Civil service: veterans' preference.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 943 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 943.
You're tracking SB 943
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 943 — Civil service: veterans' preference.
Last action — May 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the State Civil Service Act, requires the Department of Human Resources to administer the Personnel Classification Plan of the State of California, including allocating every position to the appropriate class. Existing law requires the allocation of a position to a class be derived from, and determined by, ascertaining the duties and responsibilities of the position, and be based on the principle that all positions are to be included in the same class if certain qualifications apply, including, but not limited to, that the positions are sufficiently similar in respect to duties and responsibilities that the same descriptive title may be used, and substantially the same requirements as to education, experience, knowledge, and ability are demanded of incumbents. Existing law also prescribes a comprehensive civil service personnel system for the state and specifically provides certain preferences for veterans. Existing law grants to a person retired from the United States military, honorably discharged from active military duty with a service-connected disability, or honorably discharged from active duty eligibility for civil service examinations for which they meet the minimum qualifications for the classification. Existing law requires that, in evaluating minimum qualifications, related military experience be considered state civil service experience in a comparable class, based on the duties and responsibilities assigned. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2026, to review the department Personnel Classification Plan of the State of California and identify which classes are compatible with creating a waiver for a bachelor's degree requirement for a veteran, as defined, who has served at the level of E-6 or higher for more than 2 years. For a class identified by the department, where a bachelor's degree is required as a minimum qualification for a civil service examination, the bill would require the department to, commencing July 1, 2026, waive the bachelor's degree requirement for a veteran who has served at the level of E-6 or higher for more than 2 years.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/14/24 - Amended Senate Current pdf March 14, 2024
- Introduced 01/18/24 - Introduced pdf January 18, 2024
- SB943 View text html
Action History
-
May 16 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
May 6 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 6.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3703.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on M. & V.A. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3562.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on M. & V.A.
-
Set for hearing April 10.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
-
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and M. & V.A.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 18.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Jim Patterson · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Marie Alvarado-Gil · Cosponsor
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
- Newman · Cosponsor
- Kelly Seyarto · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Phillip Chen · Cosponsor
- Laurie Davies · Cosponsor
- Diane Dixon · Cosponsor
- Essayli · Cosponsor
- Heath Flora · Cosponsor
- Garcia · Cosponsor
- Josh Hoover · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
- Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh · Primary
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican
Co-sponsors (17)
- Jim Patterson
- Mathis
- Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
- Newman
- Seyarto, Kelly Republican
- Wilk
- Chen, Phillip Republican
- Davies, Laurie Republican
- Dixon, Diane Republican
- Essayli
- Flora, Heath Republican
- Garcia
- Hoover, Josh Republican
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Patterson, Joe Republican
- Grove, Shannon Republican
Not signed on (104)
104 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 104 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wahab, Aisha | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Menjivar, Caroline | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarado-Gil, Marie | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 943 do?
- Existing law, the State Civil Service Act, requires the Department of Human Resources to administer the Personnel Classification Plan of the State of California, including allocating every position to the appropriate class. Existing law requires the allocation of a position to a class be derived from, and determined by, ascertaining the duties and responsibilities of the position, and be based on the principle that all positions are to be included in the same class if certain qualifications apply, including, but not limited to, that the positions are sufficiently similar in respect to duties and responsibilities that the same descriptive title may be used, and substantially the same requirements as to education, experience, knowledge, and ability are demanded of incumbents. Existing law also prescribes a comprehensive civil service personnel system for the state and specifically provides certain preferences for veterans. Existing law grants to a person retired from the United States military, honorably discharged from active military duty with a service-connected disability, or honorably discharged from active duty eligibility for civil service examinations for which they meet the minimum qualifications for the classification. Existing law requires that, in evaluating minimum qualifications, related military experience be considered state civil service experience in a comparable class, based on the duties and responsibilities assigned. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2026, to review the department Personnel Classification Plan of the State of California and identify which classes are compatible with creating a waiver for a bachelor's degree requirement for a veteran, as defined, who has served at the level of E-6 or higher for more than 2 years. For a class identified by the department, where a bachelor's degree is required as a minimum qualification for a civil service examination, the bill would require the department to, commencing July 1, 2026, waive the bachelor's degree requirement for a veteran who has served at the level of E-6 or higher for more than 2 years.
- Who sponsors SB 943?
- SB 943 is sponsored by Jim Patterson, Mathis, Alvarado-Gil, Marie (Republican), Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Newman, Seyarto, Kelly (Republican), Wilk, Chen, Phillip (Republican), Davies, Laurie (Republican), Dixon, Diane (Republican), Essayli, Flora, Heath (Republican), Garcia, Hoover, Josh (Republican), Lackey, Tom (Republican), Patterson, Joe (Republican), Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (Republican), and Grove, Shannon (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 943?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 943?
- Track SB 943 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 943
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 943
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →