District of Columbia Council Period 24 Status: Passed Council

B 24-0924 — Protecting Adjacent and Adjoining Property Owners from Construction Damage Amendment Act of 2022

Last action — Final Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Council
  4. 4
    To Executive
  5. 5
    Enacted

This bill died with Council Period 24. It reached “Passed Council” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

88 added · 95 removed

Plain-language change summary

The new amendment to the Construction Codes Approval and Amendments Act of 1986 requires property owners and contractors to provide proof of insurance that covers adjacent property owners for any potential damage caused by construction work. This change is important because it helps protect neighboring properties by ensuring they have financial recourse if damage occurs during construction. Overall, this requirement aims to enhance accountability and reduce disputes between construction crews and neighboring property owners.

→
Previous
Latest
MURIELBOWSER MAYOR Jly,2022 The Honorable Phil Mendelson Chairman, Councilofthe DistrictofColumbia JohnA.WilsonBuilding Washington, DC 20004enue, NW, Suite 504 Dear Chairman Mendelson:
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL A BILL 3 24-924 5 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 7 9 To amend section 6a of the Construction Codes Approval and Amendments Act of 1986 to require property owners, contractors, or persons applying for specific permits for construction work to demonstrate that his or her insurance will insure adjacent property owners for loss or damage that arises out of the proposed construction work.
EclsedfrcnsdeaionadenatmntbyteConclofteDititofColumbisail Amendment Actof 2022.”jonigPrpetyOwnersrmContrcionDamage Tislgsltonilleqieprpetyones,cnratrs,rpesosaplyngfrapemitor constructionoobtaiaiiyinsuranoinueadjacentandadjoiningpropertyowners frlssordamagriigouoftheproposedwourety,Dsritlaweuiesgneal laiiyinuanebeoreheymaybesuedaicne.WhileeDstitofColumbiuldng Code requires contractors and building owners totake certain precautions toprevent damage to ajonngbilinsduingontucionandmoito,threaenoeisigreuiemntso otanlaiiyinurnecoveragordjcntorajinngpoetis.Rquriglablty isuanefrdamageoteseroetiswllpovdeadtinlprtetonfrDstitrsiet’ ie,limbandpropertyduringconrjcs.tionp TrgeteConcltotkepomptadfaorbeacionntheeclsdleiltin.fyouhve ayqustos,peaecotctEmesthapph,Dretr,DparmentfConsumerd RguatryAfir,atrnst.hrpph@c.ovor(02)42895.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Protecting Adjacent and Adjoining Property Owners from Construction Damage Amendment Act of 2022”.
Snepl, Murig] Bowser Enclosures e G b !M e or e ~ u tterqestftheMayor H d i ABILL a e INTHE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S Toamenetin6oftheostutinCoesAprvaladAmendmentctf196toeqie poeryower,cotatrs,rpesosaplingoraprmtforostutinwokto otinisracetonueadaentroetyonesforos rdamageatrssoutf tepopsedontutinwok.
Sec.
BEITENACTEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHEDISTRICTOFCOLUMBIA,attis ctmayectdaste“rtetngAjaentndAjonigPrprtyOwnerrmCostucin DamageAmendmectf202, Sc..Setin6(a)fteCosrutonCoesAprvaladAmendmentctf196, fetieArl20,999(..Law1226;D..OfiilCode§-10.0())samendedy ddnganewargrph(A)oredasolos:
2.
“(A()TheBulingCodefiilshl eure,oreritsorontucin workthatrequiresneighbornotificationundertheConstructionCodes,thatthepropertyowner, cotato,orprsnaplyngfrtepemitbtinisraceaantclimsfrijreso esosordamageoprpryfroml ajcntanddjiingroetyowersadlafl ocupntoftheoerisfrrssofos,damagopoety,rijryooreahoferos arisingoutonconnection with theperformance oftobe performeded t unerteprmt.Thensrneshl eoakindndinnamounteiiedyteMayory rule.
Section 6a(a) of the Construction Codes Approval and Amendments Act of 1986, effective March 21, 1987 (D.C.
“(ii) The Building Code Official may also require such insurance for a permitfor work thatdoes notrequire neighbor notification under the Construction Codesif the BilingCodefiildeerinsthreculdbeaetienalimpacoajonigorajaet roerisbasedonthescopissassociatedwiththeworkpobeperformedunder thermt”, (i)The pliatforapemitfrwhichnsraceisrqirdunder subparagr)ori)othsparagrahllsubmitp rsuh isuacetoheDepartment efreteisuacofthepri.
(i)TheMayormaysuerlstoimplemehiseton,pursuaote authority provided in Section 10 ofthe Construction Codes Approval and Amendments Act of 1986, effective March 21, 1987 (D.C.
Official Code § 6-1405.01(a)) is amended by adding a new paragraph (2A) to read as follows:
“(2A)(A) The Building Code Official shall require, for permits covered pursuant subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, that the property owner, contractor, or person applying for the permit:
“(i) Demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Building Code Official, that his or her insurance includes coverage against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property from all adjacent and adjoining property owners and lawful occupants of the properties ENGROSSED ORIGINAL for risks of loss, damage to property, or injury to or death of persons arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work proposed to be performed under the permit.
The insurance shall be in an amount per occurrence and in the aggregate as specified by the Mayor through rulemaking pursuant to subparagraph (D) of this paragraph;
or “(ii) If his or her insurance is not sufficient to meet the requirements of sub-subparagraph (i) of this subparagraph, then he or she must either amend his or her insurance policy so that the policy complies with sub-subparagraph (i) of this subparagraph, or obtain additional insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property from all adjacent and adjoining property owners and lawful occupants of the properties for risks of loss, damage to property, or injury to or death of persons arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work proposed to be performed under the permit.
Additional insurance shall be of a kind and in an amount specified by the Mayor through rulemaking pursuant to subparagraph (D) of this paragraph.
“(B) The following permits shall require insurance pursuant to subparagraph (A) of this paragraphater than 90 days after finals rules are promulgated by the Mayor pursuant to subparagraph (D) of this paragraph:
“(i) An addition, alteration, and repair permit in which the applicant will be engaging in construction at the property line or on the party wall of an adjacent or adjoining property;
“(ii) A demolition permit;
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(iii) An excavation permit;
“(iv) A raze permit;
and “(v) A sheeting and shoring permit.
“(C)(i) The applicant for a permit for which insurance is required under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph shall:
“(I) Submit proof of insurance to the Department before the issuance of the permit;
“(II) Demonstrate, on a form promulgated by the Department, that the insurance meets the requirements of sub-paragraph (A) of this paragraph;
and “(II) Maintain the required insurance for the duration of the permit and any renewals thereof.
In the event that the insurance expires, is cancelled, or otherwise terminates, the applicant shall immediately notify the Department, and, where applicable, provide proof of new or renewed insurance that satisfies the requirements of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.
“(ii) If, at any time, the insurance required by this paragraph is found to be absent or non-compliant by the Building Code Official, the Department shall issue a stop work order relating to the permit for which insurance is required.
The stop work order shall remain in place until the permit holder provides proof of new or renewed insurance that satisfies the requirements of this paragraph.
ENGROSSED ORIGINAL “(D) The Mayor shall issue rules to implement this paragraph, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 10 of the Construction Codes Approval and Amendments Act of 1986, effective March 21, 1987 (D.C.
Law 6-216;
D.C.
e.3.Fsclimpactaeet, The Council adopts the fiscalimpact statementinthecommittee reportasthe fiscal impact statementrequiredby section4aoftheGeneral Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved October 16,2006 (120 Stat.
Sec.
203e 1-301.47a).ial C o d§ Sec.
3.
Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat.
2038;
D.C.
Official Code§ 1-301.47a).
Sec.
ThicthaltakefctfollowingapproveMayor(orntheeventofvetebyt MayorctonbyheCuniltoverietheeo,a30-dayridofCngesioalreviesa provided in section 602(c)(I) ofthe DistrictofColumbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 StaC.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(I) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication inthe Districtof Columbieite.
813;
G O V E R N[OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, OrriceOF THEATTORNEY GENERAL x k B E E S e.
D.C.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
Previous
Latest
Cont,Divisio MEMOR.
Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.
TO:
BryanHum Interiirctr OficefPoicyandL islativeAffairs FROM:
BrianK,Flowers Deputy Attorn:
LegalCounseviion DATE:
May 18, 2022 SUBJECT:
LegalufiiecyReviewfDraftgiltin,te“ProtectingAdjacentand AdjoiningPropertyOwnersfromConstructionDamageAmendfentActo 2022” (AD-22-141) This is to Certify that t nsotienasrevieweheabove-referenced proposeeisaionandhasfountobelealysfiiet.
you haveesios regardiniseriicto,plesedontheitteoconactmeat724-5524.
Bunn 6.Flowere Brian K.
Flowers 330nslanavne,NW,ie4,Wahntn,DC 20004e:(2)2-565 i:aturakr@eov
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Final Reading

  2. Mendelson Amendment

  3. Committee Report Filed

  4. First Reading, CC

  5. Committee Mark-up of B24-0924

  6. Public Hearing on B24-0924 View Public Hearing Record

  7. Notice of Public Hearing Published in the District of Columbia Register

  8. Notice of Public Hearing filed in the Office of Secretary

  9. Notice of Intent to Act on B24-0924 Published in the District of Columbia Register

  10. Referred to Committee of the Whole

  11. B24-0924 Introduced by Chairman Mendelson at Office of the Secretary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on · 1 voted No

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Mendelson Amendment

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

Final Reading

Passed 12 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12100
Total 12100
% of votes cast 92%8%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Nay
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

First Reading, CC

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Anita Bonds — Yea
Brianne K. Nadeau — Yea
Brooke Pinto — Yea
Charles Allen — Yea
Christina Henderson — Yea
Elissa Silverman — Yea
Janeese Lewis George — Yea
Kenyan R. McDuffie — Yea
Mary Cheh — Yea
Phil Mendelson — Yea
Robert C. White, Jr. — Yea
Trayon White, Sr. — Yea
Vincent Gray — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors B 24-0924?
B 24-0924 is sponsored by Phil Mendelson.
What is the current status of B 24-0924?
This bill died with Council Period 24. It reached “Passed Council” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track B 24-0924?
Track B 24-0924 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on B 24-0924

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of B 24-0924

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →