AB 433 — Mental health diversion.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Assembly. Introduced February 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Assembly.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Failed a recorded vote
Failed 1 recorded vote so far — a real headwind.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant diagnosed with a mental disorder if the defendant satisfies certain eligibility requirements and if the court determines that the defendant is suitable for diversion. Existing law excludes a defendant from diversion for specified charged offenses, including, among others, murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape, or continuous sexual abuse of a child, as specified. This bill would expand those exclusions to prohibit a defendant from being placed into a diversion program if they are charged with child abuse and endangerment, inflicting cruel or inhuman corporal punishment on a child resulting in an injury, assault of a child under 8 years of age resulting in the death of the child, human trafficking, and any crime that causes great bodily injury, as specified.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill AB 433 has had an addition that clarifies a specific provision in the legislation. This change helps ensure that the bill is easier to understand and implement. By making this adjustment, lawmakers aim to improve the effectiveness of the proposed law and address any potential confusion among those who will be affected by it.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/05/25 - Introduced Current pdf February 05, 2025
- AB433 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Maggy Krell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Krell, Maggy Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 22% | 44% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| González, Mark | Democratic | Nay |
| Harabedian, John | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Schultz, Nick | Democratic | Nay |
| Sharp-Collins, LaShae | Democratic | Nay |
| Alanis, Juan | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 433 do?
- Existing law authorizes the court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant diagnosed with a mental disorder if the defendant satisfies certain eligibility requirements and if the court determines that the defendant is suitable for diversion. Existing law excludes a defendant from diversion for specified charged offenses, including, among others, murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape, or continuous sexual abuse of a child, as specified. This bill would expand those exclusions to prohibit a defendant from being placed into a diversion program if they are charged with child abuse and endangerment, inflicting cruel or inhuman corporal punishment on a child resulting in an injury, assault of a child under 8 years of age resulting in the death of the child, human trafficking, and any crime that causes great bodily injury, as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 433?
- AB 433 is sponsored by Krell, Maggy (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 433?
- This bill is in committee in the Assembly. Introduced February 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track AB 433?
- Track AB 433 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 433
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 433
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →