California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee 2 D cosponsors

AB 484 — Sentencing enhancements: property loss.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

State law, repealed as of January 1, 2018, required a court to impose an additional term of imprisonment, as specified, on any person who takes, damages, or destroys any property in the commission or attempted commission of a felony, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2028, authorize the court, if a person takes, damages, or destroys property in the commission or attempted commission of a felony, with the intent to cause that taking, damage, or destruction, to impose an additional term of imprisonment of up to 2 years if the property loss exceeds $275,000, an additional term of imprisonment of up to 3 years if the property loss exceeds $1,750,000, or an additional term of imprisonment of up to 4 years if the property loss exceeds $4,400,000. Existing law provides for enhanced penalties against a person who commits 2 or more related felonies, a material element of which is fraud or embezzlement, that involve a pattern of related felony conduct, and the pattern of related felony conduct involves the taking or loss of more than $100,000. Existing law makes the additional punishment, if it involves the taking or loss of more than $500,000, a term of 2, 3, or 5 years in the state prison. Existing law, until January 1, 2018, due to an obsolete cross-reference to the repealed provisions described above, made the additional punishment, if it involves a taking or loss of more than $100,000 but less than $500,000, punishable by 2 years in the state prison if the loss was more than $200,000, and one year if the loss was less than that. This bill would remove that obsolete cross-reference and make that additional punishment equal to 2 years in the state prison. Because this bill would increase the penalty for existing felonies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. Read second time and amended.

  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 14).

  9. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.

  11. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 484 do?
State law, repealed as of January 1, 2018, required a court to impose an additional term of imprisonment, as specified, on any person who takes, damages, or destroys any property in the commission or attempted commission of a felony, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2028, authorize the court, if a person takes, damages, or destroys property in the commission or attempted commission of a felony, with the intent to cause that taking, damage, or destruction, to impose an additional term of imprisonment of up to 2 years if the property loss exceeds $275,000, an additional term of imprisonment of up to 3 years if the property loss exceeds $1,750,000, or an additional term of imprisonment of up to 4 years if the property loss exceeds $4,400,000. Existing law provides for enhanced penalties against a person who commits 2 or more related felonies, a material element of which is fraud or embezzlement, that involve a pattern of related felony conduct, and the pattern of related felony conduct involves the taking or loss of more than $100,000. Existing law makes the additional punishment, if it involves the taking or loss of more than $500,000, a term of 2, 3, or 5 years in the state prison. Existing law, until January 1, 2018, due to an obsolete cross-reference to the repealed provisions described above, made the additional punishment, if it involves a taking or loss of more than $100,000 but less than $500,000, punishable by 2 years in the state prison if the loss was more than $200,000, and one year if the loss was less than that. This bill would remove that obsolete cross-reference and make that additional punishment equal to 2 years in the state prison. Because this bill would increase the penalty for existing felonies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 484?
AB 484 is sponsored by Gabriel, Jesse (Democratic), Berman, Marc (Democratic), and Low.
What is the current status of AB 484?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 484?
Track AB 484 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 484

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 484

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →