California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 1077 — State agencies and counties: antiracism audits.

Last action — Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law prohibits any person from being unlawfully denied full and equal access to the benefits of, or from being unlawfully subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity that is conducted, operated, or administered by the state or by any state agency funded directly by the state, or that receives any financial assistance from the state, on the basis of race. Existing law prohibits the state, including any county, from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. Existing law prohibits the inclusion of any question relative to an applicant's race in any application blank or form required to be filled in and submitted by an applicant to any department, board, commission, officer, agent, or employee of this state. Existing law makes a violation of this provision a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the Controller to superintend the fiscal concerns of the state and to audit all claims against the state. Existing law requires the Controller to suggest plans for the improvement and management of the public revenues. Existing law requires the Controller to summon county auditors to meet with the Controller at least once each year for the purpose of discussion, among other things, promotion of uniformity of procedure in all matters pertaining to the duties of county auditors throughout the state. This bill would require the Controller, on or before January 1, 2025, and every 5 years thereafter, to perform a comprehensive antiracism audit, as defined, of each state agency and county. The bill would require each state agency and county, within one year following completion of its audit, to establish and implement an action plan, as specified, tailored to the function of the agency or particular activities of the county, to rectify deficiencies in the agency's or county's efforts to identify, interrupt, and dismantle racist practices, policies, and attitudes identified by the antiracism audit. Because the bill would require local officials to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the Controller to evaluate and approve the sufficiency of each action plan to rectify deficiencies in the agency's or county's efforts to identify, interrupt, and dismantle racist practices, policies, and attitudes. The bill would authorize the Controller, if they determine that appropriate progress has not been made by a state agency or county toward rectifying deficiencies identified in the antiracism audit within 3 years following completion of the action plan, to impose a civil penalty or to bring an action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction to hold all property of the state agency or county subject to a receivership in a manner directed or ratified by the court. The bill would require the Controller to establish rules and regulations to carry out the purposes of this section. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. Referred to Coms. on A. & A.R. and JUD.

  4. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  5. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1077 do?
Existing law prohibits any person from being unlawfully denied full and equal access to the benefits of, or from being unlawfully subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity that is conducted, operated, or administered by the state or by any state agency funded directly by the state, or that receives any financial assistance from the state, on the basis of race. Existing law prohibits the state, including any county, from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. Existing law prohibits the inclusion of any question relative to an applicant's race in any application blank or form required to be filled in and submitted by an applicant to any department, board, commission, officer, agent, or employee of this state. Existing law makes a violation of this provision a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the Controller to superintend the fiscal concerns of the state and to audit all claims against the state. Existing law requires the Controller to suggest plans for the improvement and management of the public revenues. Existing law requires the Controller to summon county auditors to meet with the Controller at least once each year for the purpose of discussion, among other things, promotion of uniformity of procedure in all matters pertaining to the duties of county auditors throughout the state. This bill would require the Controller, on or before January 1, 2025, and every 5 years thereafter, to perform a comprehensive antiracism audit, as defined, of each state agency and county. The bill would require each state agency and county, within one year following completion of its audit, to establish and implement an action plan, as specified, tailored to the function of the agency or particular activities of the county, to rectify deficiencies in the agency's or county's efforts to identify, interrupt, and dismantle racist practices, policies, and attitudes identified by the antiracism audit. Because the bill would require local officials to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the Controller to evaluate and approve the sufficiency of each action plan to rectify deficiencies in the agency's or county's efforts to identify, interrupt, and dismantle racist practices, policies, and attitudes. The bill would authorize the Controller, if they determine that appropriate progress has not been made by a state agency or county toward rectifying deficiencies identified in the antiracism audit within 3 years following completion of the action plan, to impose a civil penalty or to bring an action in a court of appropriate jurisdiction to hold all property of the state agency or county subject to a receivership in a manner directed or ratified by the court. The bill would require the Controller to establish rules and regulations to carry out the purposes of this section. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 1077?
AB 1077 is sponsored by Jackson, Corey A. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 1077?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1077?
Track AB 1077 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1077

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1077

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →