tortfeasors. (5) Establishes limits on the damages that may be recovered by the victim. (6) Establishes evidentiary criteria for a civil cause of action for sexual abuse of a minor by an adult when the adult is deceased or not sufficiently competent to participate in the defense of the sexual abuse allegations. (7) Makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual, including by making words that are plural into words that are singular as § 304 of Title 1 provides that the singular includes the plural. This Amendment differs from Senate Amendment No. 1 by doing the following: (1) Redrafting for clarity the provisions related to scope and sovereign immunity, including clarifying that the waiver of sovereign immunity includes charter schools. (2) Clarifying that health care expenses include medical and counseling expenses (3) Providing that § 8145(f) through (i) of Title 10 applies only to sexual abuse that occurred on or before July 9, 2007.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SA 3 to HB 75 on the official Delaware source →Action History
-
Passed
Sponsors
- David P. Sokola · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- David P. Sokola Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (61)
61 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 61 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 29% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Cruce | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyra L. Hoffner | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Nay |
| Ray Seigfried | Democratic | Yea |
| Russell Huxtable | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Nay |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Not Voting |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Eric Buckson | Republican | Nay |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SA 3 to HB 75 do?
- This Amendment does all of the following: (1) Provides definitions of terms used throughout this Act, including a definition of “person” for use when describing the employer of the victim’s alleged abuser. (2) Provides requirements for obtaining damages from a person that employed the victim’s alleged abuser, or had some degree of responsibility and control over the victim’s alleged abuser. (3) Specifically waives the sovereign immunity of this State or a county or other political subdivision of this State, including a school district and a charter school. (4) Provides that the victim’s alleged abuser and a person that employed the victim’s alleged abuser and owed a duty of care to the victim, or had some degree of responsibility and control over an activity which the victim and the victim’s alleged abuser were engaged in, are not joint tortfeasors. (5) Establishes limits on the damages that may be recovered by the victim. (6) Establishes evidentiary criteria for a civil cause of action for sexual abuse of a minor by an adult when the adult is deceased or not sufficiently competent to participate in the defense of the sexual abuse allegations. (7) Makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual, including by making words that are plural into words that are singular as § 304 of Title 1 provides that the singular includes the plural. This Amendment differs from Senate Amendment No. 1 by doing the following: (1) Redrafting for clarity the provisions related to scope and sovereign immunity, including clarifying that the waiver of sovereign immunity includes charter schools. (2) Clarifying that health care expenses include medical and counseling expenses (3) Providing that § 8145(f) through (i) of Title 10 applies only to sexual abuse that occurred on or before July 9, 2007.
- Who sponsors SA 3 to HB 75?
- SA 3 to HB 75 is sponsored by David P. Sokola (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SA 3 to HB 75?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced July 01, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SA 3 to HB 75?
- Track SA 3 to HB 75 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SA 3 to HB 75
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SA 3 to HB 75
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →