Pennsylvania 2025_0 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 25 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 2860 — An Act amending the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, in capital facilities, further providing for definitions and for administration of redevelopment assistance capital projects.

Last action — Referred to COMMERCE, Oct. 19, 2026

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced October 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 27 sponsors

    1 primary, 26 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (25 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill updates definitions and requirements for certain redevelopment projects in Pennsylvania.

This bill amends the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act to clarify definitions and establish requirements for redevelopment assistance capital projects, particularly involving schools. It specifies who can apply for funding and the conditions that projects must meet.

What this means for you
  • Small Business: For small businesses, the amendments may provide more clarity on funding opportunities for redevelopment projects.

Summary

RACP for Schools

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

8 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill amends definitions related to redevelopment assistance capital projects and changes procurement requirements for these projects.

  • Section 302

    Notwithstanding → Except for a school remediation project and notwithstanding any other provision of law

    Clarifies that the bid requirements apply except for school remediation projects.

  • Section 302

    Is → Except for a school remediation project, is

    Specifies that certain criteria for a redevelopment assistance capital project do not apply to school remediation projects.

  • Section 302

    Has → Except for a school remediation project, has

    Indicates that a specific financial requirement is waived for school remediation projects.

  • Section 302

    Has → Except for a school remediation project, has

    Adds an exception for school remediation projects regarding the total project cost requirement.

  • Section 318(f)

    Notwithstanding → Except for a school remediation project and notwithstanding any other provision of law,

    Indicates that exceptions will be made for school remediation projects in bid requirements.

  • Section 302

    A school remediation project shall have an estimated total project cost of at least $100,000.

    Establishes a minimum cost for school remediation projects.

  • Section 302

    Is → A project does not include highways, bridges, waste disposal facilities, sewage facilities or water facilities.

    Clarifies the scope of what constitutes a redevelopment assistance capital project.

  • Section 318(f)

    the foregoing → paragraph (1)

    Adjusts phrasing for clarity in the requirements for construction work.

Action History

  1. Referred to COMMERCE, Oct. 19, 2026

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 26 co-sponsors · 226 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (26)

Not signed on (226)

226 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 226 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 2860 do?
RACP for Schools
Who sponsors HB 2860?
HB 2860 is sponsored by Elizabeth Fiedler (Democratic), Robert E. Merski (Democratic), Bridget M. Kosierowski (Democratic), Jeanne McNeill (Democratic), Sean Dougherty (Democratic), INGLIS, Ben Waxman (Democratic), Jose Giral (Democratic), Liz Hanbidge (Democratic), Jen Mazzocco (Democratic), Jim Prokopiak (Democratic), Tarah Probst (Democratic), Steven R. Malagari (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Rick Krajewski (Democratic), Danielle Friel Otten (Democratic), Anthony A. Bellmon (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Brandon Dukes (Democratic), Tim Brennan (Democratic), Daniel J. Deasy (Democratic), Patrick J. Harkins (Democratic), Darisha K. Parker (Democratic), Dan K. Williams (Democratic), Jacklyn Rusnock (Democratic), Jennifer O'Mara (Democratic), and Thomas H. Kutz (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2860?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced October 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 2860?
Track HB 2860 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2860

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2860

Last checked for changes 2 days ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →