California 20252026 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

AB 134 — Public Safety.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 10, Statutes of 2025.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 08, 2025. It awaits signature.

Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 64% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Moderate

How often bills like it became law.

  • To Executive

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the Office of the Inspector General, which is responsible for, among other things, contemporaneous public oversight of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation investigations and staff grievance inquiries conducted by the department's Office of Internal Affairs. Existing law establishes within the office the California Rehabilitation Oversight Board, which consists of 11 members. Existing law requires the board, among other things, to regularly examine the various mental health, substance abuse, educational, and employment programs for incarcerated persons and parolees operated by the department. This bill would repeal the provisions establishing the board and its responsibilities. Existing law also requires the Inspector General to conduct an oversight and inspection program to periodically review delivery of the reforms identified in a specified document released by the department in 2012. This bill would remove the requirement that the Inspector General conduct that oversight and inspection program. The bill would also make conforming changes. Existing law requires the department to establish the California Reentry and Enrichment (CARE) Grant program to provide grants to community-based organizations that provide rehabilitative services to incarcerated individuals. Existing law requires the department to establish a CARE Grant program steering committee, which establishes grant criteria, select grant recipients, and determine grant amounts and the number of grants. Existing law requires the members of the committee to include, among others, a member from the Office of the Inspector General who is familiar with the work and objectives of the California Rehabilitation Oversight Board. This bill would delete the provisions requiring a member from the Office of the Inspector General. (2) Existing law establishes the Council on Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health within the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for the investigation and promotion of cost-effective approaches to meeting the long-term needs of adults and juveniles with behavioral health disorders who are likely to become offenders or who have a history of offending. Existing law supports county activities that will divert individuals with serious mental illnesses away from the criminal justice system, as specified, and requires the State Department of State Hospitals to, among other things, consult with the council to evaluate county proposals to help fund the development or expansion of mental health diversion, as specified. This bill would repeal the provisions that establish the council and make other conforming changes, including deleting the above-described requirement that the State Department of State Hospitals consult with the council to evaluate county proposals relating to mental health diversion. (3) Existing law creates the Recidivism Reduction Fund in the State Treasury, to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature, for activities designed to reduce the state's prison population, including, but not limited to, reducing recidivism. Existing law requires funds in the Recidivism Reduction Fund that were not encumbered by June 30, 2016, to revert to the General Fund and abolishes the fund when all encumbered funds are liquidated. Existing law requires, upon agreement to accept funding from the Recidivism Reduction Fund, a county board of supervisors, in collaboration with the county's Community Corrections Partnership, to develop, administer, collect, and submit data to the Board of State and Community Corrections regarding a competitive grant program intended to fund community recidivism and crime reduction services, including, but not limited to, delinquency prevention, homelessness prevention, and reentry services. Under existing law, commencing with specified fiscal years, the funding was allocated to counties based on a specified schedule. This bill would repeal the provisions mentioned above. (4) Existing law establishes the Board of State and Community Corrections and sets forth its powers and duties, including, among other things, collecting and maintaining available information and data about state and community correctional policies, practices, capacities, and needs. Existing law, commencing January 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, requires the board to collect and analyze available data regarding the implementation of local plans relating to the 2011 Public Safety Realignment and other outcome-based measures, as specified. Existing law, by July 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, requires the board to provide a report on the implementation of those plans to the Governor and the Legislature. This bill would delete the provisions requiring the board to collect and analyze data regarding the implementation of local plans, as specified, and to provide a report on the implementation of those plans to the Governor and the Legislature. Existing law requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to conduct a biennial inspection of each jail, juvenile hall, lockup, special purpose juvenile hall, camp, ranch, or secure youth treatment facility, as specified. Existing law specifies that a juvenile facility is unsuitable for the confinement of juveniles if the facility is not in compliance with one or more of the minimum standards for juvenile facilities adopted by the board and the facility has failed to file an approved corrective action plan with the board. Existing law requires, if a juvenile facility does not resolve the noncompliance issues outlined in its corrective plan, the board to make a determination of suitability at its next scheduled meeting. Existing law prohibits the facility from being used to confine juveniles if it is not being operated and maintained as a suitable place for the confinement of juveniles. This bill would authorize the board to delegate authority to approve or disapprove a corrective action plan to the board's executive director or a deputy director. The bill would, if that authority is delegated, require the delegee to approve or disapprove the corrective action plan in accordance with criteria and considerations established by the board and require the board to subsequently ratify or overrule the corrective action plan. The bill would also authorize the board to bring a civil action to enforce compliance with minimum standards for juvenile facilities or closure in the superior court in the county in which a facility is located. (5) Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to implement literacy programs in the state prison. Existing law requires the department to make college programs available for the benefit of inmates with a general education development certificate or equivalent or a high school diploma and requires those college programs to only be provided by the California Community Colleges, the California State University, the University of California, or other regionally accredited, nonprofit colleges or universities. This bill would authorize those college programs to be provided by accredited public or nonprofit colleges or universities outside of the state, as specified. Existing law requires an inmate who is enrolled, pursuant to these provisions, in a full-time college program consisting of 12 semester units, or the academic quarter equivalent, of credit-bearing courses leading to an associate degree or a bachelor's degree to be deemed by the department to be assigned to a full-time work or training assignment. This bill would instead require an inmate enrolled in a degree-granting college or university program, as specified, to receive the same privileges as an inmate with a full-time work or training assignment. (6) Existing law requires any person employed or under contract to provide mental health diagnostic, treatment, or other mental health services in the state correctional system to be a physician and surgeon, psychologist, or other health professional, licensed to practice in this state, except as specified. Existing law authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to waive that requirement for persons in the professions of psychology or social work who are gaining qualifying experience for licensure in that profession in this state. For persons employed less than full time as psychologists or clinical social workers, existing law authorizes an extension of a waiver to be granted for additional years proportional to the extent of part-time employment, as provided, but prohibits the waiver from exceeding 6 years in the case of clinical social workers or 5 years in the case of psychologists. This bill would additionally allow mental health professionals to be employed or under contract to provide mental health diagnostic, treatment, or other mental health services in the state correctional system. The bill would authorize the secretary to additionally waive that requirement for persons in the professions of marriage and family therapy or professional clinical counseling who are gaining qualifying experience for licensure in those professions. The bill would additionally authorize an extension of a waiver to persons employed less than full time as marriage and family therapists or professional clinical counselors and prohibit the waiver from exceeding 6 years for those professions. (7) Existing law generally provides for the control and prevention of tuberculosis. Existing law requires various state entities, including the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, to meet and confer with recognized employee organizations, as specified, to develop rules regarding the mandatory examination or testing for tuberculosis of the staff of those entities. Existing law prohibits a person from being employed by the department unless that person, after an offer of employment, completes an examination, test, or medical evaluation and is found to be free of tuberculosis prior to assuming work duties. As a condition of continued employment with the department, existing law requires employees who are skin-test negative to receive an examination or test at least once a year, or more often if directed by the department, for as long as the employee remains skin-test negative. Existing law defines various terms for purposes of these provisions. This bill would revise and recast the above-described provisions to require the department to develop rules regarding the mandatory examination or testing for tuberculosis of its staff, as specified. The bill would require a person who is employed by the department and whose primary job functions require them to work inside an institution to complete baseline TB screening and testing and provide a certificate to the department within seven days of appointment to their position showing they are free of active tuberculosis. The bill would require specified employees to receive annual TB screening and ensure that certificates are submitted and accepted by the department, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to require more frequent TB screening or testing, as specified, if there is a known exposure or ongoing transmission within an institution. The bill would delete obsolete definitions, update other definitions, and define additional terms, including "annual TB screening" and "baseline TB screening and testing." Existing law requires volunteers of the department, prior to assuming their duties and annually thereafter, to furnish the department with a certificate showing that they have been examined and found to be free of tuberculosis. Existing law requires employees from other state agencies who are assigned to work in an institution to comply with prescribed requirements for tuberculosis control and requires the department to offer examinations, tests, or medical evaluations to those employees. Existing law prohibits the department from discriminating against an employee because the employee tested positive for tuberculosis. Existing law requires specified state entities, including the department, to report to the State Department of Health Care Services the results of these tuberculosis examinations. This bill would delete those provisions. (8) Existing law defines those persons who are peace officers in the state, grants certain authority to those individuals and their employing entities, and places certain requirements on those individuals and their employing entities. Existing law also grants specified limited arrest authority to certain other persons, including federal criminal investigators and park rangers and peace officers from adjoining jurisdictions. Existing federal law authorizes tribal governments to employ tribal police for the enforcement of tribal law on tribal lands. Existing federal law requires the State of California to exercise criminal jurisdiction on Indian lands. Existing state law deems a tribal police officer who has been deputized or appointed by a county sheriff as a reserve or auxiliary deputy to be a peace officer in the State of California. This bill would, from July 1, 2026, until July 1, 2029, establish a pilot program under the Department of Justice and the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training granting peace officer authority to certain tribal police officers on Indian lands and elsewhere in the state under specified circumstances. The bill would authorize the department to select 3 tribal entities to participate, would set certain minimum qualifications and certification and training requirements for a tribal officer to act pursuant to this authority, and would place certain requirements on the employing tribe, including a limited waiver of sovereign immunity, and the adoption of a tribal law or resolution authorizing that exercise of authority and providing for public access to certain records. The bill would require the Department of Justice to provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation and to prepare and submit reports to the Legislature, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county to establish an interagency domestic violence death review team to assist local agencies in identifying and reviewing domestic violence deaths, including homicides and suicides, and facilitating communication among various agencies involved in domestic violence cases. Under existing law, an oral or written communication or a document provided by a third party to a domestic violence review team is confidential and not subject to disclosure or discovery. This bill would authorize a tribe participating in this pilot program to establish a domestic violence death review team subject to the applicable provisions of this law. This bill would also authorize participating tribes to enter into an agreement to share liability and collaborate on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons cases. This bill would create the Tribal Police Pilot Fund in the State Treasury to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, assist program participants with the cost of information technology necessary for complying with reporting requirements for law enforcement agencies. This bill would provide for implementation of all of these provisions only upon an appropriation by the Legislature for these purposes. (9) The bill would appropriate $5,000,000 for the 2025–26 fiscal year from the General Fund to the Department of Justice for purposes of administering the Tribal Police Pilot Program pursuant to Article 2.45 (commencing with Section 11073) of Chapter 1 of Title 1 of Part 4 of the Penal Code, as specified. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 10, Statutes of 2025.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:15 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 1. Page 2336.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 54. Noes 19. Page 2329.)

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 1806.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (June 25).

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F. R.

  11. Referred to Com. on B. & F. R.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 730.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 643.)

  16. Ordered to second reading.

  17. Withdrawn from committee.

  18. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  19. From printer. May be heard in committee February 8.

  20. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 26 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 29 Yea · 9 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 29001
Republican 0901
Total 29902
% of votes cast 73%23%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Arreguín, Jesse Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Not Voting
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 72 Yea · 1 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 14104
Democratic 57002
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 72106
% of votes cast 91%1%0%8%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Ávila Farías — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Ahrens, Patrick Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Elhawary, Sade Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Harabedian, John Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Krell, Maggy Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Patel, Darshana R. Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Not Voting
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Ransom, Rhodesia Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Celeste Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Michelle Democratic Yea
Rogers, Chris Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Schultz, Nick Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Yea
Solache, Jr., José Luis Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Castillo, Leticia Republican Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
DeMaio, Carl Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Yea
Ellis, Stan Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Gonzalez, Jeff Republican Yea
Hadwick, Heather Republican Yea
Hoover, Josh Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Macedo, Alexandra Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting
Sanchez, Kate Republican Yea
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Tangipa, David J. Republican Not Voting
Wallis, Greg Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 13 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 13000
Republican 0401
Total 13401
% of votes cast 72%22%0%6%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 53 Yea · 17 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 52007
Unaffiliated 1001
Republican 01702
Total 5317010
% of votes cast 66%21%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Ávila Farías — Yea
Essayli — Not Voting
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Ahrens, Patrick Democratic Not Voting
Alvarez, David Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Elhawary, Sade Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Harabedian, John Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Krell, Maggy Democratic Not Voting
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Not Voting
Patel, Darshana R. Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Ransom, Rhodesia Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Celeste Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Michelle Democratic Yea
Rogers, Chris Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Schultz, Nick Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Yea
Solache, Jr., José Luis Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Castillo, Leticia Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
DeMaio, Carl Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Ellis, Stan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Gonzalez, Jeff Republican Nay
Hadwick, Heather Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Macedo, Alexandra Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Tangipa, David J. Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 134 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the Office of the Inspector General, which is responsible for, among other things, contemporaneous public oversight of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation investigations and staff grievance inquiries conducted by the department's Office of Internal Affairs. Existing law establishes within the office the California Rehabilitation Oversight Board, which consists of 11 members. Existing law requires the board, among other things, to regularly examine the various mental health, substance abuse, educational, and employment programs for incarcerated persons and parolees operated by the department. This bill would repeal the provisions establishing the board and its responsibilities. Existing law also requires the Inspector General to conduct an oversight and inspection program to periodically review delivery of the reforms identified in a specified document released by the department in 2012. This bill would remove the requirement that the Inspector General conduct that oversight and inspection program. The bill would also make conforming changes. Existing law requires the department to establish the California Reentry and Enrichment (CARE) Grant program to provide grants to community-based organizations that provide rehabilitative services to incarcerated individuals. Existing law requires the department to establish a CARE Grant program steering committee, which establishes grant criteria, select grant recipients, and determine grant amounts and the number of grants. Existing law requires the members of the committee to include, among others, a member from the Office of the Inspector General who is familiar with the work and objectives of the California Rehabilitation Oversight Board. This bill would delete the provisions requiring a member from the Office of the Inspector General. (2) Existing law establishes the Council on Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health within the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for the investigation and promotion of cost-effective approaches to meeting the long-term needs of adults and juveniles with behavioral health disorders who are likely to become offenders or who have a history of offending. Existing law supports county activities that will divert individuals with serious mental illnesses away from the criminal justice system, as specified, and requires the State Department of State Hospitals to, among other things, consult with the council to evaluate county proposals to help fund the development or expansion of mental health diversion, as specified. This bill would repeal the provisions that establish the council and make other conforming changes, including deleting the above-described requirement that the State Department of State Hospitals consult with the council to evaluate county proposals relating to mental health diversion. (3) Existing law creates the Recidivism Reduction Fund in the State Treasury, to be available upon appropriation by the Legislature, for activities designed to reduce the state's prison population, including, but not limited to, reducing recidivism. Existing law requires funds in the Recidivism Reduction Fund that were not encumbered by June 30, 2016, to revert to the General Fund and abolishes the fund when all encumbered funds are liquidated. Existing law requires, upon agreement to accept funding from the Recidivism Reduction Fund, a county board of supervisors, in collaboration with the county's Community Corrections Partnership, to develop, administer, collect, and submit data to the Board of State and Community Corrections regarding a competitive grant program intended to fund community recidivism and crime reduction services, including, but not limited to, delinquency prevention, homelessness prevention, and reentry services. Under existing law, commencing with specified fiscal years, the funding was allocated to counties based on a specified schedule. This bill would repeal the provisions mentioned above. (4) Existing law establishes the Board of State and Community Corrections and sets forth its powers and duties, including, among other things, collecting and maintaining available information and data about state and community correctional policies, practices, capacities, and needs. Existing law, commencing January 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, requires the board to collect and analyze available data regarding the implementation of local plans relating to the 2011 Public Safety Realignment and other outcome-based measures, as specified. Existing law, by July 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, requires the board to provide a report on the implementation of those plans to the Governor and the Legislature. This bill would delete the provisions requiring the board to collect and analyze data regarding the implementation of local plans, as specified, and to provide a report on the implementation of those plans to the Governor and the Legislature. Existing law requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to conduct a biennial inspection of each jail, juvenile hall, lockup, special purpose juvenile hall, camp, ranch, or secure youth treatment facility, as specified. Existing law specifies that a juvenile facility is unsuitable for the confinement of juveniles if the facility is not in compliance with one or more of the minimum standards for juvenile facilities adopted by the board and the facility has failed to file an approved corrective action plan with the board. Existing law requires, if a juvenile facility does not resolve the noncompliance issues outlined in its corrective plan, the board to make a determination of suitability at its next scheduled meeting. Existing law prohibits the facility from being used to confine juveniles if it is not being operated and maintained as a suitable place for the confinement of juveniles. This bill would authorize the board to delegate authority to approve or disapprove a corrective action plan to the board's executive director or a deputy director. The bill would, if that authority is delegated, require the delegee to approve or disapprove the corrective action plan in accordance with criteria and considerations established by the board and require the board to subsequently ratify or overrule the corrective action plan. The bill would also authorize the board to bring a civil action to enforce compliance with minimum standards for juvenile facilities or closure in the superior court in the county in which a facility is located. (5) Existing law requires the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to implement literacy programs in the state prison. Existing law requires the department to make college programs available for the benefit of inmates with a general education development certificate or equivalent or a high school diploma and requires those college programs to only be provided by the California Community Colleges, the California State University, the University of California, or other regionally accredited, nonprofit colleges or universities. This bill would authorize those college programs to be provided by accredited public or nonprofit colleges or universities outside of the state, as specified. Existing law requires an inmate who is enrolled, pursuant to these provisions, in a full-time college program consisting of 12 semester units, or the academic quarter equivalent, of credit-bearing courses leading to an associate degree or a bachelor's degree to be deemed by the department to be assigned to a full-time work or training assignment. This bill would instead require an inmate enrolled in a degree-granting college or university program, as specified, to receive the same privileges as an inmate with a full-time work or training assignment. (6) Existing law requires any person employed or under contract to provide mental health diagnostic, treatment, or other mental health services in the state correctional system to be a physician and surgeon, psychologist, or other health professional, licensed to practice in this state, except as specified. Existing law authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to waive that requirement for persons in the professions of psychology or social work who are gaining qualifying experience for licensure in that profession in this state. For persons employed less than full time as psychologists or clinical social workers, existing law authorizes an extension of a waiver to be granted for additional years proportional to the extent of part-time employment, as provided, but prohibits the waiver from exceeding 6 years in the case of clinical social workers or 5 years in the case of psychologists. This bill would additionally allow mental health professionals to be employed or under contract to provide mental health diagnostic, treatment, or other mental health services in the state correctional system. The bill would authorize the secretary to additionally waive that requirement for persons in the professions of marriage and family therapy or professional clinical counseling who are gaining qualifying experience for licensure in those professions. The bill would additionally authorize an extension of a waiver to persons employed less than full time as marriage and family therapists or professional clinical counselors and prohibit the waiver from exceeding 6 years for those professions. (7) Existing law generally provides for the control and prevention of tuberculosis. Existing law requires various state entities, including the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, to meet and confer with recognized employee organizations, as specified, to develop rules regarding the mandatory examination or testing for tuberculosis of the staff of those entities. Existing law prohibits a person from being employed by the department unless that person, after an offer of employment, completes an examination, test, or medical evaluation and is found to be free of tuberculosis prior to assuming work duties. As a condition of continued employment with the department, existing law requires employees who are skin-test negative to receive an examination or test at least once a year, or more often if directed by the department, for as long as the employee remains skin-test negative. Existing law defines various terms for purposes of these provisions. This bill would revise and recast the above-described provisions to require the department to develop rules regarding the mandatory examination or testing for tuberculosis of its staff, as specified. The bill would require a person who is employed by the department and whose primary job functions require them to work inside an institution to complete baseline TB screening and testing and provide a certificate to the department within seven days of appointment to their position showing they are free of active tuberculosis. The bill would require specified employees to receive annual TB screening and ensure that certificates are submitted and accepted by the department, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to require more frequent TB screening or testing, as specified, if there is a known exposure or ongoing transmission within an institution. The bill would delete obsolete definitions, update other definitions, and define additional terms, including "annual TB screening" and "baseline TB screening and testing." Existing law requires volunteers of the department, prior to assuming their duties and annually thereafter, to furnish the department with a certificate showing that they have been examined and found to be free of tuberculosis. Existing law requires employees from other state agencies who are assigned to work in an institution to comply with prescribed requirements for tuberculosis control and requires the department to offer examinations, tests, or medical evaluations to those employees. Existing law prohibits the department from discriminating against an employee because the employee tested positive for tuberculosis. Existing law requires specified state entities, including the department, to report to the State Department of Health Care Services the results of these tuberculosis examinations. This bill would delete those provisions. (8) Existing law defines those persons who are peace officers in the state, grants certain authority to those individuals and their employing entities, and places certain requirements on those individuals and their employing entities. Existing law also grants specified limited arrest authority to certain other persons, including federal criminal investigators and park rangers and peace officers from adjoining jurisdictions. Existing federal law authorizes tribal governments to employ tribal police for the enforcement of tribal law on tribal lands. Existing federal law requires the State of California to exercise criminal jurisdiction on Indian lands. Existing state law deems a tribal police officer who has been deputized or appointed by a county sheriff as a reserve or auxiliary deputy to be a peace officer in the State of California. This bill would, from July 1, 2026, until July 1, 2029, establish a pilot program under the Department of Justice and the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training granting peace officer authority to certain tribal police officers on Indian lands and elsewhere in the state under specified circumstances. The bill would authorize the department to select 3 tribal entities to participate, would set certain minimum qualifications and certification and training requirements for a tribal officer to act pursuant to this authority, and would place certain requirements on the employing tribe, including a limited waiver of sovereign immunity, and the adoption of a tribal law or resolution authorizing that exercise of authority and providing for public access to certain records. The bill would require the Department of Justice to provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation and to prepare and submit reports to the Legislature, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county to establish an interagency domestic violence death review team to assist local agencies in identifying and reviewing domestic violence deaths, including homicides and suicides, and facilitating communication among various agencies involved in domestic violence cases. Under existing law, an oral or written communication or a document provided by a third party to a domestic violence review team is confidential and not subject to disclosure or discovery. This bill would authorize a tribe participating in this pilot program to establish a domestic violence death review team subject to the applicable provisions of this law. This bill would also authorize participating tribes to enter into an agreement to share liability and collaborate on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons cases. This bill would create the Tribal Police Pilot Fund in the State Treasury to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, assist program participants with the cost of information technology necessary for complying with reporting requirements for law enforcement agencies. This bill would provide for implementation of all of these provisions only upon an appropriation by the Legislature for these purposes. (9) The bill would appropriate $5,000,000 for the 2025–26 fiscal year from the General Fund to the Department of Justice for purposes of administering the Tribal Police Pilot Program pursuant to Article 2.45 (commencing with Section 11073) of Chapter 1 of Title 1 of Part 4 of the Penal Code, as specified. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 134?
AB 134 is sponsored by Gabriel, Jesse (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 134?
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 08, 2025. It awaits signature.
Where can I track AB 134?
Track AB 134 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 134

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 134

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →