District of Columbia Council Period 23 Status: Enacted

B 23-0809 — Firearms Safety Omnibus Clarification Congressional Review Emergency

Last action — Act A23-0342 Published in DC Register Vol 67 and Page 9368, Expires on Oct 24, 2020

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Council
  4. ✓
    To Executive
  5. 5
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

394 added · 382 removed

394 line(s) added, 382 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Councilmember Charles Allen 4 A BILL 7 ____________ 9 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________ To amend, on an emergency basis, due to congressional review, the Office of Administrative Hearings Establishment Act of 2001 to extend the jurisdiction of the Office of Administrative Hearings to adjudicated cases involving certain civil violations relating to fare evasion and other unlawful conduct on passenger vehicles;
ENROLLED ORIGINAL AN ACT ____________ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________ To amend, on an emergency basis, due to congressional review, the Office of Administrative Hearings Establishment Act of 2001 to extend the jurisdiction of the Office of Administrative Hearings to adjudicated cases involving certain civil violations relating to fare evasion and other unlawful conduct on passenger vehicles;
to amend the District of Columbia Mental Health Information Act of 1978 to authorize mental health professionals to disclose mental health information when necessaryto request an extreme risk protection order and to require the disclosure of mental health information to the Office of Attorney General in response to a court order;
to amend the District of Columbia Mental Health Information Act of 1978 to authorize mental health professionals to disclose mental health information when necessary to request an extreme risk protection order and to require the disclosure of mental health information to the Office of Attorney General in response to a court order;
to amend the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975to prohibit the issuanceofa firearmregistrationcertificatetothesubject ofanextreme risk protection order, to require the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, for good cause shown, to issue such orders as may be necessaryto obtain mental health records and other relevant information for the purposes of petitions for relief from disqualifications from firearm registration, to authorize the Mayor to issue rules - subject to Council review, to implement the provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, to clarify that the Office of AttorneyGeneral may intervene and represent the interests ofthe District of Columbia with respect to petitions for extreme risk protection orders or provide individual legal representation, upon request, to a petitioner, to broaden the court’s ability to place records related to extreme risk protectionorders under seal, to establishprocedures for computing periods of time relating to an extreme risk protection order, to provide for the use of calendar days instead of business days for timelines related to extreme risk protection orders, to require that the court consider the unlawful or reckless use, display, orbrandishing ofanyweaponbytherespondent indeterminingwhether toissueanextreme risk protection order, to require that the initial hearing for a petition for a final extreme risk protection order be held within 14 days after the petition was filed, to require the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, for good cause shown, to issue such orders as may be necessary to obtain mental health records and other relevant information for the purposes ofpetitions for anextreme risk protectionorder, to modifythe durationofexparte extreme risk protection orders, to establish procedures for the issuance and execution of search warrants accompanying extreme risk protection orders, to add the Office of Attorney General and the Superior Court for the District of Columbia to the list of entities that shall receive from the Metropolitan Police Department information related to extreme risk protection orders, to require the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to submit information about extreme risk protection orders to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System for the purposes of firearm purchaser background checks;
to amend the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 to prohibit the issuance of a firearm registration certificate to the subject of an extreme risk protection order, to require the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, for good cause shown, to issue such orders as may be necessary to obtain mental health records and other relevant information for the purposes of petitions for relief from disqualifications from firearm registration, to authorize the Mayor to issue rules - subject to Council review, to implement the provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, to clarify that the Office of Attorney General may intervene and represent the interests of the District of Columbia with respect to petitions for extreme risk protection orders or provide individual legal representation, upon request, to a petitioner, to broaden the court’s ability to place records related to extreme risk protection orders under seal, to establish procedures for computing periods of time relating to an extreme risk protection order, to provide for the use of calendar days instead of business days for timelines related to extreme risk protection orders, to require that the court consider the unlawful or reckless use, display, or brandishing of any weapon by the respondent in determining whether to issue an extreme risk protection order, to require that the initial hearing for a petition for a final extreme risk protection order be held within 14 days after the petition was filed, to require the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, for good cause shown, to issue such orders as may be necessary to obtain mental health records and other relevant information for the purposes of petitions for an extreme risk protection order, to modify the duration of ex parte extreme risk protection orders, to establish procedures for the issuance and execution of search warrants ENROLLED ORIGINAL accompanying extreme risk protection orders, to add the Office of Attorney General and the Superior Court for the District of Columbia to the list of entities that shall receive from the Metropolitan Police Department information related to extreme risk protection orders, to require the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to submit information about extreme risk protection orders to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System for the purposes of firearm purchaser background checks;
to amend the Homeland Security, Risk Reduction, and Preparedness Amendment Act of 2006 to create a quorum requirement for the Comprehensive Homicide EliminationStrategyTask Force and extend its report submission deadline;
to amend the Homeland Security, Risk Reduction, and Preparedness Amendment Act of 2006 to create a quorum requirement for the Comprehensive Homicide Elimination Strategy Task Force and extend its report submission deadline;
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Firearms SafetyOmnibus Clarification Congressional Review Emergency Amendment Act of 2020”.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Firearms Safety Omnibus Clarification Congressional Review Emergency Amendment Act of 2020”.
Section 6 of the Office of Administrative Hearings Establishment Act of 2001, effective March6, 2002 (D.C.
Section 6 of the Office of Administrative Hearings Establishment Act of 2001, effective March 6, 2002 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-1831.03), is amended byadding a new subsection (b-26) to read as follows:
Official Code § 2-1831.03), is amended by adding a new subsection (b-26) to read as follows:
or “(2) Request anextreme risk protectionorder under Title X ofthe Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, effective May 10, 2019 (D.C.
or “(2) Request an extreme risk protection order under Title X of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, effective May 10, 2019 (D.C.
“(c) Mental health information shall be disclosed to the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia in response to a court order issued pursuant to section 203(f)(3)(A)(i) of the Firearms ControlRegulations Act of1975, effective September 24, 1976(D.C.
“(c) Mental health information shall be disclosed to the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia in response to a court order issued pursuant to section ENROLLED ORIGINAL 203(f)(3)(A)(i) of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, effective September 24, 1976 (D.C.
The Firearms ControlRegulations Act of1975, effective September 24, 1976 (D.C.
The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, effective September 24, 1976 (D.C.
The order shall require the disclosure of records to the Office of the Attorney General so that the 98 Office of the Attorney General can conduct a search of the petitioner’s mental health records and report its findings to the court as required by subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.
The order shall require the disclosure of records to the Office of the Attorney General so that the Office of the Attorney General can conduct a search of the petitioner’s mental health records and report its findings to the court as required by subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.
Official Code § 7–2507.05(b)) is amended by striking the phrase “the United States Attorney and the Corporation Counsel for the District whether” and inserting the phrase “the United States Attorney’s Office and the Office of AttorneyGeneral whether” in its place.
Official Code § 7–2507.05(b)) is amended by striking the phrase “the United States Attorney and the Corporation Counsel for the District whether” and inserting the phrase “the United States Attorney’s Office and the Office of Attorney General whether” in its place.
The proposed rules shall be submitted to the Council for a 45-dayperiod ofreview, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, legal holidays, anddaysofCouncilrecess.
The proposed rules shall be submitted to the Council for a 45-day period of review, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, legal holidays, and days of Council recess.
Ifthe Council does not approve or disapprove the proposed rules, inwhole or inpart, byresolution within the 45-day review period, the proposed rules shall be deemed approved.”.
If the Council does not approve or disapprove the proposed rules, in whole or in part, by resolution within the 45-day review period, the proposed rules shall be deemed approved.”.
(d) Section 1001(2)(A) (D.C.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL (d) Section 1001(2)(A) (D.C.
or “(C) The Office ofthe AttorneyGeneral withdraws from the intervention.”.
or “(C) The Office of the Attorney General withdraws from the intervention.”.
“(d) Thecourt mayplaceanyrecordor partofaproceedingrelatedtothe issuance, renewal, or termination of an extreme risk protection order under seal for good cause shown.”.
“(d) The court may place any record or part of a proceeding related to the issuance, renewal, or termination of an extreme risk protection order under seal for good cause shown.”.
“(B) Count everyday, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays;
“(B) Count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays;
and “(C) Include the last day of the time period, but if the last day of the time period specified falls on a Saturday, Sunday, a legal holiday, or a day on which weather or other conditions cause the court to be closed, the time period specified shall continue to rununtilthe end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or a day on which weather or other conditions cause the court to be closed.
and “(C) Include the last day of the time period, but if the last day of the time period specified falls on a Saturday, Sunday, a legal holiday, or a day on which weather or other conditions cause the court to be closed, the time period specified shall continue to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or a day on which weather or other conditions cause the court to be closed.
“(B) Count every hour, including hours during intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays;
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(B) Count every hour, including hours during intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays;
Before the hearing for afinalextremerisk protectionorder,the court shallorderthat theOfficeofthe Attorney General:
Before the hearing for a final extreme risk protection order, the court shall order that the Office of the Attorney General:
“(2) Conduct areasonable searchofallavailable recordsofthe respondent’s mental health;
“(2) Conduct a reasonable search of all available records of the respondent’s mental health;
(A) The lead-in language for subsection (c) is amended by striking the phrase “consider allrelevant evidence,” and inserting the phrase “consider anyexhibits, affidavits, supporting documents, and all other relevant evidence,” in its place.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL (A) The lead-in language for subsection (c) is amended by striking the phrase “consider all relevant evidence,” and inserting the phrase “consider any exhibits, affidavits, supporting documents, and all other relevant evidence,” in its place.
“(7) The procedures for the surrender of firearms, ammunition, registration certificates, licenses to carrya concealed pistol, ordealer’s licenses inthe respondent’s possession, control, or ownership pursuant to section 1007;
“(7) The procedures for the surrender of firearms, ammunition, registration certificates, licenses to carry a concealed pistol, or dealer’s licenses in the respondent’s possession, control, or ownership pursuant to section 1007;
(2) Paragraph (3) is amended bystriking the phrase “5 business days” and inserting the phrase “7 days” in its place.
(2) Paragraph (3) is amended by striking the phrase “5 business days” and inserting the phrase “7 days” in its place.
“(a) Ifthe court issues a final extreme risk protectionorder pursuant to section1003, issues an ex parte extreme risk protection order pursuant to section 1004, or renews a final extreme risk protection order pursuant to section 1006, the court may issue an accompanying search warrant.
“(a) If the court issues a final extreme risk protection order pursuant to section 1003, issues an ex parte extreme risk protection order pursuant to section 1004, or renews a final extreme risk protection order pursuant to section 1006, the court may issue an accompanying search warrant.
“(1) One or more designated or described places or premises;
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(1) One or more designated or described places or premises;
“(1) The name ofthe issuing court,the name and signatureofthe issuing judge, and the date of issuance;
“(1) The name of the issuing court, the name and signature of the issuing judge, and the date of issuance;
“(4) A description of the propertywhose seizure is the object ofthe search warrant;
“(4) A description of the property whose seizure is the object of the search warrant;
“(c) A search warrant issued under section 1007a may be executed on any day of the week and, intheabsenceofexpressauthorizationinthewarrant pursuant to subsection(c) ofthissection, shall be executed only between 6 a.m.
“(c) A search warrant issued under section 1007a may be executed on any day of the week and, in the absence of express authorization in the warrant pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, shall be executed only between 6 a.m.
“(d) If the court finds that there is probable cause to believe that the search warrant cannot be executed between6 a.m.
“(d) If the court finds that there is probable cause to believe that the search warrant cannot be executed between 6 a.m.
and 9:00 p.m., the propertysought is likelyto be removed or destroyed if not seized forthwith, or the property sought is not likely to be found except at certain times or in certain circumstances, the court may include in the search warrant an authorization for execution at any time of day or night.
and 9:00 p.m., the property sought is likely to be removed or destroyed if not seized forthwith, or the property sought is not likely to be found except at certain times or in certain circumstances, the court may include in the search warrant an authorization for execution at any time of day or night.
“Sec.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “Sec.
“(b) An officer executing a search warrant issued under section 1007a directing a search of a person shall give, or make reasonable effort to give, notice of his identity and purpose to the person, and, if such person thereafter resists or refuses to permit the search, such person shall be subject to arrest by suchofficer pursuant to D.C.
“(b) An officer executing a search warrant issued under section 1007a directing a search of a person shall give, or make reasonable effort to give, notice of his identity and purpose to the person, and, if such person thereafter resists or refuses to permit the search, such person shall be subject to arrest by such officer pursuant to D.C.
Official Code § 23-581(a) for violationofsection 432aofthe Revised Statutesofthe District ofColumbia (D.C.
Official Code § 23-581(a) for violation of section 432a of the Revised Statutes of the District of Columbia (D.C.
Official Code §22-405.01),orother applicable provision of law.
Official Code § 22- 405.01), or other applicable provision of law.
“(2) If the search is of a person, a copyof the search warrant and of the return shall be given to that person.
“(2) If the search is of a person, a copy of the search warrant and of the return shall be given to that person.
“(b) Nothing in subsection (a) of this section shall be construed to require the Metropolitan Police Department to release propertyseized pursuant to a warrant to a person who did not legally possess the property at the time it was taken.
“(b) Nothing in subsection (a) of this section shall be construed to require the Metropolitan Police Department to release property seized pursuant to a warrant to a person who did not legally possess the property at the time it was taken.
“(c) No property seized shall be released or destroyed except in accordance with law and upon order of a court or of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia or the Office of the Attorney General.”.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL “(c) No property seized shall be released or destroyed except in accordance with law and upon order of a court or of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia or the Office of the Attorney General.”.
“(1A) If the petitioner or respondent was personally served in court when the motion to terminate anextreme risk protectionorder was granted,the personalservice requirement of paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be waived with respect to the party served in court.”.
“(1A) If the petitioner or respondent was personally served in court when the motion to terminate an extreme risk protection order was granted, the personal service requirement of paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be waived with respect to the party served in court.”.
Show all 48 changed rows (8 more)
Previous
Latest
(D) Paragraph(4) is amended bystriking the phrase “one business day” and inserting the phrase “24 hours” in its place.
(D) Paragraph (4) is amended by striking the phrase “one business day” and inserting the phrase “24 hours” in its place.
(2) Subsection (b) is amended by striking the phrase “Superior Court ofthe District of Columbia” and inserting the phrase “Mayor, or the Mayor’s designee,” in its place.
(2) Subsection (b) is amended by striking the phrase “Superior Court of the District of Columbia” and inserting the phrase “Mayor, or the Mayor’s designee,” in its place.
(b) Subsection(c) isamended bystrikingthephrase “June1, 2019”and insertingthephrase “June 1, 2020” in its place.
(b) Subsection (c) is amended by striking the phrase “June 1, 2019” and inserting the phrase “June 1, 2020” in its place.
Sec.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL Sec.
Official Code § 2-501 et seq.), may issue rules to implement the provisions ofthis paragraph.
Official Code § 2-501 et seq.), may issue rules to implement the provisions of this paragraph.
“(3) Individuals authorized to issue notices of infractions for the violations penalized under this subsection include anypolice officer withauthorityto make arrests withinthe District, including members of the Metro Transit Police Department.”.
“(3) Individuals authorized to issue notices of infractions for the violations penalized under this subsection include any police officer with authority to make arrests within the District, including members of the Metro Transit Police Department.”.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), and shall remain in effect for no longer than 90 days, as provided for emergency acts of the Council of the District of Columbia in section 412(a) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), and shall remain in effect for no longer than days, as provided for emergency acts of the Council of the District of Columbia in section ENROLLED ORIGINAL 412(a) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
16
______________________________ Chairman Council of the District of Columbia _________________________________ Mayor District of Columbia 11
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Act A23-0342 Published in DC Register Vol 67 and Page 9368, Expires on Oct 24, 2020

  2. Returned from Mayor

  3. Signed by the Mayor and Enacted with Act Number A23-0342, Expires on Oct 24, 2020

  4. Transmitted to Mayor, Response Due on Jul 28, 2020

  5. Final Reading, CC

  6. Retained by the Council

  7. B23-0809 Introduced by Councilmember Allen at Office of the Secretary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors B 23-0809?
B 23-0809 is sponsored by Charles Allen.
What is the current status of B 23-0809?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced July 02, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track B 23-0809?
Track B 23-0809 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on B 23-0809

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of B 23-0809

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →