California 20252026 Regular Session Status: Introduced 3 D cosponsors

AB 2034 — Food safety: unsafe additives and ingredient disclosures.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 17, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 32% · moderate confidence

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, under the administration and enforcement of the State Department of Public Health (department) , provides for the regulation of various subjects relating to the manufacturing, processing, labeling, advertising, and sale of food, drugs, and cosmetics. A violation of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law is punishable as a misdemeanor. Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to adulterate any food or to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale any food that is adulterated. Existing law deems a food as adulterated if it is, bears, or contains any food additive that is unsafe, or if it bears or contains any color additive or added poisonous or deleterious substance that is unsafe. Existing law deems, among other things, any food additive, color additive, or an added poisonous or deleterious substance as unsafe for use with respect to any food unless there is in effect a regulation, as specified, that limits the quantity and the use, or intended use, of the substance. This bill would deem a food additive or dietary ingredient as unsafe in food intended for humans with respect to its intended use unless the substance and its intended use meet a specified condition, including, among others, that the substance and its intended use were introduced after January 1, 1958, but before January 1, 2027, and are used in accordance with a published notice, as described below. Commencing July 1, 2027, if an individual intends to use a food additive or dietary ingredient in food intended for humans pursuant to these provisions, the bill would require the individual to submit a notice to the department that includes the same information required for a specified federal notice. The bill would require the department to verify the information and, if the information is complete, publish the notice in a public database, as specified. The bill would authorize the department, when assessing the safety of a food additive, to consider various factors, including, among others, whether the substance is banned or restricted in other jurisdictions due to concerns about adverse health consequences. The bill would require, on or before July 1, 2027, the manufacturer of any packaged food product that is sold in this state to provide the department with a complete and accurate list of its food products that, as of the date of submission, are sold in the state and that do not individually list each of the product's ingredients in the ingredient list on the product's label. For every product submitted, the bill would require the manufacturer to identify each ingredient not individually named in the ingredient list on the product's label, as specified. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Read second time and amended.

  6. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 14).

  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.S & T.M. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.

  8. (Pending re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M.)

  9. Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4433.)

  10. Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and E.S & T.M.

  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  12. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 4 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 4001
Republican 0200
Total 4201
% of votes cast 57%29%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Not Voting
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Castillo, Leticia Republican Nay
Ellis, Stan Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials]

Passed 10 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10002
Republican 0301
Total 10303
% of votes cast 63%19%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Ahrens, Patrick Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Not Voting
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Patel, Darshana R. Democratic Yea
Rogers, Chris Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Not Voting
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Johnson, Natasha Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety health-insurance agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2034 do?
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, under the administration and enforcement of the State Department of Public Health (department) , provides for the regulation of various subjects relating to the manufacturing, processing, labeling, advertising, and sale of food, drugs, and cosmetics. A violation of the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law is punishable as a misdemeanor. Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to adulterate any food or to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale any food that is adulterated. Existing law deems a food as adulterated if it is, bears, or contains any food additive that is unsafe, or if it bears or contains any color additive or added poisonous or deleterious substance that is unsafe. Existing law deems, among other things, any food additive, color additive, or an added poisonous or deleterious substance as unsafe for use with respect to any food unless there is in effect a regulation, as specified, that limits the quantity and the use, or intended use, of the substance. This bill would deem a food additive or dietary ingredient as unsafe in food intended for humans with respect to its intended use unless the substance and its intended use meet a specified condition, including, among others, that the substance and its intended use were introduced after January 1, 1958, but before January 1, 2027, and are used in accordance with a published notice, as described below. Commencing July 1, 2027, if an individual intends to use a food additive or dietary ingredient in food intended for humans pursuant to these provisions, the bill would require the individual to submit a notice to the department that includes the same information required for a specified federal notice. The bill would require the department to verify the information and, if the information is complete, publish the notice in a public database, as specified. The bill would authorize the department, when assessing the safety of a food additive, to consider various factors, including, among others, whether the substance is banned or restricted in other jurisdictions due to concerns about adverse health consequences. The bill would require, on or before July 1, 2027, the manufacturer of any packaged food product that is sold in this state to provide the department with a complete and accurate list of its food products that, as of the date of submission, are sold in the state and that do not individually list each of the product's ingredients in the ingredient list on the product's label. For every product submitted, the bill would require the manufacturer to identify each ingredient not individually named in the ingredient list on the product's label, as specified. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2034?
AB 2034 is sponsored by Addis, Dawn (Democratic), Hart, Gregg (Democratic), and Connolly, Damon (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2034?
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced February 17, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track AB 2034?
Track AB 2034 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2034

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2034

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →