California 20252026 Regular Session Status: Introduced 1 D cosponsors

AB 193 — Public resources: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: programs.

Last action — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 31).

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 28% · moderate confidence
  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill modifies allocations and management of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and extends certain energy efficiency programs.

This bill adjusts how funds from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund are allocated and managed, extending the operational timeline of an energy efficiency program for schools. It also specifies new funding priorities and provides for administrative support for transportation programs.

What this means for you
  • Families: Families may benefit from improved energy efficiency in schools, potentially leading to healthier learning environments.

Summary

The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt regulations for greenhouse gas emissions limits and emissions reduction measures to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, as provided. The act authorizes that state board to include in those regulations the use of a market-based compliance mechanism to comply with those regulations. Existing law requires moneys collected by the state board from the auction or sale of allowances as part of a market-based compliance mechanism to be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Existing law allocates moneys in the fund in a specified priority and continuously appropriates a certain amount of moneys in the fund for certain purposes. This bill would require interest income earned on those moneys to be deposited into the fund. By depositing additional moneys into a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires that moneys in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund be allocated based on 4 priority levels with the first priority level being certain amounts, including amounts to replace revenues generated by the State Responsibility Area fire prevention fee, the 2nd priority level being certain amounts, including $1,000,000,000 that is continuously appropriated to the High-Speed Rail Authority for certain purposes, the 3rd priority level being certain amounts, including $800,000,000 that is continuously appropriated to the Strategic Growth Council for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program and $200,000,000 that is continuously appropriated to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection with 82.5% of that amount for health forest and fire prevention programs and projects and 17.5% of that amount for the completion of prescribed fire and other fuel reduction projects, as provided, and the 4th priority level being any amount not needed to fully fund the first 3 priority levels being available for appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would include in the first priority level for allocation from the fund any state operation costs, as proposed by the Department of Finance, appropriated in the annual Budget Act or other statute and certain administrative costs. The bill would authorize the use of moneys continuously appropriated to the High-Speed Rail Authority under the 2nd priority level for state operations costs for the High-Speed Rail Authority. The bill would instead specify the allocations of $800,000,000 continuously appropriated for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, with $560,000,000 continuously appropriated to the Housing Development and Finance Committee for affordable rental or owner-occupied housing projects, thereby making an appropriation, and $240,000,000 continuously appropriated to the Strategic Growth Council for, among other things, projects or programs designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other criteria air pollutants by reducing automobile trips and vehicle miles traveled, as specified. The bill would repeal the 82.5% and 17.5% allocation requirements for the amount continuously appropriated to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection for the healthy forest and fire prevention programs and projects and the completion of the prescribed fire and other fuel reduction programs, respectively. Existing law establishes the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program to fund transformative capital improvements that will modernize California's intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems and bus and ferry transit systems to achieve certain policy objectives. Existing law creates the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and improve mobility. This bill would authorize the Department of Transportation to provide administrative support for those 2 programs. This bill would make various cross-reference and other nonsubstantive changes. Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations. Existing law requires the PUC to require those electrical corporations with 250,000 or more customer accounts in the state, and those gas corporations with 400,000 or more customer accounts in the state, to fund as part of their energy efficiency portfolios the joint School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program, which consists of the School Reopening Ventilation and Energy Efficiency Verification and Repair Program (SRVEVR Program) and the School Noncompliant Plumbing Fixture and Appliance Program (SNPFA Program) . Existing law requires that the School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program be a joint program among all the participating utilities, be consistent across the utility territories, and be designed, administered, and implemented by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) as the program administrator. The Energy Commission administratively established the School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program Fund and existing law continuously appropriates moneys in the fund to the Energy Commission for purposes of the program. Existing law requires all allocated funds to be spent or returned to each electrical corporation or gas corporation by December 1, 2026. This bill would extend the operation of the School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program to January 1, 2031. The bill would instead require all non-committed funds to be spent or returned to each utility by December 1, 2026. The bill would require any funds committed as of August 31, 2026, to be encumbered by December 1, 2028, liquidated by December 1, 2029, and returned to each utility by January 30, 2030. By extending the term of a continuous appropriation, the bill would make an appropriation. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 39719.3 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 1608 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1608 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 75230 of the Public Resources Code proposed by SB 741 to be operative only if this bill and SB 741 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of Bill AB 193, one line has been added, while one line has been removed. This change seems to streamline the information presented in the bill, likely making it clearer and easier to follow. Simplifying the text can help ensure that all stakeholders understand the content, which is important for effective governance and informed public discussion.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | Version:
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  2. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 31).

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F. R.

  4. Referred to Com. on B. & F. R.

  5. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 759.)

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 643.)

  9. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Withdrawn from committee.

  11. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee February 8.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 22 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 13000
Republican 0500
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 11000
Republican 0400
Unaffiliated 2100
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Ochoa Bogh — Nay
Pérez — Yea
Weber Pierson — Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cabaldon, Christopher Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
McNerney, Jerry Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Richardson, Laura Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 53 Yea · 17 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 52007
Unaffiliated 1001
Republican 01702
Total 5317010
% of votes cast 66%21%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Ávila Farías — Yea
Essayli — Not Voting
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Ahrens, Patrick Democratic Not Voting
Alvarez, David Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Caloza, Jessica Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Elhawary, Sade Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
González, Mark Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Harabedian, John Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Krell, Maggy Democratic Not Voting
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Not Voting
Patel, Darshana R. Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Ransom, Rhodesia Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Celeste Democratic Yea
Rodriguez, Michelle Democratic Yea
Rogers, Chris Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Schultz, Nick Democratic Yea
Sharp-Collins, LaShae Democratic Yea
Solache, Jr., José Luis Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Stefani, Catherine Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Castillo, Leticia Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
DeMaio, Carl Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Ellis, Stan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Gonzalez, Jeff Republican Nay
Hadwick, Heather Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Macedo, Alexandra Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Tangipa, David J. Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 193 do?
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt regulations for greenhouse gas emissions limits and emissions reduction measures to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, as provided. The act authorizes that state board to include in those regulations the use of a market-based compliance mechanism to comply with those regulations. Existing law requires moneys collected by the state board from the auction or sale of allowances as part of a market-based compliance mechanism to be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Existing law allocates moneys in the fund in a specified priority and continuously appropriates a certain amount of moneys in the fund for certain purposes. This bill would require interest income earned on those moneys to be deposited into the fund. By depositing additional moneys into a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires that moneys in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund be allocated based on 4 priority levels with the first priority level being certain amounts, including amounts to replace revenues generated by the State Responsibility Area fire prevention fee, the 2nd priority level being certain amounts, including $1,000,000,000 that is continuously appropriated to the High-Speed Rail Authority for certain purposes, the 3rd priority level being certain amounts, including $800,000,000 that is continuously appropriated to the Strategic Growth Council for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program and $200,000,000 that is continuously appropriated to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection with 82.5% of that amount for health forest and fire prevention programs and projects and 17.5% of that amount for the completion of prescribed fire and other fuel reduction projects, as provided, and the 4th priority level being any amount not needed to fully fund the first 3 priority levels being available for appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would include in the first priority level for allocation from the fund any state operation costs, as proposed by the Department of Finance, appropriated in the annual Budget Act or other statute and certain administrative costs. The bill would authorize the use of moneys continuously appropriated to the High-Speed Rail Authority under the 2nd priority level for state operations costs for the High-Speed Rail Authority. The bill would instead specify the allocations of $800,000,000 continuously appropriated for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, with $560,000,000 continuously appropriated to the Housing Development and Finance Committee for affordable rental or owner-occupied housing projects, thereby making an appropriation, and $240,000,000 continuously appropriated to the Strategic Growth Council for, among other things, projects or programs designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other criteria air pollutants by reducing automobile trips and vehicle miles traveled, as specified. The bill would repeal the 82.5% and 17.5% allocation requirements for the amount continuously appropriated to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection for the healthy forest and fire prevention programs and projects and the completion of the prescribed fire and other fuel reduction programs, respectively. Existing law establishes the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program to fund transformative capital improvements that will modernize California's intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems and bus and ferry transit systems to achieve certain policy objectives. Existing law creates the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and improve mobility. This bill would authorize the Department of Transportation to provide administrative support for those 2 programs. This bill would make various cross-reference and other nonsubstantive changes. Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations. Existing law requires the PUC to require those electrical corporations with 250,000 or more customer accounts in the state, and those gas corporations with 400,000 or more customer accounts in the state, to fund as part of their energy efficiency portfolios the joint School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program, which consists of the School Reopening Ventilation and Energy Efficiency Verification and Repair Program (SRVEVR Program) and the School Noncompliant Plumbing Fixture and Appliance Program (SNPFA Program) . Existing law requires that the School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program be a joint program among all the participating utilities, be consistent across the utility territories, and be designed, administered, and implemented by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) as the program administrator. The Energy Commission administratively established the School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program Fund and existing law continuously appropriates moneys in the fund to the Energy Commission for purposes of the program. Existing law requires all allocated funds to be spent or returned to each electrical corporation or gas corporation by December 1, 2026. This bill would extend the operation of the School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program to January 1, 2031. The bill would instead require all non-committed funds to be spent or returned to each utility by December 1, 2026. The bill would require any funds committed as of August 31, 2026, to be encumbered by December 1, 2028, liquidated by December 1, 2029, and returned to each utility by January 30, 2030. By extending the term of a continuous appropriation, the bill would make an appropriation. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 39719.3 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by AB 1608 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1608 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 75230 of the Public Resources Code proposed by SB 741 to be operative only if this bill and SB 741 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 193?
AB 193 is sponsored by Gabriel, Jesse (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 193?
This bill has been introduced in the Assembly. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track AB 193?
Track AB 193 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 193

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 193

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →