HF 217 — A bill for an act concerning review of disapproval of applications for retail alcohol licenses by local authorities.
Last action — Introduced, referred to Commerce.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill eliminates an administrative appeal process for disapproval of retail alcohol licenses and allows applicants to seek judicial review directly through the district court.
-
Section 123.32, subsection 6, paragraph a
Upon receipt of an application having been disapproved by the local authority, the administrator shall notify the applicant that the applicant may appeal the disapproval of the application to the administrator district court as provided in this section.→ Upon receipt of an application having been disapproved by the local authority, the applicant shall be notified by certified mail or personal service, and the application, the fee, and any bond shall be returned to the applicant.This change removes the appeal process to the administrator, simplifying the response to applicants whose applications are disapproved.
-
Section 123.32, subsection 7
This subsection is struck.This change eliminates the existing provisions for appealing to the administrator regarding disapproved applications.
-
Section 123.32, subsection 8
The applicant may file an action in the district court of the county where the premises covered by the application is situated to seek judicial review of the action of the local authority in disapproving an application.
This addition allows applicants to seek judicial review directly through the district court rather than through the administrator.
Action History
-
Introduced, referred to Commerce.
Sponsors
- Timi M. Brown-Powers · Primary
- Austin Baeth · Primary
- Monica Kurth · Primary
- Dr. Megan L. Srinivas · Primary
- ABDUL-SAMAD · Primary
- J.D. Scholten · Primary
- Jerome Amos Jr. · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Timi M. Brown-Powers Democrat
- Austin Baeth Democrat
- Monica Kurth Democrat
- Dr. Megan L. Srinivas Democrat
- ABDUL-SAMAD
- J.D. Scholten Democrat
- Jerome Amos Jr. Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HF 217?
- HF 217 is sponsored by Timi M. Brown-Powers (Democrat), Austin Baeth (Democrat), Monica Kurth (Democrat), Dr. Megan L. Srinivas (Democrat), ABDUL-SAMAD, J.D. Scholten (Democrat), and Jerome Amos Jr. (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HF 217?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HF 217?
- Track HF 217 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HF 217
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HF 217
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →