District of Columbia Council Period 24 Status: Passed Council

B 24-0446 — Attorney General Civil Rights Enforcement Clarification Amendment Act of 2021

Last action — Final Reading, CC

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Council
  4. 4
    To Executive
  5. 5
    Enacted

This bill died with Council Period 24. It reached “Passed Council” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

230 added · 212 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill B 24-0446 clarify the Attorney General's role in addressing housing discrimination under the Human Rights Act of 1977. Specifically, it formalizes the Attorney General's authority to enforce the act and outlines the procedures for doing so. This change is important because it strengthens the enforcement of rights against discrimination in housing, helping to ensure that real estate organizations and property managers are held accountable.

→
Previous
Latest
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICTOF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, x k * AKARL A.RACINE,L — — October 15,2021 Chairman, Councilofthe DistrictofColumbia Joh.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL A BILL 3 24-446 5 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 7 ________________ 9 To amend the Human Rights Act of 1977 to clarify the role of the Attorney General in a civil action involving housing discrimination, to clarify the act’s applicability to real estate organizations and property managers, to authorize the Attorney General to enforce the act and set forth procedures governing that authority and remedies, and to make technical corrections.
WilsonBuilding Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Attorney General Civil Rights Enforcement Clarification Amendment Act of 2022”.
Suite 504 Washington, D.C.
20004 Dear Chairman Mendelson:
Iwrite totransmit the “Attorney General Civil Rights Enforcement ClarificationAmendment Act Bill would amend the Human Rights Act of 1977 (“Human Rights Act”), (D.C.
Law 2-38;
D.C.The Official Code§ 2-1401.01 etseq.), to:
© lrfyheatoityfteAtoneyeerltobigcvlatonsnerteHumanigts AtinhenamftheDsrctfCoumia;
© olsounovrandenlzedsriiatonnteDsrctofoumia;adenoreent * lrfyheapiatooftheHumaigtsAttolrelettendpoerymanagement roesoal;ad © liiateheuretpoisooflawhatlowsatesoitruptheficefHuman igt’adiitrtveroesinhuingatesinwayhtcanharndvdaltnns” neet.
heeupaeswlleterlowteOfieofheAtrnyGeerltoiiaecseofatersor rciesfvoltinsofheHumanihtsctasacomplemeoteimorantworkfhe ficefHumanihs.
Thefie ofheAtoneyGneal oksfrwrd owokigwithteConcl ndoter tkhodrstotegtenurlwssohtalidvdulsnteDsritcnlv,lan,or,and plwithoutfearofdiscriminatIfyou haveanyquestions,youme,orcontact orstfmaycntctDeputtoreyenralmiyGuntont(02)05738.
icrly, Z o Attorney General forthe DistrictofColumbia 400Sitet,N.W.,WashinC.
20001,(202)727-3400,Fax(202)730-0484 Cfairman Phil Mendelson ttereustftheAtoneyGneal ABILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
To aatin nvlvng housinsriiaton;
aiy heAc's plcaiityoreal tte ogaiztonsandrpetymanageruhoiethettrnyGenraloenoceteActon behoaltepulcineet;andmakechialcretin.
BE TENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICTOFCOLUMBIA, isatt ctmayeciedsthe“AttornnealCviligtsEnforcemearfcainAmendmentAct of2021” Sc.2.TheHuman ihsActof197,efetveDecember,1977(..
Law 38;
D.CffcalCode§-10101eteq),samendedsolos:
()Setin102(..
ffcalCode§-10102)samendedsflow:
1)A newaagaph(-A)saddedoeadsfolws:
(2A)“AttomeyGeneral”mhettrnyGeneraorheisrctofColumbia roiddforysetin20(b)ftheAtoneyenralfrteDititofColumbilriiaton andElectedTermAmended Actof2010,effectiveMay 27,2010(D.C.Law 18-160;D.C.Official Cod§ -043)”.
2) Paragraph (s amended btrkng he phrasral sate broker o salesman”d nsringthephase“ealetae roer,ral sateslepeso, orpoprty managernisplc.
4l 3)Paragraph(2samendedoreadsolow:
“(26)"Resatebrokeorelesaesalespersonorpropertymaneesto"r apersonwhosiened,underChapter28ile47,sarealsttebroker(includialar satergniato),arelesaesalespersrapropertymanager.”.
4s (b) Section 223 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1402.23) isamended as follows:
(1)Theecionilesamendedored:“Actsoisrimnaionba ealstte brokeralettesalespersrpropertymanager.”.
(2)Thexitigtetoftheetinisrenumberessubsecti).( (3)New subsecti)and(b)areaddeoreadsfollows:
“(a) Itshallbe aofthis section forany real estatebroker, real estatesalesperson, orpropertymanager tocommit any actofdiscriminationt.ohibitedby thisa “b)A findingbyortthtaholderofrapplicaoranyprit,lcns,frncie, benefit,exemption, oradvantage issuedby oronbehalfof aDistrictgovernment body hasviolated this section shall, in any proceeding conducted by thatbody thatconsiders whether the holderor applicantisactinginthepublic interest,constituteprima facieevidence thattheholderorapplicant hsendangerehepblcinees..
(c)Section 305 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1403.05) isamended by repealing subsections (f) andg.
()Secion307(D..
OfiilCode §2-10307)isameded b stiin tephrae “CrpratonCousel whrevr iapear an isetigth prae “ttrme Geerl”init pac.
()Setio315(D..OffcalCod §2-40.15 iamenedasfolos:
()Stik tephas “orpraionConse sal”an isettephrse“Ofieof thAttome Gnerlmay”inispac.
()Subecton(bisamededbystrkngtephrse“ th evntthtsucesfl ciiproeeing dnotreutisecrinsuchcmpiane,thCorortioCounelshllisiut crmialacin.
C) ()Setin316(DC.OficalCoe §2-40.1) iamededbystrkngtephae “pivtecuse adinsrinthewod “aue”inispac.
n (gA newsetin318iadde trea afolow:
n “Sc.31.
Show all 190 changed rows (150 more)
Previous
Latest
CncuretAutoriyofthAttrne Gneal B “()Inaditont ay ohe rmeiesdecrbedi ti atifth AtoneyGeera hs resontbelev ta ayperonisvoatngthproison othsac,teAttrneGenealmay brngaivlactoni tenameofteDitic.
“()A cvlaciopuruantothssetinmaybebrogh aanytie () f eso s oun o ave omitte ny ctin r rctc ae nlawul ndr “ I ap if t h c a a o p m u u thsat teAtoreyGeera my otanciipenlie.Ciipenltesasese ude tisecio shl b acodintoth fllwigschdue:
“()In a amuntnottoexced $0,00 pr voltonifth prso ha nt pevousybeenajudedtohaecommttedayunlafuldscimnaoryratie;
“(2) I an amount nt toexceed $25,000per volatin ifth personhas,duringthe 5-year periodending on the dat of the flin of thecause of acion, been ajudged to have co mmittedone otherunlawfuldiscrimiatorypractce;an d “3) Inan amount nt toexceed $50,000per volatio ithe personhas,duringthe 7year periodending on the dat of the flingof thecause of acton, been adjudgd to have committed2o rmo reunlawful dicriminatoy prctics.
“(d)Each separte anddistict acionor praticethatvioltes aprovison oft a s t hal bedee med avioltionunder tissectin.
An acion o praticeshal contitut multple volatios i iviolaesm orethan oneprovisioofthe actorviolats te rihtsofmore than oneperso.
Each daythata dicriminatoy advertiement iposted invioltionof tisactshal be avioltion 2.
“(e)The courtma y gant anyrelif i th ciilactionthatitdeems approriate,includig th restiutin of money or propert and the reiefprovided insection 307 and313(a).
Any pealties rcovered under thi sectionshall be deosited in th Ltigaton Support Fund as esablishe by sction106boft he Atorney GeneralfortheDistrctof Columbia Carifictionand Eleced Term Amen dment Actof 2010,effetiveOctober22, 2015(D.C.
Law 21-36;D.C.
Oficil Code § 1-31.86b).
“(f)In anyactionunder ths setion theAttorney Genera shal notbe requird toprove 9) damages and anyinjuncton isued sallbe withou bond.
“(g) Actions brough pusuant to thi sectin are independent of any other acions remeies, orproceduresthatma ybe availble t anaggrieved prty pusuant tothi orany othe law A priate complanant's finl adjuicationor settlemnt shal not prelude the Attrney General from seeking any remedy on behalfofthe Districttowhich itmay be entitled.
“()()Inthecourseofanvetiatontodeterminewhethoseekeifunderhis setin,teAttorneyGeneralmay:
(A)subpoenawitnesses;
(B)administth;
(C) examine an individual under oath;
(D) require sworn answers inwritingtowritten interrogatories;
or (E) compel productiocrd, books, papeotrct, and her ML documents, verified by a swom certificateofcompletion.
(2)Servofanydocumentissuedunhssetinmaybemadebymil,-mil, ranyohermethodesoabycalultedogieacualotce;roidd,thtteSuprirCourt ofthe DistrictofColumbia could exercisejurisdiction over the recipientofthe demand document us consistent with the due process clause ofthe Constitution ofthe United States.
(3) Information or evidence obtained under thissection isnot admissible ina later criminalproceegantthepersonwho providestheinformationorevidence,exceptwith 8.
respecttosworn statementsthatarethemselves thebasisforasubsequent perjuryprosecution.
(4) Subpoenas orrequests forinterrogatories issued under thissection shallcontain thefollowing:
(A) The name ohe eron from whomestmoy issoughtr he documentsormaterialsrequested;
13, (B) The persot the Office of the Attorneyo whom het documents shallbe provided;
()Adetaileitofthepcficdocuments,books,papers,orobjectsbeing eqesed,fan;
(D)Thet,tie,andplahttheeipetisoappeaogivetestimony orproducethematepcfidunderparagr3)ofhssubsectirbth;
()A sot,lanstteentofheecpet'sihtsandheproceduref efocigandcntsinghesubpoena;and ()ThesgatreofheAttornenra,ChiefDeputyAttoenra, Deputy Attorney General, orAssistant Deputy Attorney General approving the subpoena request.
(5) Unless otherwise perhe Office of the Attorney General, only attomeys for the Office of the Attorney General and their staff, other people involved in the investigation, thewitness under examination, hisorher attorney, interpreters when needed, and, frthepurposeokngteeviece,asengrphroroertorfarecrdngdviemaybe present during oftestimony.
(©Inthecaseofsaloobeyasubpoenaissuedhsscto,theAttomey General mattin he Superior CouheisrctofColumbioran orderrequiring coplane.Anyfiureoobeyherdroftecortmayberatdbytecortasonemt.
(7)Anypersoowhom asubpoenahasbeenissuhisetinorpursuant to§28-3910maxrcsetepivlgesenjoyedlwitese.A persoowhomasubpoena hasbeensudmaymovetoquashrmodifhesubpoennheSpeiorCourtoeDitict ofColumbia on grounds including:
(A)TheAttorneyGenildtofolloraifyheprocedurtfrh inthissection forthea subpoena;
or (B)Any grounateitunderttteorcommon laorquashirgo moifingasbpen.
()InanyactiontheSuperiorCourteDitrctofColumbiapertaioangt subpoena issued under this section, the Attorney General shall be entitled torecover the costs of theaction and reasonable attomeys’ fees.
;()Subpoenasonerogtrisunderhssetinshllnotbedirecoedt aDitrctgovernmenfcilorett.
“(i)This section shallnotcreate any additional rights ordefenses forany party.
“() Within 180 daterte efctve ae ofthe torey Gneal ivl Rghs Enforcement Clarification Amendment Act of 2021, as introduced on _ _ _ _ , 2021 (Bill 24- __), the Attorney General and the Office may enter into, and may from time to time update, a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) that addresses subjects such as the two agencies’ data collection, sharing of information, confidentiality, and the Attorney General's defense and enforceofthe Office's and the Commission's decisions and orders.
No provision ofthis act, orofrules implementing thisact,shallbe construedtolimittheinformationsharingbetween the Attorney General and the Office that the M O U may authorize, but such information sharing shall 13, remainlimitedbyofietiliyrequiremennotheaw”.
2.
TheHumanRightsActof1977,effectiveDecember13,1977(D.C.Law2-38;D.C.
Official Code § 2-1401.01 et seq.), is amended as follows:
(a) Section 102 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1401.02) is amended as follows:
(1) A new paragraph (2A) is added to read as follows:
“(2A) “Attorney General” means the Attorney General for the District of Columbia.”.
(2) Paragraph (16) is amended to read as follows:
“(16) “Make public” means disclosure to the public or to the news media of any personal or business data, documents, information, records, or reports obtained during the course of a complaint filed under the provisions of this act, but shall not include:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(A) The publication of EEO-1, EEO-2, or EEO-3 reports as required by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;
“(B) The provision of any data, documents, information, records, or reports in the course of any administrative or judicial proceeding under this act or any judicial proceeding under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, approved July 2, 1964 (78 Stat.
253;
42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e et seq.), or Title VIII or IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, approved April 11, 1968 (82 Stat.81;42U.S.C§3601etseq.),involvingsuchdata,documents,information,records,orreports;
“(C) The access to such data, documents, information, records, or reports by personnel of the Office of Human Rights, members of the Commission on Human Rights, or personnel of the Attorney General pursuant to section 316a or for the Attorney General’s defense and enforcement of the Office's investigations or the Commission's decisions and orders, or parties to a proceeding before the Office, or their representatives, after the closure of the case and passage of the reconsideration period;
or “(D) The publication of aggregated data from individual reports, such that personally identifiable information is indeterminable.”.
(3) Paragraph (21) is amended by striking the phrase “real estate broker or salesman” and inserting the phrase “real estate broker, real estate salesperson, property manager,” in its place.
(4) Paragraph (26) is amended to read as follows:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(26) “Real estate broker” or “real estate salesperson” or “property manager” means a person who is licensed, under Chapter 28 of Title 47, as a real estate broker (including a real estate organization), a real estate salesperson, or a property manager.”.
(b) Section 223 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1402.23) is amended as follows:
(1) The section heading is amended by striking the phrase “by broker or salesperson” and inserting the phrase “by real estate broker, real estate salesperson, or property manager” in its place.
(2) The existing text is designated as subsection (c).
(3) New subsections (a) and (b) are added to read as follows:
“(a) It shall be a violation of this section for any real estate broker, real estate salesperson, or property manager to commit any act of discrimination prohibited by this act.
“(b) A finding by a court or the Commission that a holder of or applicant for any permit, license, franchise, benefit, exemption, oradvantage issuedbyoronbehalfof aDistrict government agency, board, or commission has violated this section shall, in any proceeding conducted by that agency, board, or commission that considers whether the holder or applicant is acting in the public interest, constitute prima facie evidence that the holder or applicant has endangered the public interest.”.
(c) Section 252 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1402.52) is amended as follows:
(1) Subsection (a) is amended by striking the phrase “6 months” and inserting the phrase “one year” in its place.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL (2) Paragraph (c) is amended to read as follows:
“(c) All persons subject to this act shall furnish to the Office, at the time and in the manner prescribed by the Office, such data, documents, information, records, and reports relating to information under their control as the Office may require.
Data, documents, information, reports, and records submitted to the Office under the provisions of this section shall not be made public, nor shall the identities of persons and properties contained in reports submitted to the Office under the provisions of this section.”.
(d) Section 305(g) (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1403.05(g)) is amended by striking the phrase “the Corporation Counsel” and inserting the phrase “the Attorney General” in its place.
(e) Section 307 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1403.07) is amended by striking the phrase “the Corporation Counsel” both times it appears and inserting the phrase “the Attorney General” in its place.
(f) Section 315 (D.C.
Office Code § 2-1403.15) is amended as follows:
(1) Subsection (a) is amended by striking the phrase “the Corporation Counsel” and inserting the phrase “the Attorney General” in its place.
(2) Subsection (b) is amended to read as follows:
“(b) When the Commission certifies a matter to the Attorney General for enforcement, the Attorney General shall, in the Attorney General’s sole discretion, assess the matter to determine whether the order has the ability to be enforced.
If the order is able to be enforced, the Attorney General shall institute, in the name of the District, civil proceedings, including the seeking of such ENGROSSED ORIGINAL restraining orders and temporary or permanent injunctions as are necessary to obtain complete compliance with the Commission’s orders.
In the event that successful civil proceedings do not result in securing such compliance, the Attorney General may institute criminal action.”.
(g) A new section 316a is added to read as follows:
“Sec.
316a.
Civil actions by the Attorney General.
“(a) In addition to any other remedies provided in this act, if the Attorney General has reason to believe that any person is violating the provisions of this act, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the name of the District.
“(b) A civil action brought pursuant to this section:
“(1) May be brought at any time;
and “(2) Shall be independent of any other actions, remedies, or procedures that may be available to an aggrieved party pursuant to this or any other law.
An aggrieved party’s final adjudication or settlement shall not preclude the Attorney General from seeking any remedy on behalf of the District to which the District may be entitled.
“(c) In a civil action brought pursuant to this section:
“(1) If a person is found to have violated this act, the Attorney General may obtain the following civil penalties:
“(A) If the person has not previously been adjudged to have committed any prior unlawful discriminatory practice or has committed at least one prior unlawful discriminatory ENGROSSED ORIGINAL practice other than in the periods provided in subparagraph (B) and (C) of this paragraph, in an amount not to exceed $10,000 per violation;
“(B) If the person has, during the 5-year period ending on the date of the filing of the cause of action, been adjudged to have committed one other unlawful discriminatory practice, in an amount not to exceed $25,000 per violation;
and “(C) If the person has, during the 7-year period ending on the date of the filing of the cause of action, been adjudged to have committed 2 or more unlawful discriminatory practices, in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per violation;
and “(2) The Attorney General shall not be required to prove damages, and any injunction issued shall be without bond.
“(d) Each separate and distinct action or practice that violates this act shall be deemed a violation under this section.
An action or practice shall constitute multiple violations if it violates more than one provision of the act or violates the rights of more than one person.
Each day that a discriminatory advertisement is posted in violation of this act shall be a violation.
“(e) The court may grant any additional relief in the civil action that it deems appropriate, including the restitution of money or property and the relief provided in sections 307 and 313(a).
“(f) Any penalties recovered pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Litigation Support Fund, as established by section 106b of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia Clarification and Elected Term Amendment Act of 2010, effective October 22, 2015 (D.C.
Law 21-36;
D.C.
Official Code § 1-301.86b).
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(g)(1) In order to determine whether to seek relief under this section, the Attorney General may:
“(A) Subpoena witnesses;
“(B) Administer oaths;
“(C) Examine an individual under oath;
“(D) Require sworn answers in writing to written interrogatories;
or “(E) Compel production of records, books, papers, contracts, and other documents, verified by a sworn certificate of completion.
“(2) Service of any document issued pursuant to this section shall be made by mail, e-mail, or any other method reasonably calculated to provide actual notice;
provided, that the Superior Court of the District of Columbia may exercise jurisdiction over the recipient of the demand document consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States.
“(3) Information or evidence obtained pursuant to this section shall not be admissible in a later criminal proceeding against the person who provides the information or evidence, except with respect to sworn statements that are the basis for a subsequent perjury prosecution.
“(4) Subpoenas or requests for interrogatories issued pursuant to this section shall contain the following:
“(A) The name of the person from whom testimony is sought or the documents or materials requested;
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(B) The person at the Office of the Attorney General to whom the documents shall be provided;
“(C) A detailed list of the specific documents, books, papers, or objects being requested, if any;
“(D) The date, time, and place that the recipient is to appear to give testimony or produce the materials specified under subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, or both;
“(E) A short, plain statement of the recipient's rights and the procedure for enforcing and contesting the subpoena;
and “(F)ThesignatureoftheAttorneyGeneral,ChiefDeputyAttorneyGeneral, Deputy Attorney General, or Assistant Deputy Attorney General approving the subpoena request.
“(5) Unless otherwise permitted by the Attorney General, only attorneys for the Office of the Attorney General and their staff, other persons they engage in the examination, the witness under examination, the witness’s attorney, interpreters when needed, and, for the purpose of taking the evidence, a stenographer or operator of a recording device, may be present during the taking of testimony.
“(6) In the case ofrefusal toobeyasubpoenaissuedunderthis section,the Attorney General may petition the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for an order requiring compliance.
Any failure to obey the order of the court may be treated by the court as contempt.
“(7) Any person to whom a subpoena has been issued under this section may exercise the privileges enjoyed by all witnesses.
A person to whom a subpoena has been issued ENGROSSED ORIGINAL may move to quash or modify the subpoena in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on grounds including:
“(A) The Attorney General failed to follow or satisfy the procedures set forth in this section for the issuance of a subpoena;
or “(B) Any grounds that exist under statute or common law for quashing or modifying a subpoena.
“(8) In any action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia pertaining to a subpoena issued under this section, the Attorney General shall be entitled to recover the costs of the action and reasonable attorneys' fees.
“(9) Subpoenas or interrogatories under this section shall not be directed to a District government official or entity.
“(h) This section shall not be construed to create any additional rights or defenses for any party.
“(i) Prior to instituting any action pursuant to this section, the Attorney General shall give notice to the Office that it intends to file such action.
Notice shall be provided at least 48 hours prior to filing the action, and the Office shall be required to keep information regarding the potential action confidential until the filing is made public.
This notice shall not constitute a jurisdictional requirement, and failure to provide the notice required by this subsection shall not create a defense in the action.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(j) Within 180 days after the effective date of the Attorney General Civil Rights Enforcement Clarification Amendment Act of 2022, as approved by the Government Operations and Facilities on November 17, 2022 (Committee print of Bill 24-446), the Attorney General and the Office may enter into, and may from time to time update, a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) that addresses subjects such as the agencies’ sharing of information and documents, notifications, and the procedures underlying the Attorney General’s defense and enforcement of the Office's and the Commission's decisions and orders.
No provision of this act, or of rules implementing this act, shall be construed to limit the information sharing between the Attorney General and the Office that the MOU may authorize, but such information sharing shall remain limited by any confidentiality requirements in any other law.” Sec.
FiscalImpact Statement.
The Attorney General Civil Rights Enforcement Second Temporary Amendment Act of 2022, passed on 2reading on November 1, 2022 (Enrolled version of Bill 24-1043), is repealed.
The Council adopts the fiscalimpact statementinthe committee report asthe fiscal impact taemntreuirdbysecion4aofteGeneraleisatvePrcedresActof195,approved October 16,2006 (120 Stat.2038;
Sec.
4.
Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat.
2038;
5.
ThisctsalltakefctfollowingapprovaheMayororinheeventofvetobhe Mayor,tonbytheCounciooverridhevto,a30-dayperiodofcongressionalrsviewa im roidednsetin60(c(1oftheDsritofColumbiaHomeueAct,aproedDecember4, 1973 (87 Stat.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of congressional review as ENGROSSED ORIGINAL provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbiagse.
Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ficeofheAttorneyGeneral x w * E a E R ! ealCouniiin MEMORANDUM TO:
11
Directorlstone OfficeofPolicy and LegislativeAffairs FROM:
BrianK,Flowers DeputyAttorneyGeneral LegalCounsiis DATE:
October 12,2021 lSufiiecyCrtfiaioofDratLeisato,the“ttoneyGnerl RE:
Cii Rghs EnfrcmetClriictonAmendentActof201” (AE21146 Th is is t o Ce rti fy t hat tioricehareviwedteaboe- reerncddratleilainandfondittbeleal uobecionbl.f yuhaveay qesios,plaedonothsiaetocllm a 74-52.
Briawk.Floweryby CPE Brian K.Flowers
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Final Reading, CC

  2. First Reading, CC

  3. Committee Report Filed

  4. Committee Mark-up of B24-0446

  5. Notice of Mark-up filed in the Office of Secretary

  6. Committee Report Filed, Includes Hearing Record

  7. Committee Mark-up of B24-0446

  8. Notice of Mark-up filed in the Office of Secretary

  9. Public Hearing on B24-0446 View Public Hearing Record

  10. Notice of Public Hearing Published in the District of Columbia Register

  11. Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary

  12. Notice of Intent to Act on B24-0446 Published in the District of Columbia Register

  13. Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, and Committee on Government Operations and Facilities

  14. B24-0446 Introduced by Chairman Mendelson at Office of the Secretary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Reading, CC

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

First Reading, CC

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors B 24-0446?
B 24-0446 is sponsored by Phil Mendelson.
What is the current status of B 24-0446?
This bill died with Council Period 24. It reached “Passed Council” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track B 24-0446?
Track B 24-0446 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on B 24-0446

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of B 24-0446

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →