B 24-0256 — Non-Compete Conflict of Interest Clarification Amendment Act of 2021
Last action — Law L24-0175, Effective from Sep 21, 2022 Published in DC Register Vol 69 and Page 011945
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Council
-
✓To Executive
-
5Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 21, 2021. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
335 added · 349 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments made to Bill B 24-0256 clarify several important points about non-compete agreements in the workplace. Firstly, they specify which parts of employment policies can legally avoid being classified as non-compete provisions. Additionally, the bill now allows some exceptions for high-earning employees, such as medical specialists, under certain circumstances. These changes are significant as they help ensure both employee mobility and protection of employer interests while setting clear boundaries on the use of non-compete clauses.
ENGROSSEDENROLLED ORIGINAL AAN BILLACT 3 24-256 5 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 7 ______________________ 9 To amend the Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 to clarify which provisions in workplace policies or employment agreements will not violate the law’s restrictions on the use of non-compete provisions and agreements;agreements, clarify that employers may bar an employee’s use, in addition to the disclosure, of confidential and proprietary information during or after the employee’s employment for the employer, create a limited exception allowing the use of non-compete provisions with highly-compensated employees, including medical specialists, under specified circumstances, specify what must be contained in a non-compete agreement for it to be valid and enforceable, clarify remedies for violations of the act, clarify how the act relates to a collective bargaining agreement, clarify how the law applies relative to other District laws, and to clarify rulemaking requirements.
to clarify that employers may bar an employee’s use, in addition to the disclosure, of confidential and proprietary information during or after the employee’s employment for the employer;
to create a limited exception allowing the use of non-compete provisions with highly- compensated employees, including medical specialists, under specified circumstances;
to specify what must be contained in a non-compete agreement for it to be valid and enforceable;
to clarify remedies for violations of the act;
to clarify how the Act relates to a collective bargaining agreement;
to clarify how the law applies relative to other District laws;
and to clarify rulemaking requirements.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(1) “An Act” means An Act To provide for the payment and collection of wages in the District of Columbia, approved August 3, 1956 (70 Stat.
Official Code § 32- 1301 et seq.).
“(2) “Broadcast employee” means an employee,on- otheror thanoff-air acreator sales(such representative,as an anchor, disc jockey, editor, producer, program host, reporter, or writer) of a legal entity that owns or operates one or more of the following:
“(A) TelevisionA stationstelevision station or networks;network;
“(B) RadioA stationsradio station or networks;network;
“(C) CableA stationscable station or networks;network;
or ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(E) Any other entity that provides broadcasting services such as news, weather, traffic, sports, or entertainment programming.
“(v) Overtime premiums;;premiums;
and “(vi) Vested stock, including restricted stock units.;units;
and ENGROSSED“(vii) ORIGINAL (vii) Other payments provided on a regular or irregular basis.
“(4) “Confidential employer information” means information owned or possessed by the employer whichthat is not available to the general public and whichthat the employer has taken reasonable steps to ensure is protected from improper disclosure.
“(i) TheSpends employee spends more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District;
or “(B) If the employee has not yet commenced work for the employer:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(i) TheHas an employer that reasonably anticipates that the employee will spend more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District;
or ENROLLED ORIGINAL "(ii) An individual to whom the employer has made an offer of employment and whom an employer reasonably anticipates will perform work for pay on behalf of the employer in the District.
“(B) DoesThe term does not mean:
“(i) An individual employed as a casual babysitter,babysitter in or about the residence of the employer;
“(8) “Employer” means an individual, partnership, general contractor, subcontractor, association, corporation, or business trust operating in the District, or any person or group of persons acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer operating in the ENGROSSED ORIGINAL District in relation to an employee, including a prospective employer,employer. but does not mean the District government or the United States government “(9) “Higher education institution” means a postsecondary educational institution accredited by an agency that the United States Department of Education recognizes as an accrediting agency.
“(10)The “Highlyterm compensateddoes employee”not mean the District government or the United States government “(9) “Higher education institution” means a postsecondary educational institution accredited by an employee,agency otherthat thanthe aUnited broadcastStates employee:Department of Education recognizes as an accrediting agency.
“(A)“(10) Who“Highly iscompensated reasonablyemployee” expectedmeans, toother earnthan from the employer, in a consecutivebroadcast 12-monthemployee, period,an compensationemployee: greater than or equal to the minimum qualifying annual compensation;
“(A) Who is reasonably expected to earn from the employer in a consecutive 12-month period compensation greater than or equal to the minimum qualifying annual compensation;
(__)“(11) “Long“Long-term termincentive” incentimeansmeans bonuses, equity compensation, stock options, restricted and unrestricted stock shares or units, performance stock shares or units, phantom stock shares, stock appreciation rightsrights, and other performance driven incentives for individual or corporate achievements typically earned over more than one year.
“(11)“(12) “Medical specialist” means a highly compensated employee who is engaged primarily in the delivery of medical services,services and who:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(B) Is a physician;;physician;
and “(C) Has completed a medical residency.;residency;
and (D)“(D) Receives total compensation in the amount equal to or greater than $250,000.$ 250,000.
“(12)“(13) “Minimum qualifying annual compensation” means:
“(A) Beginning with the calendar year in which this title becomes applicable,applicable: $250,000.
(A)“(i) Beginning$150,000; with the calendar year in which this title becomes applicable:
(i) $150,000 or (ii)“(ii) $250,000$250,000, if the employee is a medical specialist.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(B) For the calendar year beginning January 1, 2024, and each calendar year thereafter, an amount equal to the previous calendar year’s minimum qualifying annual compensation, increased in proportion to the annual average increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor for the previous calendar year adjusted to the nearest whole dollar.
“(13)“(14) “Non-compete agreement” means a contract between an employer and employee that has one or more non-compete provisions.
Show all 73 changed lines (33 more)
ENGROSSED“(15) ORIGINAL “(14) “Non-compete provision” means a provision in a written agreement or a workplace policy that prohibits an employee from performing work for another for pay or from operating the employee’s own business.
or;
or ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(IV) Impair the employer’s ability to comply with District or federal laws or regulations;
or a grant agreement.;agreement;
or”or (C)“(C) That provides a longlong-term term incentive.
“(15)“(16) “Proprietary employer information” means information unique to an employer that is compiled, created, or solicited by the employer, including customer lists, client lists, and trade secrets as that term is defined in section 2(4) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1988, effective March 16, 1989 (D.C.
“(16)“(17) “Retaliate” means to take an adverse action, including a threat, verbal warning, written warning, reduction of work hours, suspension, or termination against one or more employees.
“(17)ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(18) “Term of non-competition” means the period of time specified in a non- compete provision during which the employee’s work for a person other than the employer is prohibited.
“(18)“(19) “Workplace policy” means the rules and restrictions, whether written or as a matter of practice, implemented by an employer to govern the conduct of the employer’s employees.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(2) A non-compete provision that violates paragraph (1) of this subsection contained in an agreement between a covered employee and an employer that was entered into on or after October 1, 20222022, shall be void as a matter of law and unenforceable.
“(3) Asking, informing, or complaining about the existence, applicability, or validity of a provision in a workplace policy or employment agreement that the employee reasonably believes is prohibited under subsection (a) of this section,section or making a request for a copy of such a provision,provision toto: any of the following:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(a) For a non-compete agreement between an employer and a highly compensated employee executed on or after October 1, 20222022, to be valid and enforceable::enforceable:
“(A) The functional scope of the competitive restrictionrestriction, including what services, roles, industry, or competing entities the employee is restricted from performing work in or on behalf of;
or ENROLLED ORIGINAL (ii) If the employee is a medical specialist, a term of non- competition that does not exceed 730 calendar days from the date the employee separates from employment with the employer;
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(b)(1) No employer may retaliate or threaten to retaliate against a highly compensated employee who has executed a non-compete agreement with the employer for asking for a copy of a proposed non-compete provision or non-compete agreement,agreement or for a copy of a non-compete provision or non-compete agreement that the employee executed;
(A)“(A) Asking the employer for the information required to be provided to the employee pursuant to section 103a;
or (B) Asking about or objecting to a proposed non-compete provision or agreement because the employee reasonably believes that the provision or agreement does not conform to the requirements of subsection (a)(1) of this section,section or reasonably believes that the employer has failed to comply with the requirements of subsection (a)(2) of this section,section toto: any of the following:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(a) An employer with a workplace policy that includes one or more of the exceptions to the definition of “non-competenon-compete provision”provision, as detailed in section 101(14)101(15), shall provide a written copy of suchthe provisions to an employee:
““The DistrictDistrict’s of Columbia Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 limits the use of non-compete agreements.
It allows employers to request non-compete agreements from “highlyhighly compensated employees”employees, as that term is defined in the Ban on Non- Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020, under certain conditions.
[Name of employer] ENROLLED ORIGINAL has determined that you are a highly compensated employee.
“(a)(1) The Mayor and Attorney General for the District of Columbia (“Attorney General”) shall administer and enforce this title consistent with their respective powers and rights under section 6(a), (a-1), (b), and (c) of An Act.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(2)(A) Any records an employer maintains pursuant to the requirements of regulations issued to implement this title shall be open and made available for inspection or transcription by the Mayor, the Mayor’s authorized representative, or the Office of the Attorney General upon demand at any reasonable time.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(A) An administrative complaint with the Mayor setting forth facts minimally sufficient to allege a violation of this title;
In such action, athe plaintiff shall carry the burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence.
“(2)(A)(i) The procedures set forth in section 8a(c) through (m) of An Act,Act shall govern the conciliation, resolution, and enforcement of an administrative complaint filed pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection;
“(d) Upon investigation by the Mayor pursuant to subsection (a) of this section or in an action to enforce this title pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, in addition to administrative ENROLLED ORIGINAL penalties authorized pursuant to this section, an employer found to have violated section 102, 103, or 103a shall be liable for relief payable to an employee as follows:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(B) For any subsequent violation of section 102(a)(1), an employer that has been found liable pursuant to subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall be liable for relief in an amount not less than $3,000 to each affected employee.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “Nothing in this title shall be interpreted as superseding the terms of a valid collective bargaining agreement.
The rights, remedies, and prohibitions accorded by the provisions of this title are in addition to and cumulative of any right, remedy, or prohibition accorded by the common law, federal law, or any District statute, and nothing contained hereinin this title shall be construed to deny, abrogate, or impair any such common law or statutory right, remedy, or prohibition.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “Sec.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat.
17______________________________ Chairman Council of the District of Columbia _________________________________ Mayor District of Columbia 9
Show all 73 changed rows (33 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Enrollment Current pdf
- Engrossed Engrossment pdf
- Introduced Introduction pdf
Action History
-
Law L24-0175, Effective from Sep 21, 2022 Published in DC Register Vol 69 and Page 011945
-
Transmitted to Congress
-
Act A24-0526 Published in DC Register Vol 69 and Page 009910
-
Returned from Mayor
-
Signed by the Mayor and Enacted with Act Number A24-0526
-
Transmitted to Mayor, Response Due on Aug 04, 2022
-
Amendment (Mendelson)
-
Final Reading
-
First Reading
-
Amendment (Pinto)
-
Amendment (Silverman) - Not Considered
-
Committee Report Filed, Includes Hearing Record
-
Committee Mark-up of B24-0256
-
Mark-up on B24-0256
-
Notice of Mark-up filed in the Office of Secretary
-
Public Hearing on B24-0256 View Public Hearing Record
-
Public Hearing on B24-0256
-
Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary
-
Notice of Public Hearing Published in the District of Columbia Register
-
Referred to Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
-
Notice of Intent to Act on B24-0256 Published in the District of Columbia Register
-
B24-0256 Introduced by Councilmember Silverman at Office of the Secretary
Sponsors
- Elissa Silverman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on · 4 voted No
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 8% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Yea |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Yea |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Elissa Silverman | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Nay |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Yea |
| Mary Cheh | — | Not Voting |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Trayon White, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Vincent Gray | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Yea |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Yea |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Elissa Silverman | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Yea |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Yea |
| Mary Cheh | — | Not Voting |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Trayon White, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Vincent Gray | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 8% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Yea |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Yea |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Elissa Silverman | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Nay |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Yea |
| Mary Cheh | — | Not Voting |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Trayon White, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Vincent Gray | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 38% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Nay |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Nay |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Elissa Silverman | — | Nay |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Nay |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Yea |
| Mary Cheh | — | Not Voting |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Trayon White, Sr. | — | Yea |
| Vincent Gray | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors B 24-0256?
- B 24-0256 is sponsored by Elissa Silverman.
- What is the current status of B 24-0256?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 21, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track B 24-0256?
- Track B 24-0256 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on B 24-0256
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of B 24-0256
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →