CLEAR Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 7140 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 7140.
You're tracking HR 7140
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 7140 — CLEAR Act
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 16, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html January 16, 2026
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds provisions for granting a stay of patent infringement actions against retailers or end users under certain conditions.
-
35 U.S.C. Chapter 29
Sec. 299A. Stay of action against retailer or end user (a) Entry of Stay.--In a civil action in which a party asserts a claim for relief for infringement of a patent, the court shall grant a motion to stay at least the portion of the action against a retailer or end user of an accused instrumentality if-- (1) the manufacturer of the accused instrumentality is a party to the action or a separate action involving the patent and the accused instrumentality; (2) the retailer or end user does not manufacture, assemble, integrate, or transform the accused instrumentality or a relevant part thereof; (3) the retailer or end user agrees that if a final judgment on the merits is entered in the action to which the manufacturer is a party, for any future action involving the same accused instrumentality supplied by the same manufacturer, the retailer or end user-- (A) waives all defenses under section 282(b); and (B) is bound by any issue decided in the action to which the manufacturer is a party; and (4) the retailer or end user agrees to be bound by any injunction issued with respect to the accused instrumentality in the action to which the manufacturer is a party. (b) Lift of Stay.--A stay entered under this section shall be lifted upon a showing that the manufacturer cannot be made to satisfy a damages judgment. (c) Bond or Escrow.--The court may conduct an initial hearing or inquiry to determine if the manufacturer can be made to satisfy a damages judgment. If the court determines that there is a substantial likelihood that the manufacturer will not satisfy a damages judgment, the court may require the retailer or end user to post a bond or place funds or other property in escrow. (d) Stipulation as To Use of Accused Instrumentality.--The court may, as necessary in view of an infringement claim against the manufacturer, require the end user or retailer to stipulate as to the extent of the use of the accused instrumentality and allow limited discovery as to such use. (e) Time Limit.--A motion for a stay under this section shall be filed not later than the later of-- (1) six months after the service of the first pleading or paper in the action that specifically identifies the accused instrumentality and how the accused instrumentality is alleged to infringe the patent; (2) six months after the date on which the manufacturer becomes a party to an action involving the patent and the accused instrumentality; or (3) the entry of the first scheduling order in the case. (f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the discretion of a court to enter a stay under other authority. (g) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Accused instrumentality.--The term `accused instrumentality' means a product, or an instrumentality that implements a process, that is a material part of the claimed invention. (2) Affiliate.--The term `affiliate' means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control of another entity. (3) End user.--The term `end user' means an entity that does not use the accused instrumentality other than for the ordinary and intended purpose of the instrumentality and that does not direct, obligate, or induce the manufacturer to make the accused instrumentality. (4) Manufacturer.--The term `manufacturer' means an entity that makes, assembles, integrates, transforms, or supplies the accused instrumentality. (5) Retailer.--The term `retailer' means an entity that generates revenues predominantly through the sale to the public of consumer goods or services, or an affiliate of such entity.
This establishes a legal mechanism for stays in patent infringement cases involving retailers and end users under specific conditions.
-
35 U.S.C. Chapter 29
The table of sections for chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item: Sec. 299A. Stay of action against retailer or end user.
This updates the official table of sections to include the new section regarding stays of action against retailers or end users.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Zoe Lofgren · Cosponsor
- Laurel M. Lee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 545 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lee, Laurel M. Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Lofgren, Zoe Democratic
Not signed on (545)
545 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 545 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HR 7140?
- HR 7140 is sponsored by Lofgren, Zoe (Democratic) and Lee, Laurel M. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 7140?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 16, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HR 7140?
- Track HR 7140 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 7140
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 7140
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →