An Act amending the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Ac...
This bill amends the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act to clarify definitions and establish requirements for redevelopment assistance capital projects, particularly involving schools. It specifies who can apply for funding and the conditions that projects must meet.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2860 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2860.
You're tracking HB 2860
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2860 — An Act amending the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, in capital facilities, further providing for definitions and for administration of redevelopment assistance capital projects.
Last action — Referred to COMMERCE, Oct. 19, 2026
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced October 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
27 sponsors
1 primary, 26 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (25 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill updates definitions and requirements for certain redevelopment projects in Pennsylvania.
This bill amends the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act to clarify definitions and establish requirements for redevelopment assistance capital projects, particularly involving schools. It specifies who can apply for funding and the conditions that projects must meet.
What this means for you
- Small Business: For small businesses, the amendments may provide more clarity on funding opportunities for redevelopment projects.
Summary
RACP for Schools
Bill Text
- Printer's No. 4058 View text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends definitions related to redevelopment assistance capital projects and changes procurement requirements for these projects.
-
Section 302
Notwithstanding→ Except for a school remediation project and notwithstanding any other provision of lawClarifies that the bid requirements apply except for school remediation projects.
-
Section 302
Is→ Except for a school remediation project, isSpecifies that certain criteria for a redevelopment assistance capital project do not apply to school remediation projects.
-
Section 302
Has→ Except for a school remediation project, hasIndicates that a specific financial requirement is waived for school remediation projects.
-
Section 302
Has→ Except for a school remediation project, hasAdds an exception for school remediation projects regarding the total project cost requirement.
-
Section 318(f)
Notwithstanding→ Except for a school remediation project and notwithstanding any other provision of law,Indicates that exceptions will be made for school remediation projects in bid requirements.
-
Section 302
A school remediation project shall have an estimated total project cost of at least $100,000.
Establishes a minimum cost for school remediation projects.
-
Section 302
Is→ A project does not include highways, bridges, waste disposal facilities, sewage facilities or water facilities.Clarifies the scope of what constitutes a redevelopment assistance capital project.
-
Section 318(f)
the foregoing→ paragraph (1)Adjusts phrasing for clarity in the requirements for construction work.
Action History
-
Referred to COMMERCE, Oct. 19, 2026
Sponsors
- Elizabeth Fiedler · Primary
- Robert E. Merski · Cosponsor
- Bridget M. Kosierowski · Cosponsor
- Jeanne McNeill · Cosponsor
- Sean Dougherty · Cosponsor
- INGLIS · Cosponsor
- Ben Waxman · Cosponsor
- Jose Giral · Cosponsor
- Liz Hanbidge · Cosponsor
- Jen Mazzocco · Cosponsor
- Jim Prokopiak · Cosponsor
- Tarah Probst · Cosponsor
- Steven R. Malagari · Cosponsor
- Carol Hill-Evans · Cosponsor
- Rick Krajewski · Cosponsor
- Danielle Friel Otten · Cosponsor
- Anthony A. Bellmon · Cosponsor
- Benjamin V. Sanchez · Cosponsor
- Brandon Dukes · Cosponsor
- Tim Brennan · Cosponsor
- Daniel J. Deasy · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Harkins · Cosponsor
- Darisha K. Parker · Cosponsor
- Dan K. Williams · Cosponsor
- Jacklyn Rusnock · Cosponsor
- Jennifer O'Mara · Cosponsor
- Thomas H. Kutz · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 26 co-sponsors · 226 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Elizabeth Fiedler Democratic
Co-sponsors (26)
- Robert E. Merski Democratic
- Bridget M. Kosierowski Democratic
- Jeanne McNeill Democratic
- Sean Dougherty Democratic
- INGLIS
- Ben Waxman Democratic
- Jose Giral Democratic
- Liz Hanbidge Democratic
- Jen Mazzocco Democratic
- Jim Prokopiak Democratic
- Tarah Probst Democratic
- Steven R. Malagari Democratic
- Carol Hill-Evans Democratic
- Rick Krajewski Democratic
- Danielle Friel Otten Democratic
- Anthony A. Bellmon Democratic
- Benjamin V. Sanchez Democratic
- Brandon Dukes Democratic
- Tim Brennan Democratic
- Daniel J. Deasy Democratic
- Patrick J. Harkins Democratic
- Darisha K. Parker Democratic
- Dan K. Williams Democratic
- Jacklyn Rusnock Democratic
- Jennifer O'Mara Democratic
- Thomas H. Kutz Republican
Not signed on (226)
226 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 226 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 2860 do?
- RACP for Schools
- Who sponsors HB 2860?
- HB 2860 is sponsored by Elizabeth Fiedler (Democratic), Robert E. Merski (Democratic), Bridget M. Kosierowski (Democratic), Jeanne McNeill (Democratic), Sean Dougherty (Democratic), INGLIS, Ben Waxman (Democratic), Jose Giral (Democratic), Liz Hanbidge (Democratic), Jen Mazzocco (Democratic), Jim Prokopiak (Democratic), Tarah Probst (Democratic), Steven R. Malagari (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Rick Krajewski (Democratic), Danielle Friel Otten (Democratic), Anthony A. Bellmon (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Brandon Dukes (Democratic), Tim Brennan (Democratic), Daniel J. Deasy (Democratic), Patrick J. Harkins (Democratic), Darisha K. Parker (Democratic), Dan K. Williams (Democratic), Jacklyn Rusnock (Democratic), Jennifer O'Mara (Democratic), and Thomas H. Kutz (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2860?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced October 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 2860?
- Track HB 2860 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2860
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2860
Last checked for changes 2 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →