A bill for an act concerning county supervisor representation plans.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HF 216 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HF 216.
You're tracking HF 216
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HF 216 — A bill for an act concerning county supervisor representation plans.
Last action — Subcommittee Meeting: 03/06/2019 9:00AM House Lounge.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill mandates that counties with a population of 60,000 or more must use plan 'three' for the election of county supervisors, while providing a transition provision for those not currently using this plan.
-
Section 331.206, subsection 2, paragraph a
However, a county with a population of sixty thousand or more based on the most recent federal decennial census shall use plan “three” for the election of supervisors.→ However, a county with a population of sixty thousand or more based on the most recent federal decennial census shall use plan “three” for the election of supervisors.This change clarifies that counties of this size must adopt plan 'three' for supervisor elections.
-
Section 331.207, subsection 6
subsection 6This change removes subsection 6 entirely, altering the requirements for adopting representation plans.
Action History
-
Subcommittee Meeting: 03/06/2019 9:00AM House Lounge.
-
Subcommittee: Thompson, Gaskill and Hanusa.
-
Introduced, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- Dean Fisher · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dean Fisher Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HF 216?
- HF 216 is sponsored by Dean Fisher (Republican).
- What is the current status of HF 216?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HF 216?
- Track HF 216 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HF 216
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HF 216
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →