California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 55 — Medi-Cal: workforce adjustment for ground ambulance transports.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including emergency or nonemergency medical transportation services, as specified. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law requires, with exceptions, that Medi-Cal reimbursement to providers of emergency medical transports be increased by application of an add-on to the associated Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule. Under existing law, those increased payments are funded solely from a quality assurance fee (QAF) , which emergency medical transport providers are required to pay based on a specified formula, and from federal reimbursement and any other related federal funds. Existing law sets forth separate provisions for increased Medi-Cal reimbursement to providers of ground emergency medical transportation services that are owned or operated by certain types of public entities. This bill would establish, for dates of service on or after July 1, 2024, a workforce adjustment, serving as an additional payment, for each ground ambulance transport performed by a provider of medical transportation services, excluding the above-described public entity providers. The bill would vary the rate of adjustment depending on the point of pickup and whether the service was for an emergency or nonemergency, with the workforce adjustment being equal to 80% of the lowest maximum allowance established by the federal Medicare Program reduced by the fee-for-service payment schedule amount, as specified. The bill would require that the workforce adjustment meet a certain workforce standard, as determined by the department, which would apply to specified classes of employees, including emergency medical dispatchers, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and registered nurses. The bill would set forth criteria for a provider to meet the workforce standard, with formulas taking into account the fiscal year and base hourly wage rates within a class of employees, and whether the provider is a new provider of ground ambulance services. The bill would require the department to direct each Medi-Cal managed care plan to implement a value-based purchasing model that provides for reimbursement to a network provider that meets the workforce standard requirement and that furnishes ambulance transport services, as specified. The bill would require the department to establish the manner and format for participating providers to report the required data, as specified. The bill would require a provider that has received the workforce adjustment to certify under penalty of perjury that it met the workforce standard, as specified. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the department to recoup any workforce adjustments paid to a provider that did not meet the workforce standard. The bill would prohibit implementation of the workforce adjustment from affecting the calculation of the above-described QAF-based add-on, and would prohibit adjustments to the workforce adjustment, except as specified to comply with federal requirements. The bill would condition implementation of the workforce adjustment on receipt of any necessary federal approvals and the availability of federal financial participation. The bill would make conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Read second time and amended.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 25).

  8. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Rodriguez · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Rodriguez

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 55 do?
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including emergency or nonemergency medical transportation services, as specified. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law requires, with exceptions, that Medi-Cal reimbursement to providers of emergency medical transports be increased by application of an add-on to the associated Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment schedule. Under existing law, those increased payments are funded solely from a quality assurance fee (QAF) , which emergency medical transport providers are required to pay based on a specified formula, and from federal reimbursement and any other related federal funds. Existing law sets forth separate provisions for increased Medi-Cal reimbursement to providers of ground emergency medical transportation services that are owned or operated by certain types of public entities. This bill would establish, for dates of service on or after July 1, 2024, a workforce adjustment, serving as an additional payment, for each ground ambulance transport performed by a provider of medical transportation services, excluding the above-described public entity providers. The bill would vary the rate of adjustment depending on the point of pickup and whether the service was for an emergency or nonemergency, with the workforce adjustment being equal to 80% of the lowest maximum allowance established by the federal Medicare Program reduced by the fee-for-service payment schedule amount, as specified. The bill would require that the workforce adjustment meet a certain workforce standard, as determined by the department, which would apply to specified classes of employees, including emergency medical dispatchers, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and registered nurses. The bill would set forth criteria for a provider to meet the workforce standard, with formulas taking into account the fiscal year and base hourly wage rates within a class of employees, and whether the provider is a new provider of ground ambulance services. The bill would require the department to direct each Medi-Cal managed care plan to implement a value-based purchasing model that provides for reimbursement to a network provider that meets the workforce standard requirement and that furnishes ambulance transport services, as specified. The bill would require the department to establish the manner and format for participating providers to report the required data, as specified. The bill would require a provider that has received the workforce adjustment to certify under penalty of perjury that it met the workforce standard, as specified. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the department to recoup any workforce adjustments paid to a provider that did not meet the workforce standard. The bill would prohibit implementation of the workforce adjustment from affecting the calculation of the above-described QAF-based add-on, and would prohibit adjustments to the workforce adjustment, except as specified to comply with federal requirements. The bill would condition implementation of the workforce adjustment on receipt of any necessary federal approvals and the availability of federal financial participation. The bill would make conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 55?
AB 55 is sponsored by Rodriguez.
What is the current status of AB 55?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 55?
Track AB 55 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 55

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 55

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →