New Mexico 2021 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

HM 26 — DEVELOP EDUCATION PLAN FOR YAZZIE LAWSUIT

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2021. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

125 added · 167 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HM 26 includes new provisions that require the Public Education Department to create a comprehensive education plan that addresses the court's findings in the Yazzie/Martinez case. This plan will be developed in consultation with the plaintiffs, and the Department will need to provide annual updates to the legislature on its progress and compliance with New Mexico's constitutional education requirements. These changes are significant because they aim to ensure that at-risk children receive equitable and adequate educational opportunities, which is essential for their success and well-being.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 26 55TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEWMEXICO - FIRST SESSION 2021 INTRODUCED BY Derrick J.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TO DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PLAN TO ADDRESS THE CONSOLIDATED YAZZIE/MARTINEZ V.
Lente 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TO DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PLAN TO ADDRESS THE CONSOLIDATED YAZZIE/MARTINEZ V.
REQUESTING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE LEGISLATURE WITH AN ANNUAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION e t 17 PLAN AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO TO w l n d 18 PROVIDE AT-RISK CHILDREN WITH A UNIFORM AND SUFFICIENT = = 19 a l EDUCATION.
REQUESTING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE THE LEGISLATURE WITH AN ANNUAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PLAN AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF NEW MEXICO TO PROVIDE AT-RISK CHILDREN WITH A UNIFORM AND SUFFICIENT EDUCATION.
i a e r 20 a t m m 21 WHEREAS, all New Mexico children have a constitutional and d r e 22 human right to a quality and sufficient education;
WHEREAS, all New Mexico children have a constitutional and human right to a quality and sufficient education;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, in the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
and WHEREAS, in the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
State of e a n b 24 u [ New Mexico court decision and order of July 2018, the court held that the state was violating the constitutional rights of .220661.2 at-risk students to a sufficient education, one that provides them with an adequate opportunity to prepare for college and careers;
State of New Mexico court decision and order of July 2018, the court held that the state was violating the constitutional rights of at-risk students to a sufficient education, one that provides them with an adequate opportunity to prepare for college and careers;
and WHEREAS, the court directed the executive and legislative branches of government to work cooperatively to accomplish this constitutional mandate;
and HM 26 Page 1 WHEREAS, the court directed the executive and legislative branches of government to work cooperatively to accomplish this constitutional mandate;
and WHEREAS, in June 2020, the court rejected the state's 14 motion to dismiss the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
and WHEREAS, in June 2020, the court rejected the state's motion to dismiss the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
State of New Mexico case and held that the state must ensure that long-term comprehensive reforms are made so that all at-risk e t 17 students have the opportunity to be ready for college and w l n d 18 careers, and that the court would retain jurisdiction over the = = 19 case to enforce compliance with its 2018 decision and order and a l i a e r 20 2019 final judgment;
State of New Mexico case and held that the state must ensure that long-term comprehensive reforms are made so that all at-risk students have the opportunity to be ready for college and careers, and that the court would retain jurisdiction over the case to enforce compliance with its 2018 decision and order and 2019 final judgment;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, the court's decision and findings detail the d r e 22 deficiencies of New Mexico's educational system, including c e s k 23 insufficient overall funding for school districts and for e a n b 24 programs and services to specifically support at-risk students, u [ the failure to comply with state law requiring multicultural .220661.2 - 2 - and multilingual education for students, the lack of experienced and well-prepared teachers in classes serving at-risk students, the lack of adequate curricula such as extended learning programs, early childhood education and pre-K programs, the need for smaller class sizes and reading programs, the lack of student supports such as technology, transportation and career and vocational programs, inadequate programming for English language learners, insufficient special education programs and ancillary services and insufficient resources for health and social services, among other areas;
and WHEREAS, the court's decision and findings detail the deficiencies of New Mexico's educational system, including insufficient overall funding for school districts and for programs and services to specifically support at-risk students, the failure to comply with state law requiring multicultural and multilingual education for students, the lack of experienced and well-prepared teachers in classes serving at-risk students, the lack of adequate curricula such as extended learning programs, early childhood education and pre-K programs, the need for smaller class sizes and reading programs, the lack of student supports such as technology, transportation and career and vocational programs, inadequate programming for English language learners, insufficient special education programs and ancillary services and HM 26 Page 2 insufficient resources for health and social services, among other areas;
and WHEREAS, since the 2018 court decision and order, the state has not developed a comprehensive plan to show how it 14 intends to fix the educational system and the multiyear funding needed to guide resource investments;
and WHEREAS, since the 2018 court decision and order, the state has not developed a comprehensive plan to show how it intends to fix the educational system and the multiyear funding needed to guide resource investments;
and WHEREAS, the state should attempt to work cooperatively e t 17 with the plaintiffs to jointly develop a comprehensive w l n d 18 education plan to meet the mandates of the consolidated = = 19 Yazzie/Martinez v.
and WHEREAS, the state should attempt to work cooperatively with the plaintiffs to jointly develop a comprehensive education plan to meet the mandates of the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
State of New Mexico court ruling and avoid a l i a e r 20 ongoing litigation by resolving the case;
State of New Mexico court ruling and avoid ongoing litigation by resolving the case;
a t m m 21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF d r e 22 REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the state, c e s k 23 through the public education department, be requested to e a n b 24 immediately develop a comprehensive education plan, by no later u [ than September 30, 2021, to address the systemic education .220661.2 - 3 - inequities and deficiencies identified by the court in the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the state, through the public education department, be requested to immediately develop a comprehensive education plan, by no later than September 30, 2021, to address the systemic education inequities and deficiencies identified by the court in the consolidated Yazzie/Martinez v.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the comprehensive education plan include short- and long-term goals and action steps that address the insufficiencies detailed by the court's decision and findings, time frames, staffing, accountability measures and the projected funding amounts required to meet students' education needs;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the comprehensive education plan include short- and long-term goals and action steps that address the insufficiencies detailed by the court's decision and findings, time frames, staffing, accountability measures HM 26 Page 3 and the projected funding amounts required to meet students' education needs;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education department be requested to develop the comprehensive education plan jointly in consultation with the Yazzie and Martinez 14 plaintiffs and attempt to resolve the case;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education department be requested to develop the comprehensive education plan jointly in consultation with the Yazzie and Martinez plaintiffs and attempt to resolve the case;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this comprehensive education plan build on existing plans and recommendations developed by e t 17 education and tribal community stakeholders and researchers;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this comprehensive education plan build on existing plans and recommendations developed by education and tribal community stakeholders and researchers;
w l n d 18 and = = 19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education a l i a e r 20 department be requested to provide the legislature, the a t m m 21 legislative finance committee and the legislative education d r e 22 study committee with an annual report on the state's c e s k 23 implementation of the comprehensive education plan and e a n b 24 compliance with the constitution of New Mexico to provide u [ at-risk students with a uniform and sufficient education;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public education department be requested to provide the legislature, the legislative finance committee and the legislative education study committee with an annual report on the state's implementation of the comprehensive education plan and compliance with the constitution of New Mexico to provide at-risk students with a uniform and sufficient education;
and .220661.2 - 4 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the governor, the secretary of public education, the secretary of higher education, the secretary of early childhood education and care, the secretary of Indian affairs, the legislative finance committee, the legislative education study committee, the Indian education advisory council, the Hispanic education advisory council, the bilingual multicultural education advisory council and the regents, chancellors and presidents of the state institutions of higher education.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the governor, the secretary of public education, the secretary of higher education, the secretary of early childhood education and care, the secretary of Indian affairs, the legislative finance committee, the legislative education study committee, the Indian education advisory council, the Hispanic education advisory council, the bilingual multicultural education advisory council and the HM 26 Page 4 regents, chancellors and presidents of the state institutions of higher education.
- 5 - 13 15 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .220661.2
HM 26 Page 5 4 6 8 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Education Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 26?
HM 26 is sponsored by Derrick J. Lente (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 26?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 26?
Track HM 26 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 26

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 26

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →