Requires municipalities to specify in ordinance implementing eminent domain particular use intended for pro...
This bill mandates that municipalities specify the particular use they intend for property when implementing eminent domain. The precise text of the bill is not available.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 4850 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 4850.
You're tracking S 4850
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 4850 — Requires municipalities to specify in ordinance implementing eminent domain particular use intended for property.
Last action — INT 1RS REF SCU
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed General Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced October 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
Requires municipalities to state intended use when enacting eminent domain.
This bill mandates that municipalities specify the particular use they intend for property when implementing eminent domain. The precise text of the bill is not available.
Summary
Real property by municipalities-concerns ordinance implementing eminent domain
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read S 4850 on the official New Jersey source →Action History
-
INT 1RS REF SCU
Sponsors
- Michael L. Testa Jr. · Primary
- Brian P. Stack · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Testa Jr., Michael L. Republican
- Stack, Brian P. Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 4850 do?
- Real property by municipalities-concerns ordinance implementing eminent domain
- Who sponsors S 4850?
- S 4850 is sponsored by Testa Jr., Michael L. (Republican) and Stack, Brian P. (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 4850?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced October 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 4850?
- Track S 4850 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 4850
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 4850
Last checked for changes 9 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →