SB 31 — Encampments: sensitive areas: penalties.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, a person who lodges in a public or private place without permission is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor. Existing law also provides that a person who willfully and maliciously obstructs the free movement of any person on any street, sidewalk, or other public place is guilty of a misdemeanor. Under existing law, a public nuisance is anything that is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property by an entire community, neighborhood, or considerable number of persons. Existing law provides various remedies against a public nuisance, including abatement by any public body or officer authorized by law. This bill would prohibit a person from sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property upon any street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way within 1000 feet of a sensitive area, as defined. The bill would specify that a violation of this prohibition is a public nuisance that can be abated and prevented, as provided. The bill would also provide that a violation of the prohibition may be charged as a misdemeanor or an infraction, at the discretion of the prosecutor. The bill would prohibit a person from being found in violation of the bill's provisions unless provided notice, at least 72 hours before commencement of any enforcement action, as provided. By imposing criminal penalties for a violation of these provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/22/23 - Amended Senate Current pdf March 22, 2023
- Introduced 12/05/22 - Introduced pdf December 05, 2022
- SB31 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
January 9 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing January 9.
-
March 28 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 1. Noes 1. Page 577.) Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB S.
-
Set for hearing March 28.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Brian W. Jones · Primary
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Roger W. Niello · Cosponsor
- Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh · Cosponsor
- Kelly Seyarto · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
Co-sponsors (8)
- Grove, Shannon Republican
- Dodd
- Nguyen
- Niello, Roger W. Republican
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican
- Seyarto, Kelly Republican
- Wilk
- Dahle, Megan Republican
Not signed on (113)
113 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 113 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wahab, Aisha | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 20% | 20% | 0% | 60% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Wahab, Aisha | Democratic | Nay |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 31 do?
- Under existing law, a person who lodges in a public or private place without permission is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor. Existing law also provides that a person who willfully and maliciously obstructs the free movement of any person on any street, sidewalk, or other public place is guilty of a misdemeanor. Under existing law, a public nuisance is anything that is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property by an entire community, neighborhood, or considerable number of persons. Existing law provides various remedies against a public nuisance, including abatement by any public body or officer authorized by law. This bill would prohibit a person from sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property upon any street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way within 1000 feet of a sensitive area, as defined. The bill would specify that a violation of this prohibition is a public nuisance that can be abated and prevented, as provided. The bill would also provide that a violation of the prohibition may be charged as a misdemeanor or an infraction, at the discretion of the prosecutor. The bill would prohibit a person from being found in violation of the bill's provisions unless provided notice, at least 72 hours before commencement of any enforcement action, as provided. By imposing criminal penalties for a violation of these provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 31?
- SB 31 is sponsored by Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Grove, Shannon (Republican), Dodd, Nguyen, Niello, Roger W. (Republican), Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (Republican), Seyarto, Kelly (Republican), Wilk, and Dahle, Megan (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 31?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 31?
- Track SB 31 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 31
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 31
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →