District of Columbia Council Period 24 Status: Enacted

B 24-0256 — Non-Compete Conflict of Interest Clarification Amendment Act of 2021

Last action — Law L24-0175, Effective from Sep 21, 2022 Published in DC Register Vol 69 and Page 011945

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Council
  4. ✓
    To Executive
  5. 5
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 21, 2021. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

335 added · 349 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments made to Bill B 24-0256 clarify several important points about non-compete agreements in the workplace. Firstly, they specify which parts of employment policies can legally avoid being classified as non-compete provisions. Additionally, the bill now allows some exceptions for high-earning employees, such as medical specialists, under certain circumstances. These changes are significant as they help ensure both employee mobility and protection of employer interests while setting clear boundaries on the use of non-compete clauses.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL A BILL 3 24-256 5 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 7 ______________________ 9 To amend the Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 to clarify which provisions in workplace policies or employment agreements will not violate the law’s restrictions on the use of non-compete provisions and agreements;
ENROLLED ORIGINAL AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________ To amend the Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 to clarify which provisions in workplace policies or employment agreements will not violate the law’s restrictions on the use of non-compete provisions and agreements, clarify that employers may bar an employee’s use, in addition to the disclosure, of confidential and proprietary information during or after the employee’s employment for the employer, create a limited exception allowing the use of non-compete provisions with highly-compensated employees, including medical specialists, under specified circumstances, specify what must be contained in a non-compete agreement for it to be valid and enforceable, clarify remedies for violations of the act, clarify how the act relates to a collective bargaining agreement, clarify how the law applies relative to other District laws, and to clarify rulemaking requirements.
to clarify that employers may bar an employee’s use, in addition to the disclosure, of confidential and proprietary information during or after the employee’s employment for the employer;
to create a limited exception allowing the use of non-compete provisions with highly- compensated employees, including medical specialists, under specified circumstances;
to specify what must be contained in a non-compete agreement for it to be valid and enforceable;
to clarify remedies for violations of the act;
to clarify how the Act relates to a collective bargaining agreement;
to clarify how the law applies relative to other District laws;
and to clarify rulemaking requirements.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(1) “An Act” means An Act To provide for the payment and collection of wages in the District of Columbia, approved August 3, 1956 (70 Stat.
“(1) “An Act” means An Act To provide for the payment and collection of wages in the District of Columbia, approved August 3, 1956 (70 Stat.
Official Code § 32- 1301 et seq.).
Official Code § 32- et seq.).
“(2) “Broadcast employee” means an employee, other than a sales representative, of a legal entity that owns or operates one or more of the following:
“(2) “Broadcast employee” means an on- or off-air creator (such as an anchor, disc jockey, editor, producer, program host, reporter, or writer) of a legal entity that owns or operates one or more of the following:
“(A) Television stations or networks;
“(A) A television station or network;
“(B) Radio stations or networks;
“(B) A radio station or network;
“(C) Cable stations or networks;
“(C) A cable station or network;
or “(E) Any other entity that provides broadcasting services such as news, weather, traffic, sports, or entertainment programming.
or ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(E) Any other entity that provides broadcasting services such as news, weather, traffic, sports, or entertainment programming.
“(v) Overtime premiums;;
“(v) Overtime premiums;
and “(vi) Vested stock, including restricted stock units.;
“(vi) Vested stock, including restricted stock units;
and ENGROSSED ORIGINAL (vii) Other payments provided on a regular or irregular basis.
and “(vii) Other payments provided on a regular or irregular basis.
“(4) “Confidential employer information” means information owned or possessed by the employer which is not available to the general public and which the employer has taken reasonable steps to ensure is protected from improper disclosure.
“(4) “Confidential employer information” means information owned or possessed by the employer that is not available to the general public and that the employer has taken reasonable steps to ensure is protected from improper disclosure.
“(i) The employee spends more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District;
“(i) Spends more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District;
or “(B) If the employee has not yet commenced work for the employer:
or “(B) If not yet commenced work for the employer:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(i) The employer reasonably anticipates that the employee will spend more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District;
“(i) Has an employer that reasonably anticipates that the employee will spend more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District;
or "(ii) An individual to whom the employer has made an offer of employment and whom an employer reasonably anticipates will perform work for pay on behalf of the employer in the District.
or ENROLLED ORIGINAL "(ii) An individual to whom the employer has made an offer of employment and whom an employer reasonably anticipates will perform work for pay on behalf of the employer in the District.
“(B) Does not mean:
“(B) The term does not mean:
“(i) An individual employed as a casual babysitter, in or about the residence of the employer;
“(i) An individual employed as a casual babysitter in or about the residence of the employer;
“(8) “Employer” means an individual, partnership, general contractor, subcontractor, association, corporation, or business trust operating in the District, or any person or group of persons acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer operating in the ENGROSSED ORIGINAL District in relation to an employee, including a prospective employer, but does not mean the District government or the United States government “(9) “Higher education institution” means a postsecondary educational institution accredited by an agency that the United States Department of Education recognizes as an accrediting agency.
“(8) “Employer” means an individual, partnership, general contractor, subcontractor, association, corporation, or business trust operating in the District, or any person or group of persons acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer operating in the District in relation to an employee, including a prospective employer.
“(10) “Highly compensated employee” means an employee, other than a broadcast employee:
The term does not mean the District government or the United States government “(9) “Higher education institution” means a postsecondary educational institution accredited by an agency that the United States Department of Education recognizes as an accrediting agency.
“(A) Who is reasonably expected to earn from the employer, in a consecutive 12-month period, compensation greater than or equal to the minimum qualifying annual compensation;
“(10) “Highly compensated employee” means, other than a broadcast employee, an employee:
“(A) Who is reasonably expected to earn from the employer in a consecutive 12-month period compensation greater than or equal to the minimum qualifying annual compensation;
(__) “Long term incentimeans bonuses, equity compensation, stock options, restricted and unrestricted stock shares or units, performance stock shares or units, phantom stock shares, stock appreciation rights and other performance driven incentives for individual or corporate achievements typically earned over more than one year.
“(11) “Long-term incentive” means bonuses, equity compensation, stock options, restricted and unrestricted stock shares or units, performance stock shares or units, phantom stock shares, stock appreciation rights, and other performance driven incentives for individual or corporate achievements typically earned over more than one year.
“(11) “Medical specialist” means a highly compensated employee engaged primarily in the delivery of medical services, who:
“(12) “Medical specialist” means a highly compensated employee who is engaged primarily in the delivery of medical services and who:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(B) Is a physician;;
“(B) Is a physician;
and “(C) Has completed a medical residency.;
“(C) Has completed a medical residency;
and (D) Receives total compensation in the amount equal to or greater than $250,000.
and “(D) Receives total compensation in the amount equal to or greater than $ 250,000.
“(12) “Minimum qualifying annual compensation” means:
“(13) “Minimum qualifying annual compensation” means:
“(A) Beginning with the calendar year in which this title becomes applicable, $250,000.
“(A) Beginning with the calendar year in which this title becomes applicable:
(A) Beginning with the calendar year in which this title becomes applicable:
“(i) $150,000;
(i) $150,000 or (ii) $250,000 if the employee is a medical specialist.
or “(ii) $250,000, if the employee is a medical specialist.
“(B) For the calendar year beginning January 1, 2024, and each calendar year thereafter, an amount equal to the previous calendar year’s minimum qualifying annual compensation, increased in proportion to the annual average increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor for the previous calendar year adjusted to the nearest whole dollar.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(B) For the calendar year beginning January 1, 2024, and each calendar year thereafter, an amount equal to the previous calendar year’s minimum qualifying annual compensation, increased in proportion to the annual average increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor for the previous calendar year adjusted to the nearest whole dollar.
“(13) “Non-compete agreement” means a contract between an employer and employee that has one or more non-compete provisions.
“(14) “Non-compete agreement” means a contract between an employer and employee that has one or more non-compete provisions.
Show all 73 changed rows (33 more)
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(14) “Non-compete provision” means a provision in a written agreement or a workplace policy that prohibits an employee from performing work for another for pay or from operating the employee’s own business.
“(15) “Non-compete provision” means a provision in a written agreement or a workplace policy that prohibits an employee from performing work for another for pay or from operating the employee’s own business.
or;
or ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(IV) Impair the employer’s ability to comply with District or federal laws or regulations;
or “(IV) Impair the employer’s ability to comply with District or federal laws or regulations;
or a grant agreement.;
or a grant agreement;
or” (C) That provides a long term incentive.
or “(C) That provides a long-term incentive.
“(15) “Proprietary employer information” means information unique to an employer that is compiled, created, or solicited by the employer, including customer lists, client lists, and trade secrets as that term is defined in section 2(4) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1988, effective March 16, 1989 (D.C.
“(16) “Proprietary employer information” means information unique to an employer that is compiled, created, or solicited by the employer, including customer lists, client lists, and trade secrets as that term is defined in section 2(4) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1988, effective March 16, 1989 (D.C.
“(16) “Retaliate” means to take an adverse action, including a threat, verbal warning, written warning, reduction of work hours, suspension, or termination against one or more employees.
“(17) “Retaliate” means to take an adverse action, including a threat, verbal warning, written warning, reduction of work hours, suspension, or termination against one or more employees.
“(17) “Term of non-competition” means the period of time specified in a non- compete provision during which the employee’s work for a person other than the employer is prohibited.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(18) “Term of non-competition” means the period of time specified in a non- compete provision during which the employee’s work for a person other than the employer is prohibited.
“(18) “Workplace policy” means the rules and restrictions, whether written or as a matter of practice, implemented by an employer to govern the conduct of the employer’s employees.
“(19) “Workplace policy” means the rules and restrictions, whether written or as a matter of practice, implemented by an employer to govern the conduct of the employer’s employees.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(2) A non-compete provision that violates paragraph (1) of this subsection contained in an agreement between a covered employee and an employer that was entered into on or after October 1, 2022 shall be void as a matter of law and unenforceable.
“(2) A non-compete provision that violates paragraph (1) of this subsection contained in an agreement between a covered employee and an employer that was entered into on or after October 1, 2022, shall be void as a matter of law and unenforceable.
“(3) Asking, informing, or complaining about the existence, applicability, or validity of a provision in a workplace policy or employment agreement that the employee reasonably believes is prohibited under subsection (a) of this section, or making a request for a copy of such a provision, to any of the following:
“(3) Asking, informing, or complaining about the existence, applicability, or validity of a provision in a workplace policy or employment agreement that the employee reasonably believes is prohibited under subsection (a) of this section or making a request for a copy of such a provision to:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(a) For a non-compete agreement between an employer and a highly compensated employee executed on or after October 1, 2022 to be valid and enforceable::
“(a) For a non-compete agreement between an employer and a highly compensated employee executed on or after October 1, 2022, to be valid and enforceable:
“(A) The functional scope of the competitive restriction including what services, roles, industry, or competing entities the employee is restricted from performing work in or on behalf of;
“(A) The functional scope of the competitive restriction, including what services, roles, industry, or competing entities the employee is restricted from performing work in or on behalf of;
or (ii) If the employee is a medical specialist, a term of non- competition that does not exceed 730 calendar days from the date the employee separates from employment with the employer;
or ENROLLED ORIGINAL (ii) If the employee is a medical specialist, a term of non- competition that does not exceed 730 calendar days from the date the employee separates from employment with the employer;
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(b)(1) No employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against a highly compensated employee who has executed a non-compete agreement with the employer for asking for a copy of a proposed non-compete provision or non-compete agreement, or for a copy of a non-compete provision or non-compete agreement that the employee executed;
“(b)(1) No employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against a highly compensated employee who has executed a non-compete agreement with the employer for asking for a copy of a proposed non-compete provision or non-compete agreement or for a copy of a non-compete provision or non-compete agreement that the employee executed;
(A) Asking the employer for the information required to be provided to the employee pursuant to section 103a;
“(A) Asking the employer for the information required to be provided to the employee pursuant to section 103a;
or (B) Asking about or objecting to a proposed non-compete provision or agreement because the employee reasonably believes that the provision or agreement does not conform to the requirements of subsection (a)(1) of this section, or reasonably believes that the employer has failed to comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this section, to any of the following:
or (B) Asking about or objecting to a proposed non-compete provision or agreement because the employee reasonably believes that the provision or agreement does not conform to the requirements of subsection (a)(1) of this section or reasonably believes that the employer has failed to comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this section to:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(a) An employer with a workplace policy that includes one or more of the exceptions to the definition of “non-compete provision” detailed in section 101(14) shall provide a written copy of such provisions to an employee:
“(a) An employer with a workplace policy that includes one or more of the exceptions to the definition of non-compete provision, as detailed in section 101(15), shall provide a written copy of the provisions to an employee:
““The District of Columbia Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 limits the use of non-compete agreements.
““The District’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 limits the use of non-compete agreements.
It allows employers to request non-compete agreements from “highly compensated employees” under certain conditions.
It allows employers to request non-compete agreements from highly compensated employees, as that term is defined in the Ban on Non- Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020, under certain conditions.
[Name of employer] has determined that you are a highly compensated employee.
[Name of employer] ENROLLED ORIGINAL has determined that you are a highly compensated employee.
“(a)(1) The Mayor and Attorney General for the District of Columbia (“Attorney General”) shall administer and enforce this title consistent with their respective powers and rights under section 6(a), (a-1), (b), and (c) of An Act.
“(a)(1) The Mayor and Attorney General shall administer and enforce this title consistent with their respective powers and rights under section 6(a), (a-1), (b), and (c) of An Act.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(2)(A) Any records an employer maintains pursuant to the requirements of regulations issued to implement this title shall be open and made available for inspection or transcription by the Mayor, the Mayor’s authorized representative, or the Office of the Attorney General upon demand at any reasonable time.
“(2)(A) Any records an employer maintains pursuant to the requirements of regulations issued to implement this title shall be open and made available for inspection or transcription by the Mayor, the Mayor’s authorized representative, or the Office of the Attorney General upon demand at any reasonable time.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(A) An administrative complaint with the Mayor setting forth facts minimally sufficient to allege a violation of this title;
“(A) An administrative complaint with the Mayor setting forth facts minimally sufficient to allege a violation of this title;
In such action, a plaintiff shall carry the burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence.
In such action, the plaintiff shall carry the burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence.
“(2)(A)(i) The procedures set forth in section 8a(c) through (m) of An Act, shall govern the conciliation, resolution, and enforcement of an administrative complaint filed pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection;
“(2)(A)(i) The procedures set forth in section 8a(c) through (m) of An Act shall govern the conciliation, resolution, and enforcement of an administrative complaint filed pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection;
“(d) Upon investigation by the Mayor pursuant to subsection (a) of this section or in an action to enforce this title pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, in addition to administrative penalties authorized pursuant to this section, an employer found to have violated section 102, 103, or 103a shall be liable for relief payable to an employee as follows:
“(d) Upon investigation by the Mayor pursuant to subsection (a) of this section or in an action to enforce this title pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, in addition to administrative ENROLLED ORIGINAL penalties authorized pursuant to this section, an employer found to have violated section 102, 103, or 103a shall be liable for relief payable to an employee as follows:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(B) For any subsequent violation of section 102(a)(1), an employer that has been found liable pursuant to subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall be liable for relief in an amount not less than $3,000 to each affected employee.
“(B) For any subsequent violation of section 102(a)(1), an employer that has been found liable pursuant to subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall be liable for relief in an amount not less than $3,000 to each affected employee.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “Nothing in this title shall be interpreted as superseding the terms of a valid collective bargaining agreement.
“Nothing in this title shall be interpreted as superseding the terms of a valid collective bargaining agreement.
The rights, remedies, and prohibitions accorded by the provisions of this title are in addition to and cumulative of any right, remedy, or prohibition accorded by the common law, federal law, or any District statute, and nothing contained herein shall be construed to deny, abrogate, or impair any such common law or statutory right, remedy, or prohibition.
The rights, remedies, and prohibitions accorded by the provisions of this title are in addition to and cumulative of any right, remedy, or prohibition accorded by the common law, federal law, or any District statute, and nothing contained in this title shall be construed to deny, abrogate, or impair any such common law or statutory right, remedy, or prohibition.
“Sec.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “Sec.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat.
17
______________________________ Chairman Council of the District of Columbia _________________________________ Mayor District of Columbia 9
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Law L24-0175, Effective from Sep 21, 2022 Published in DC Register Vol 69 and Page 011945

  2. Transmitted to Congress

  3. Act A24-0526 Published in DC Register Vol 69 and Page 009910

  4. Returned from Mayor

  5. Signed by the Mayor and Enacted with Act Number A24-0526

  6. Transmitted to Mayor, Response Due on Aug 04, 2022

  7. Amendment (Mendelson)

  8. Final Reading

  9. First Reading

  10. Amendment (Pinto)

  11. Amendment (Silverman) - Not Considered

  12. Committee Report Filed, Includes Hearing Record

  13. Committee Mark-up of B24-0256

  14. Mark-up on B24-0256

  15. Notice of Mark-up filed in the Office of Secretary

  16. Public Hearing on B24-0256 View Public Hearing Record

  17. Public Hearing on B24-0256

  18. Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary

  19. Notice of Public Hearing Published in the District of Columbia Register

  20. Referred to Committee on Labor and Workforce Development

  21. Notice of Intent to Act on B24-0256 Published in the District of Columbia Register

  22. B24-0256 Introduced by Councilmember Silverman at Office of the Secretary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on · 4 voted No

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Reading

Passed 11 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11101
Total 11101
% of votes cast 85%8%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Nay
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Not Voting
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

Amendment (Mendelson)

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Not Voting
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

First Reading

Passed 11 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11101
Total 11101
% of votes cast 85%8%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Nay
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Not Voting
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

Amendment (Pinto)

Passed 7 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7501
Total 7501
% of votes cast 54%38%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Nay
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Nay
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Nay
Janeese Lewis George — Nay
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Not Voting
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Nay
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors B 24-0256?
B 24-0256 is sponsored by Elissa Silverman.
What is the current status of B 24-0256?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 21, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track B 24-0256?
Track B 24-0256 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on B 24-0256

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of B 24-0256

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →