California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 3192 — Major coastal resorts: audits: waste.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976, among other things, requires anyone wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, except as specified, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission or a local government, as provided. This bill would establish the Major Coastal Resorts Environmental Accountability Act, and would define "major coastal resort" for these purposes. The bill would require a major coastal resort, with the assistance of a qualified, independent consultant, to every 2 years prepare an audit of the major coastal resort's compliance with specified provisions, including the coastal development permit, as provided. The bill would require the commission to compile and keep updated a list of consultants qualified to assist with the audit. The bill would require the major coastal resort to provide for the qualified consultant's compensation for the audit, as provided. The bill would prohibit the major coastal resort from discriminating or retaliating against any employee or applicant for employment for, among other things, participating in the audit or an investigation, as provided. The bill would require the major coastal resort to post the audit on its internet website and to provide copies to the commission and relevant local governments. The bill would authorize the commission to charge a major coastal resort a fee for compiling and updating the list of qualified, independent consultants and receiving copies of the audits, as provided. The bill would subject a major coastal resort that violates these requirements to specified administrative penalties assessed by the commission. The bill would permit the use of any nonorganic pesticide, as defined, or fertilizing material, as defined, on areas of a golf course at a major coastal resort only as provided. The bill would subject a major coastal resort that violates this requirement to specified administrative penalties assessed by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. (2) Existing law prohibits lodging establishments from providing a small plastic bottle containing a personal care product to a person staying in a sleeping room accommodation, in any space within the sleeping room accommodation, or within bathrooms shared by the public or guests. This bill would prohibit a major coastal resort from providing to guests specified materials, including single-use plastic bottled beverages. The bill would require a major coastal resort to, among other things, provide at least one recycling bin or container in each guest room, as provided. The bill would require the major coastal resort to maintain records related to these requirements for 3 years. The bill would subject a major coastal resort that violates these requirements to specified administrative penalties assessed by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Read second time and amended.

  5. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 23).

  6. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  7. (Pending re-refer to Com. on JUD.)

  8. Assembly Rule 56 suspended.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.

  13. In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  14. Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.

  15. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  16. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7001
Unaffiliated 1100
Republican 0200
Total 8301
% of votes cast 67%25%0%8%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Maienschein — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5001
Unaffiliated 1001
Republican 0300
Total 6302
% of votes cast 55%27%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Reconsideration.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2000
Republican 3000
Democratic 6000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Hoover, Josh Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

Failed 5 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 1001
Democratic 4002
Republican 0300
Total 5303
% of votes cast 45%27%0%27%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Not Voting
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 3192 do?
(1) Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976, among other things, requires anyone wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, except as specified, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission or a local government, as provided. This bill would establish the Major Coastal Resorts Environmental Accountability Act, and would define "major coastal resort" for these purposes. The bill would require a major coastal resort, with the assistance of a qualified, independent consultant, to every 2 years prepare an audit of the major coastal resort's compliance with specified provisions, including the coastal development permit, as provided. The bill would require the commission to compile and keep updated a list of consultants qualified to assist with the audit. The bill would require the major coastal resort to provide for the qualified consultant's compensation for the audit, as provided. The bill would prohibit the major coastal resort from discriminating or retaliating against any employee or applicant for employment for, among other things, participating in the audit or an investigation, as provided. The bill would require the major coastal resort to post the audit on its internet website and to provide copies to the commission and relevant local governments. The bill would authorize the commission to charge a major coastal resort a fee for compiling and updating the list of qualified, independent consultants and receiving copies of the audits, as provided. The bill would subject a major coastal resort that violates these requirements to specified administrative penalties assessed by the commission. The bill would permit the use of any nonorganic pesticide, as defined, or fertilizing material, as defined, on areas of a golf course at a major coastal resort only as provided. The bill would subject a major coastal resort that violates this requirement to specified administrative penalties assessed by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. (2) Existing law prohibits lodging establishments from providing a small plastic bottle containing a personal care product to a person staying in a sleeping room accommodation, in any space within the sleeping room accommodation, or within bathrooms shared by the public or guests. This bill would prohibit a major coastal resort from providing to guests specified materials, including single-use plastic bottled beverages. The bill would require a major coastal resort to, among other things, provide at least one recycling bin or container in each guest room, as provided. The bill would require the major coastal resort to maintain records related to these requirements for 3 years. The bill would subject a major coastal resort that violates these requirements to specified administrative penalties assessed by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
Who sponsors AB 3192?
AB 3192 is sponsored by Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 3192?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 3192?
Track AB 3192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 3192

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 3192

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →