SB 1377 — Immunizations: medical exemptions.
Last action — April 15 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 4. Page 3902.)
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 20, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Failed a recorded vote
Failed 1 recorded vote so far — a real headwind.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits the governing authority of a school or other institution from unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil unless, before the person's admission to that institution, the person has been fully immunized against various diseases, including any disease deemed appropriate by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law provides for medical exemptions from immunization requirements. Existing law requires the department to develop and make available for use by licensed physicians and surgeons an electronic, standardized, statewide medical exemption certification form to be transmitted directly to the department's California Immunization Registry (CAIR) and submitted directly to the school or institution at which the child will attend, submitted directly to the governing authority of the school or institution, or submitted to that governing authority through the CAIR where applicable. Existing law requires the form to be the only documentation of a medical exemption that the governing authority may accept. Existing law requires the department to identify medical exemption forms that do not meet specified criteria for appropriate medical exemptions. Existing law requires inappropriate or otherwise invalid exemptions to be reviewed by the State Public Health Officer or a physician and surgeon, and authorizes the revocation of the medical exemption. Existing law requires the department to notify the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, as appropriate, of any physician and surgeon who has 5 or more medical exemption forms in a calendar year that are revoked. Existing law authorizes the appeal of a revoked medical exemption by a parent or guardian, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions. Existing law, prior to January 1, 2021, exempts a child from immunization requirements if the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement by a licensed physician and surgeon to the effect that the physical condition of the child is such, or medical circumstances relating to the child are such, that immunization is not considered safe, indicating the specific nature and probable duration of the medical condition or circumstances for which the physician and surgeon does not recommend immunization. This bill would exempt a child from immunization requirements if the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement, as described above. The bill would prohibit the department, a local health department, or a third-party review panel from revoking, invalidating, or conditioning a medical exemption duly issued by a licensed physician and surgeon, except by final order of a court upon clear and convincing evidence of fraud. The bill would prohibit the department and local health departments from auditing, disciplining, or referring a physician and surgeon to the Medical Board of California or Osteopathic Medical Board of California based solely on the number of medical exemptions issued. (2) Existing law establishes the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons and osteopathic physicians and surgeons. Existing law authorizes the boards to, among other things, investigate and discipline licensees for misconduct. This bill would prohibit a physician and surgeon from being investigated, disciplined, or otherwise acted against by any state department or board based on their issuance of medical exemptions unless the medical exemption is found to be fraudulent or otherwise invalid. The bill would prohibit a medical exemption from being considered in any investigation or action against a physician and surgeon that is otherwise unrelated to medical exemptions. (3) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from denying coverage, imposing higher premiums, canceling a policy, or otherwise penalizing an enrollee or insured because a covered minor holds a medical exemption. Because a violation of this requirement by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit a health facility from denying medically necessary care on the basis of a medical exemption. Because a violation of this provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The bill would require the State Department of Public Health to repeal or amend any regulation inconsistent with this bill on or before July 1, 2027. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/25/26 - Amended Senate Current pdf March 25, 2026
- Introduced 02/20/26 - Introduced pdf February 20, 2026
- SB1377 View text html
Action History
-
April 15 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 4. Page 3902.)
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. P. & E.D.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Brian W. Jones · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 27% | 36% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Nay |
| Gonzalez, Lena A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Menjivar, Caroline | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Nay |
| Pérez, Sasha Renée | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Rubio, Susan | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1377 do?
- (1) Existing law prohibits the governing authority of a school or other institution from unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil unless, before the person's admission to that institution, the person has been fully immunized against various diseases, including any disease deemed appropriate by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law provides for medical exemptions from immunization requirements. Existing law requires the department to develop and make available for use by licensed physicians and surgeons an electronic, standardized, statewide medical exemption certification form to be transmitted directly to the department's California Immunization Registry (CAIR) and submitted directly to the school or institution at which the child will attend, submitted directly to the governing authority of the school or institution, or submitted to that governing authority through the CAIR where applicable. Existing law requires the form to be the only documentation of a medical exemption that the governing authority may accept. Existing law requires the department to identify medical exemption forms that do not meet specified criteria for appropriate medical exemptions. Existing law requires inappropriate or otherwise invalid exemptions to be reviewed by the State Public Health Officer or a physician and surgeon, and authorizes the revocation of the medical exemption. Existing law requires the department to notify the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, as appropriate, of any physician and surgeon who has 5 or more medical exemption forms in a calendar year that are revoked. Existing law authorizes the appeal of a revoked medical exemption by a parent or guardian, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions. Existing law, prior to January 1, 2021, exempts a child from immunization requirements if the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement by a licensed physician and surgeon to the effect that the physical condition of the child is such, or medical circumstances relating to the child are such, that immunization is not considered safe, indicating the specific nature and probable duration of the medical condition or circumstances for which the physician and surgeon does not recommend immunization. This bill would exempt a child from immunization requirements if the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement, as described above. The bill would prohibit the department, a local health department, or a third-party review panel from revoking, invalidating, or conditioning a medical exemption duly issued by a licensed physician and surgeon, except by final order of a court upon clear and convincing evidence of fraud. The bill would prohibit the department and local health departments from auditing, disciplining, or referring a physician and surgeon to the Medical Board of California or Osteopathic Medical Board of California based solely on the number of medical exemptions issued. (2) Existing law establishes the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons and osteopathic physicians and surgeons. Existing law authorizes the boards to, among other things, investigate and discipline licensees for misconduct. This bill would prohibit a physician and surgeon from being investigated, disciplined, or otherwise acted against by any state department or board based on their issuance of medical exemptions unless the medical exemption is found to be fraudulent or otherwise invalid. The bill would prohibit a medical exemption from being considered in any investigation or action against a physician and surgeon that is otherwise unrelated to medical exemptions. (3) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from denying coverage, imposing higher premiums, canceling a policy, or otherwise penalizing an enrollee or insured because a covered minor holds a medical exemption. Because a violation of this requirement by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit a health facility from denying medically necessary care on the basis of a medical exemption. Because a violation of this provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The bill would require the State Department of Public Health to repeal or amend any regulation inconsistent with this bill on or before July 1, 2027. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1377?
- SB 1377 is sponsored by Jones, Brian W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1377?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced February 20, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 1377?
- Track SB 1377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1377
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1377
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →