California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 162 — Developmental services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 47, Statutes of 2024.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Gavin Newsom (Democratic) on July 02, 2024.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes within the California Health and Human Services Agency a State Department of Developmental Services (department) and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, the administration and oversight of community programs providing services to consumers with developmental disabilities and their families. Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (act) , requires the department to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. This bill would require the Secretary of California Health and Human Services Agency (secretary) , in coordination with the department, to lead the development and implementation of a master plan for developmental services for the state. The bill would require other state entities that interact with the department to be included in discussions with the master plan, as applicable. The bill also would require the secretary and the Director of Developmental Services to work with other state agencies, as necessary, to identify policies, efficiencies, and strategies necessary to implement the master plan, as specified. The bill would also require the secretary to submit to the Governor and the Legislature an initial report summarizing the recommended components of the master plan, as well as annual master plan implementation updates, as specified. The bill would clarify that any funding needed to support program enhancements proposed in the master plan would be subject to an appropriation by the Legislature for those purposes. (2) Existing law requires the department to submit, on or before March 1, 2019, a rate study to specified committees of the Legislature regarding community-based services for individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires the department to implement rate increases between April 1, 2022, and July 1, 2024, to raise service providers' rates to the fully funded rate reflected in the rate models included in that rate study. Existing law requires the department, commencing January 1, 2023, through the end of the 2023–24 fiscal year, to adjust rates to equal 12 of the difference between rates in effect March 31, 2022, and the fully funded rate model for each provider. Existing law requires the department, commencing July 1, 2024, to implement the fully funded rate models, as specified. This bill would extend the above rate adjustment period from the end of the 2023–24 fiscal year through December 31, 2024, and would extend the date for implementation of the fully funded rate models to January 1, 2025. Existing law requires the department to implement a hold harmless policy, as specified, for providers whose rates exceed rate model recommendations, to freeze a provider's existing rates until June 30, 2026, and then to adjust the provider's rates to equal the rates for other providers in the provider's service category and region. Existing law requires the department, beginning July 1, 2024, to implement a similar hold harmless policy for providers whose rates in effect on January 1, 2023, exceed 90% of the rate model. This bill instead would begin implementation of the latter hold harmless policy on January 1, 2025. (3) The act requires the department to contract with regional centers for the provision of community services and supports for persons with developmental disabilities and their families. Existing law, until June 30, 2024, requires a meeting regarding the provision of services and supports by the regional center, including a meeting to develop or revise a consumer's individual program plan (IPP) , to be held by remote electronic communications if requested by the consumer or, if appropriate, if requested by the consumer's parents, legal guardian, conservator, or authorized representative. Under existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, direct services for eligible infants and toddlers and their families are provided by regional centers and local educational agencies. Existing law requires an eligible infant or toddler receiving services to have an individualized family service plan (IFSP) and requires that parents be fully informed of their rights, including the right to invite another person, including a family member or an advocate or peer parent, to accompany them to any or all IFSP meetings. Existing law, until June 30, 2024, requires, at the request of the parent or legal guardian, an IFSP meeting to be held by remote electronic communications. This bill would indefinitely extend the requirements that, if requested, IPP and IFSP meetings be held by remote electronic communications. By extending a requirement for local educational agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would require a regional center that has not held an in-person meeting, or completed any other in-person meeting or visit in the previous 12 months for an IPP or 6 months for an IFSP, to hold an in-person meeting or other meeting, as prescribed. The bill would prohibit that in-person meeting requirement from impeding, delaying, or preventing the timely development or revision of an IFSP or IPP, or the timely authorization or receipt of services and supports. The bill would also require the in-person meeting requirement to remain in effect pending a review by the department, to be completed and provided to the Legislature by May 14, 2026, and in coordination with stakeholders, regarding implementation of these provisions, including whether and to what extent the in-person requirements are effective in assisting the infant or toddler in meeting the goals stated in the IFSP, among other specified information. The bill would also require the department to provide an update to the Legislature on the status of the review by no later than January 10, 2026. (4) Existing law requires the department to conduct fiscal audits of regional centers. This bill would authorize the department and regional centers to utilize probability sampling and statistical extrapolation when conducting fiscal audits of service providers under specified conditions. Existing law requires the department to establish, and regional centers to administer, an entry-level training and internship program for individuals interested in becoming direct support professionals, as specified. This bill would specify that the establishment and administration of that program is subject to an appropriation by the Legislature. (5) Existing law establishes the Family Cost Participation Program, which requires the department to develop and establish a Family Cost Participation Schedule consisting of a sliding scale for families with an annual gross income of not less than 400% of the federal poverty guideline, as specified, to be used by regional centers to assess the parents' cost participation for providing respite, daycare, and camping services to their children under 18 years of age who have developmental disabilities and who, among other eligibility criteria, are not eligible for Medi-Cal. Existing law also requires a regional center to assess an annual family program fee, as specified, from parents whose adjusted gross family income is at or above 400% of the federal poverty level and who have a child meeting prescribed requirements, including receiving specified services from a regional center. Existing law requires regional centers to suspend, until June 30, 2024, existing and new assessments and reassessments of the cost participation and existing and new assessments, reassessments, and collections of the annual family program fee. This bill would repeal those provisions relating to regional center fees and would make technical and conforming changes. (6) Existing law defines "developmental disability" as a disability that originates before an individual attains 18 years of age, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for the individual. Under existing law, "developmental disability" includes intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism, among other conditions, as specified. Under existing law, if a child who is under 5 years of age is not otherwise eligible for regional center services under that definition, the child is provisionally eligible for regional center services if the child has a disability that is not solely physical in nature and has significant functional limitations, as specified. Under this bill, a child who is under 5 years of age would be provisionally eligible for regional center services if the child has a disability that is not solely physical in nature and has significant functional limitations, as specified, without regard to whether the child is not otherwise eligible for regional center services under the definition of "developmental disability." Existing law requires the regional center, after an infant or toddler has been determined eligible for early intervention services, to determine if the child is also provisionally eligible for regional center services. This bill would instead authorize a regional center to concurrently assess an infant or toddler who has been determined eligible for early intervention services to determine whether the infant or toddler is provisionally eligible for regional center services. Existing law requires a regional center to assess an infant or toddler who has been determined eligible for early intervention services, at least 90 days before they turn 3 years of age, for purposes of determining their ongoing eligibility for regional center services. If the regional center determines that the child does not have a developmental disability, existing law requires the regional center to determine if the child is provisionally eligible for regional center services. This bill would instead require a regional center to assess a child who qualifies for early intervention services but has not been found to have a developmental disability or to be provisionally eligible, at least 90 days before they turn 3 years of age, for purposes of determining their eligibility for regional center services. (7) The act authorizes the department to implement the provision of social recreation services, camping services, and nonmedical therapies by means of written directives or similar instructions, including the provision of those services as participant-directed services. This bill would require regional centers to use certain principles when purchasing those services, including that consumers receive services and supports in settings that are typical of those in which persons without disabilities engage in social recreation, camping, or nonmedical therapies. The bill would prohibit regional center purchase-of-service policies and related procedures from imposing certain restrictions or conditions on those services. The bill would require, by October 1, 2024, regional centers to designate one or more employees to serve as a point of contact regarding access to those services and any related policies, procedures, or written directives, as specified. The bill would require, by January 1, 2025, regional centers to adopt procedures aimed at increasing the availability of vendors and expediting vendorizations accordingly. The bill would require, by March 1, 2025, regional center staff to complete training about those services, as specified. The bill would require the department, as part of its quarterly briefings to the Legislature, to provide certain information on the status of implementation of these provisions. The bill would make changes to related legislative findings. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (9) The Budget Act of 2021 made appropriations for the support of state government for the 2021−22 fiscal year. This bill would reappropriate specified amounts from the Budget Act of 2021 to extend the period to liquidate encumbrances of those funds to June 30, 2025. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 47, Statutes of 2024.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 1.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 7. Page 4769.).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 26).

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 14. Page 859.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Withdrawn from committee.

  20. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 61. Noes 17. Page 732.)

  21. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 18 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 73 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 45002
Unaffiliated 16102
Republican 12001
Total 73105
% of votes cast 92%1%0%6%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Essayli — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Ting — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Dixon, Diane Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Hoover, Josh Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea
Sanchez, Kate Republican Not Voting
Ta, Tri Republican Yea
Wallis, Greg Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10000
Unaffiliated 3101
Republican 0400
Total 13501
% of votes cast 68%26%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Skinner — Yea
Newman — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Eggman — Not Voting
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 31 Yea · 7 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9101
Democratic 21001
Republican 1600
Total 31702
% of votes cast 78%18%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Newman — Yea
Min — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Portantino — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 14 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 45001
Unaffiliated 15303
Republican 01102
Total 601406
% of votes cast 75%18%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Boerner Horvath — Yea
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Yea
Low — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Essayli — Nay
Maienschein — Not Voting
Waldron — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Not Voting
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 162 do?
(1) Existing law establishes within the California Health and Human Services Agency a State Department of Developmental Services (department) and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, the administration and oversight of community programs providing services to consumers with developmental disabilities and their families. Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (act) , requires the department to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. This bill would require the Secretary of California Health and Human Services Agency (secretary) , in coordination with the department, to lead the development and implementation of a master plan for developmental services for the state. The bill would require other state entities that interact with the department to be included in discussions with the master plan, as applicable. The bill also would require the secretary and the Director of Developmental Services to work with other state agencies, as necessary, to identify policies, efficiencies, and strategies necessary to implement the master plan, as specified. The bill would also require the secretary to submit to the Governor and the Legislature an initial report summarizing the recommended components of the master plan, as well as annual master plan implementation updates, as specified. The bill would clarify that any funding needed to support program enhancements proposed in the master plan would be subject to an appropriation by the Legislature for those purposes. (2) Existing law requires the department to submit, on or before March 1, 2019, a rate study to specified committees of the Legislature regarding community-based services for individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires the department to implement rate increases between April 1, 2022, and July 1, 2024, to raise service providers' rates to the fully funded rate reflected in the rate models included in that rate study. Existing law requires the department, commencing January 1, 2023, through the end of the 2023–24 fiscal year, to adjust rates to equal 12 of the difference between rates in effect March 31, 2022, and the fully funded rate model for each provider. Existing law requires the department, commencing July 1, 2024, to implement the fully funded rate models, as specified. This bill would extend the above rate adjustment period from the end of the 2023–24 fiscal year through December 31, 2024, and would extend the date for implementation of the fully funded rate models to January 1, 2025. Existing law requires the department to implement a hold harmless policy, as specified, for providers whose rates exceed rate model recommendations, to freeze a provider's existing rates until June 30, 2026, and then to adjust the provider's rates to equal the rates for other providers in the provider's service category and region. Existing law requires the department, beginning July 1, 2024, to implement a similar hold harmless policy for providers whose rates in effect on January 1, 2023, exceed 90% of the rate model. This bill instead would begin implementation of the latter hold harmless policy on January 1, 2025. (3) The act requires the department to contract with regional centers for the provision of community services and supports for persons with developmental disabilities and their families. Existing law, until June 30, 2024, requires a meeting regarding the provision of services and supports by the regional center, including a meeting to develop or revise a consumer's individual program plan (IPP) , to be held by remote electronic communications if requested by the consumer or, if appropriate, if requested by the consumer's parents, legal guardian, conservator, or authorized representative. Under existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, direct services for eligible infants and toddlers and their families are provided by regional centers and local educational agencies. Existing law requires an eligible infant or toddler receiving services to have an individualized family service plan (IFSP) and requires that parents be fully informed of their rights, including the right to invite another person, including a family member or an advocate or peer parent, to accompany them to any or all IFSP meetings. Existing law, until June 30, 2024, requires, at the request of the parent or legal guardian, an IFSP meeting to be held by remote electronic communications. This bill would indefinitely extend the requirements that, if requested, IPP and IFSP meetings be held by remote electronic communications. By extending a requirement for local educational agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would require a regional center that has not held an in-person meeting, or completed any other in-person meeting or visit in the previous 12 months for an IPP or 6 months for an IFSP, to hold an in-person meeting or other meeting, as prescribed. The bill would prohibit that in-person meeting requirement from impeding, delaying, or preventing the timely development or revision of an IFSP or IPP, or the timely authorization or receipt of services and supports. The bill would also require the in-person meeting requirement to remain in effect pending a review by the department, to be completed and provided to the Legislature by May 14, 2026, and in coordination with stakeholders, regarding implementation of these provisions, including whether and to what extent the in-person requirements are effective in assisting the infant or toddler in meeting the goals stated in the IFSP, among other specified information. The bill would also require the department to provide an update to the Legislature on the status of the review by no later than January 10, 2026. (4) Existing law requires the department to conduct fiscal audits of regional centers. This bill would authorize the department and regional centers to utilize probability sampling and statistical extrapolation when conducting fiscal audits of service providers under specified conditions. Existing law requires the department to establish, and regional centers to administer, an entry-level training and internship program for individuals interested in becoming direct support professionals, as specified. This bill would specify that the establishment and administration of that program is subject to an appropriation by the Legislature. (5) Existing law establishes the Family Cost Participation Program, which requires the department to develop and establish a Family Cost Participation Schedule consisting of a sliding scale for families with an annual gross income of not less than 400% of the federal poverty guideline, as specified, to be used by regional centers to assess the parents' cost participation for providing respite, daycare, and camping services to their children under 18 years of age who have developmental disabilities and who, among other eligibility criteria, are not eligible for Medi-Cal. Existing law also requires a regional center to assess an annual family program fee, as specified, from parents whose adjusted gross family income is at or above 400% of the federal poverty level and who have a child meeting prescribed requirements, including receiving specified services from a regional center. Existing law requires regional centers to suspend, until June 30, 2024, existing and new assessments and reassessments of the cost participation and existing and new assessments, reassessments, and collections of the annual family program fee. This bill would repeal those provisions relating to regional center fees and would make technical and conforming changes. (6) Existing law defines "developmental disability" as a disability that originates before an individual attains 18 years of age, continues, or can be expected to continue, indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for the individual. Under existing law, "developmental disability" includes intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism, among other conditions, as specified. Under existing law, if a child who is under 5 years of age is not otherwise eligible for regional center services under that definition, the child is provisionally eligible for regional center services if the child has a disability that is not solely physical in nature and has significant functional limitations, as specified. Under this bill, a child who is under 5 years of age would be provisionally eligible for regional center services if the child has a disability that is not solely physical in nature and has significant functional limitations, as specified, without regard to whether the child is not otherwise eligible for regional center services under the definition of "developmental disability." Existing law requires the regional center, after an infant or toddler has been determined eligible for early intervention services, to determine if the child is also provisionally eligible for regional center services. This bill would instead authorize a regional center to concurrently assess an infant or toddler who has been determined eligible for early intervention services to determine whether the infant or toddler is provisionally eligible for regional center services. Existing law requires a regional center to assess an infant or toddler who has been determined eligible for early intervention services, at least 90 days before they turn 3 years of age, for purposes of determining their ongoing eligibility for regional center services. If the regional center determines that the child does not have a developmental disability, existing law requires the regional center to determine if the child is provisionally eligible for regional center services. This bill would instead require a regional center to assess a child who qualifies for early intervention services but has not been found to have a developmental disability or to be provisionally eligible, at least 90 days before they turn 3 years of age, for purposes of determining their eligibility for regional center services. (7) The act authorizes the department to implement the provision of social recreation services, camping services, and nonmedical therapies by means of written directives or similar instructions, including the provision of those services as participant-directed services. This bill would require regional centers to use certain principles when purchasing those services, including that consumers receive services and supports in settings that are typical of those in which persons without disabilities engage in social recreation, camping, or nonmedical therapies. The bill would prohibit regional center purchase-of-service policies and related procedures from imposing certain restrictions or conditions on those services. The bill would require, by October 1, 2024, regional centers to designate one or more employees to serve as a point of contact regarding access to those services and any related policies, procedures, or written directives, as specified. The bill would require, by January 1, 2025, regional centers to adopt procedures aimed at increasing the availability of vendors and expediting vendorizations accordingly. The bill would require, by March 1, 2025, regional center staff to complete training about those services, as specified. The bill would require the department, as part of its quarterly briefings to the Legislature, to provide certain information on the status of implementation of these provisions. The bill would make changes to related legislative findings. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (9) The Budget Act of 2021 made appropriations for the support of state government for the 2021−22 fiscal year. This bill would reappropriate specified amounts from the Budget Act of 2021 to extend the period to liquidate encumbrances of those funds to June 30, 2025. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 162?
AB 162 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 162?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 162?
Track AB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 162

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 162

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →