Event Contract Enforcement Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 7840 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 7840.
You're tracking HR 7840
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 7840 — Event Contract Enforcement Act
Last action — Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2588-2589)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 05, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html March 05, 2026
Sections of law this bill changes
1 section in 1 lawFrom the bill's own amending language, matched to the official United States Code (current through Public Law 119-121).
Commodity exchanges · 7 U.S.C. ch. 1 1 section
-
§ 7a-2 Common provisions applicable to registered entities Amends
7 U.S.C. § 7a-2 — at 7a-2(c)(5)(C)
The law today
(a) Acceptable business practices under core principles (1) In general Consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the Commission may issue interpretations, or approve interpretations submitted to the Commission, of sections 7(d) and 7a–1(c)(2) of this title, to describe what would constitute an acceptable business practice under such sections. (2) Effect of interpretation An interpretation issued under paragraph (1) may provide the exclusive means for complying with each section described in paragraph (1). (b) Delegation of functions under core principles (1) In general A contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or electronic trading facility with respect to a significant price discovery contract may comply with any applicable core principle through delegation of any relevant function to a registered futures association or a registered entity that is not an electronic trading facility. (2) Responsibility A contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or electronic trading facility that delegates a function under paragraph (1) shall remain responsible for carrying out the function. (3) Noncompliance If a contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or electronic trading facility that delegates a function under paragraph (1) becomes aware that a delegated function is not being performed as required under this chapter, the contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or electronic trading facility shall promptly take steps to address the noncompliance. (c) New contracts, new rules, and rule amendments (1) In general A registered entity may elect to list for trading or accept for clearing any new contract, or other instrument, or may elect to approve and implement any new rule or rule amendment, by providing to the Commission (and the Secretary of the Treasury, in the case of a contract of sale of a government security for future delivery (or option on such a contract) or a rule or rule amendment specifically related to such a contract) a written certification that the new contract or instrument or clearing of the new contract or instrument, new rule, or rule amendment complies with this chapter (including regulations under this chapter). (2) Rule review The new rule or rule amendment described in paragraph (1) shall become effective, pursuant to the certification of the registered entity and notice of such certification to its members (in a manner to be determined by the Commission), on the date that is 10 business days after the date on which the Commission receives the certification (or such shorter period as determined by the Commission by rule or regulation) unless the Commission notifies the registered entity within such time that it is staying the certification because there exist novel or complex issues that require additional time to analyze, an inadequate explanation by the submitting registered entity, or a potential inconsistency with this chapter (including regulations under this chapter). (3) Stay of certification for rules (A) A notification by the Commission pursuant to paragraph (2) shall stay the certification of the new rule or rule amendment for up to an additional 90 days from the date of the notification. (B) A rule or rule amendment subject to a stay pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall become effective, pursuant to the certification of the registered entity, at the expiration of the period described in subparagraph (A) unless the Commission— (i) withdraws the stay prior to that time; or (ii) notifies the registered entity during such period that it objects to the proposed certification on the grounds that it is inconsistent with this chapter (including regulations under this chapter). (C) The Commission shall provide a not less than 30-day public comment period, within the 90-day period in which the stay is in effect as described in subparagraph (A), whenever the Commission reviews a rule or rule amendment pursuant to a notification by ...21 other bills also change this section · Follow it → Official text at uscode.house.gov ↗
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit certain event contracts and allows states to exempt themselves from this prohibition.
-
7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c)(5)(C)
clauses (i) and (ii)→ (i) Event contracts.--Subject to clause (ii), it shall be unlawful to list or make available for trading on or through a registered entity an agreement, contract, transaction, or swap in an excluded commodity that is based on an occurrence, the extent of an occurrence, or a contingency (other than a change in the price, rate, value, or level of a commodity described in section 1a(19)(i)) in relation to-- (I) activity that is unlawful under Federal or State law; (II) terrorism; (III) assassination; (IV) war; (V) gaming; (VI) the result of any vote in an election (as defined in section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) held under Federal, State, or local law, including a ballot initiative or referendum; (VII) conduct by or in any level or branch of the Federal Government or of any State or local government, including by or in any instrumentality or by any personnel of any level or branch of any such government; or (VIII) other similar activity determined by the Commission, by rule or regulation, to be contrary to the public interest. (ii) Exemption.--Clause (i)(V) shall not apply with respect to conduct in a State if the law of the State expressly exempts conduct in the State from the application of such clause.This change establishes a prohibition on event contracts related to specific activities deemed contrary to the public interest and introduces an exemption for states.
-
7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c)(5)(C)
(v) Gaming defined.--In clause (i), the term `gaming' means any aspect of a live, simulated, or virtual physical or mental challenge or game of chance.
This addition defines 'gaming' for clarity within the context of the prohibition on event contracts.
Action History
-
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2588-2589)
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Sponsors
- Gabe Vasquez · Cosponsor
- Jodey C. Arrington · Cosponsor
- Salud O. Carbajal · Cosponsor
- Blake D. Moore · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 543 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Moore, Blake D. Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Vasquez, Gabe Democratic
- Arrington, Jodey C. Republican
- Carbajal, Salud O. Democratic
Not signed on (543)
543 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 543 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HR 7840?
- HR 7840 is sponsored by Vasquez, Gabe (Democratic), Arrington, Jodey C. (Republican), Carbajal, Salud O. (Democratic), and Moore, Blake D. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 7840?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 05, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 7840?
- Track HR 7840 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 7840
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 7840
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →