California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 950 — Accessibility: internet websites.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law imposes liability upon a person who denies, aids or incites a denial, or makes any discrimination or distinction contrary to rights afforded by law, for actual damages suffered, exemplary damages, a civil penalty, and attorney's fees, as specified, to any person who was denied the specified rights. Existing law also imposes liability upon a person, firm, or corporation that denies or interferes with admittance to or enjoyment of public facilities or otherwise interferes with the rights of an individual with a disability, as specified, for damages and attorney's fees to a person who was denied those rights. Existing law establishes in state government the California Commission on Disability Access, which is required to provide information regarding preventing or minimizing problems of compliance by California businesses by providing educational services, including outreach efforts, and by preparing and hosting on its internet website a Guide to Compliance with State Laws and Regulations Regarding Disability Access Requirements. This bill would specify that statutory damages based upon the inaccessibility of an internet website under these provisions shall only be recovered against an entity, as defined, if the internet website fails to provide equally effective communication or facilitate full and equal enjoyment of the entity's goods and services to all members of the public. The bill would require, in order for a plaintiff to be entitled to statutory damages for internet website inaccessibility, the plaintiff to prove either that they personally encountered a barrier that caused them to experience a difference in their access to, or use of, the website as compared to other users, as specified, or that they were deterred from accessing all or part of the internet website or the content of the website because of the website's failure to provide equally effective communication or to facilitate full and equal enjoyment of the entity's goods and services offered to the public. The bill would specify that an internet website is presumed to provide equally effective communication for the purpose of determining whether an award of minimum statutory damages is warranted, as specified, if the internet website, taking into account the variety of conforming implementations that may be used to meet the internet website-related accessibility standard, complies with an internet website-related accessibility standard, as defined. The bill would require the California Commission on Disability Access to review standards described in the definition of internet website-related accessibility standard to determine whether they are the most up-to-date standards for effective communication by means of internet websites, and to notify the Legislature if they are not up to date and should be revised. This bill would make it unlawful for any resource service provider, in exchange for remuneration, to intentionally or knowingly construct, license, distribute, or maintain for online use, an internet website that fails to comply with the internet website-related accessibility standard. The bill would authorize a civil action by a person who is unable to obtain equally effective communication or full and equal enjoyment of an internet website, the content of an internet website, or goods and services offered to the public on an internet website, as a result of the failure of an internet website to meet the internet website-related accessibility standard, with remedies as prescribed. The bill would further authorize a civil action by a person or entity that pays, compensates, or contracts with a resource service provider to construct, license, distribute, or maintain an internet website for the purpose of providing equally effective communication or facilitating full and equal enjoyment of the person or entity's goods and services to all members of the public, including any member of the public who is disabled, with remedies as prescribed. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General or a district attorney, county counsel, or city attorney to bring an action to obtain injunctive or declaratory relief and attorney's fees and costs. The bill would provide that a provision within a contract between a person or entity and a resource service provider that seeks to waive liability under these provisions is subject to specified provisions of the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 relating to waiver of rights. (2) Existing law requires each city, county, or city and county that issues business licenses, building permits for additions, alterations, and structural repairs to commercial property, or building permits for new construction of commercial property to make available, and, upon receipt of an application for a business license or building permit to provide to the applicant, an informational notice to the applicant containing, among other things, general information about the compliance requirements pursuant to the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the state's disability access laws and advisories to both building permit applicants and business license applicants encouraging consultations and inspections by certified access specialists. This bill would also require the information about the compliance requirements pursuant to the state's disability access laws to include a statement that a business' internet website is required to be accessible, and to provide equally effective communication or facilitate full and equal enjoyment of the entity's goods and services, to the public, including any member of the public who is disabled. The bill would require the advisories to encourage applicants to include in specified contracts warranty and indemnification clauses relating to accessibility standards and to consider not working with individuals or organizations unwilling to warranty their work and to indemnify the applicant for judgements rendered against them for violating website-related accessibility standards. By imposing new requirements on local government agencies, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would also make other conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Read second time and amended.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 25).

  8. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  10. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  12. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Maienschein · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Maienschein

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

civil-rights technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 950 do?
(1) Existing law imposes liability upon a person who denies, aids or incites a denial, or makes any discrimination or distinction contrary to rights afforded by law, for actual damages suffered, exemplary damages, a civil penalty, and attorney's fees, as specified, to any person who was denied the specified rights. Existing law also imposes liability upon a person, firm, or corporation that denies or interferes with admittance to or enjoyment of public facilities or otherwise interferes with the rights of an individual with a disability, as specified, for damages and attorney's fees to a person who was denied those rights. Existing law establishes in state government the California Commission on Disability Access, which is required to provide information regarding preventing or minimizing problems of compliance by California businesses by providing educational services, including outreach efforts, and by preparing and hosting on its internet website a Guide to Compliance with State Laws and Regulations Regarding Disability Access Requirements. This bill would specify that statutory damages based upon the inaccessibility of an internet website under these provisions shall only be recovered against an entity, as defined, if the internet website fails to provide equally effective communication or facilitate full and equal enjoyment of the entity's goods and services to all members of the public. The bill would require, in order for a plaintiff to be entitled to statutory damages for internet website inaccessibility, the plaintiff to prove either that they personally encountered a barrier that caused them to experience a difference in their access to, or use of, the website as compared to other users, as specified, or that they were deterred from accessing all or part of the internet website or the content of the website because of the website's failure to provide equally effective communication or to facilitate full and equal enjoyment of the entity's goods and services offered to the public. The bill would specify that an internet website is presumed to provide equally effective communication for the purpose of determining whether an award of minimum statutory damages is warranted, as specified, if the internet website, taking into account the variety of conforming implementations that may be used to meet the internet website-related accessibility standard, complies with an internet website-related accessibility standard, as defined. The bill would require the California Commission on Disability Access to review standards described in the definition of internet website-related accessibility standard to determine whether they are the most up-to-date standards for effective communication by means of internet websites, and to notify the Legislature if they are not up to date and should be revised. This bill would make it unlawful for any resource service provider, in exchange for remuneration, to intentionally or knowingly construct, license, distribute, or maintain for online use, an internet website that fails to comply with the internet website-related accessibility standard. The bill would authorize a civil action by a person who is unable to obtain equally effective communication or full and equal enjoyment of an internet website, the content of an internet website, or goods and services offered to the public on an internet website, as a result of the failure of an internet website to meet the internet website-related accessibility standard, with remedies as prescribed. The bill would further authorize a civil action by a person or entity that pays, compensates, or contracts with a resource service provider to construct, license, distribute, or maintain an internet website for the purpose of providing equally effective communication or facilitating full and equal enjoyment of the person or entity's goods and services to all members of the public, including any member of the public who is disabled, with remedies as prescribed. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General or a district attorney, county counsel, or city attorney to bring an action to obtain injunctive or declaratory relief and attorney's fees and costs. The bill would provide that a provision within a contract between a person or entity and a resource service provider that seeks to waive liability under these provisions is subject to specified provisions of the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 relating to waiver of rights. (2) Existing law requires each city, county, or city and county that issues business licenses, building permits for additions, alterations, and structural repairs to commercial property, or building permits for new construction of commercial property to make available, and, upon receipt of an application for a business license or building permit to provide to the applicant, an informational notice to the applicant containing, among other things, general information about the compliance requirements pursuant to the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the state's disability access laws and advisories to both building permit applicants and business license applicants encouraging consultations and inspections by certified access specialists. This bill would also require the information about the compliance requirements pursuant to the state's disability access laws to include a statement that a business' internet website is required to be accessible, and to provide equally effective communication or facilitate full and equal enjoyment of the entity's goods and services, to the public, including any member of the public who is disabled. The bill would require the advisories to encourage applicants to include in specified contracts warranty and indemnification clauses relating to accessibility standards and to consider not working with individuals or organizations unwilling to warranty their work and to indemnify the applicant for judgements rendered against them for violating website-related accessibility standards. By imposing new requirements on local government agencies, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would also make other conforming changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 950?
AB 950 is sponsored by Maienschein.
What is the current status of AB 950?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 950?
Track AB 950 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 950

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 950

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →